A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Thoughts on SGS 1-34 wave ship?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old March 8th 21, 09:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Thoughts on SGS 1-34 wave ship?

Hello fellow glider pilots,
I have a question for the community, curious to hear people's thoughts. During my wave flight at KIYK in December, I experienced freezing of the controls (1996 DG303.) I suspect this is likely due to the low temperatures (-70F at 36K ft). I contacted DG and they had no information to share. Two possible causes could be thermal contraction issues or frozen grease. After looking over the ship with my A&P, it does not look feasible to regrease the mechanical circuit since almost all of the circuit is inaccessible (without cutting into the glass.) If it was thermal contraction, not sure what we could do to address this; this would also entail cutting into the glass.

So I am thinking about putting together a glider which could be used for this kind of flying and have been thinking about a SGS 1-34. A number of the older pilots out of KIYK have flown the Sierra wave in this model; the Boulder club used this model for its high altitude flying.

I am curious what you folks think of this plan? Is there a better ship to consider? Metrics I think are important to consider: known behavior at high altitudes, room for oxygen equipment, ease of access of mechanical control circuits, robustness (forces in rotor can be large), cost of glider, cost to maintain.

Given what I have read, the 1-34 seems to satisfy these criteria with the added benefit that it could be left assembled at the airfield. Terminal velocity dive brakes are an advantage for the 1-34.

Is there anything I am missing? Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
Keith
N303DG
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F-16 Sonic wave vs Pressure wave 6202.JPG 126 Lurker[_4_] Aviation Photos 0 August 12th 19 04:14 AM
F-16 Sonic wave vs Pressure wave 6203.JPG 404 (1/1) J3[_2_] Aviation Photos 0 August 11th 19 06:31 PM
T6 Formation flight with Ship to Ship and ATC COMS - Video [email protected] Piloting 5 September 10th 09 06:09 PM
OT T6 Formation flight with Ship to Ship and ATC COMS - Video A Lieberma[_2_] Owning 0 September 10th 09 12:47 AM
OT - T6 Formation flight with Ship to Ship and ATC COMS - Video [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 0 September 10th 09 12:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.