A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Missile defense



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 28th 04, 02:13 AM
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Missile defense

from http://www.washtimes.com/national/inring.htm
Missile defense
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld took a jab at critics of U.S.
missile defense efforts during a speech last week in Huntsville, Ala.
When he joined a commission on ballistic missile threats in 1998, "I
was stunned by how theological the missile defense debate had become.
It was really a hair knot," Mr. Rumsfeld said. "Everyone felt
something very, very strongly about it. Even the proponents disagreed
very strongly. And the opponents disagreed very strongly. And things
were pretty much on dead center as a result of it. It was a shame."
Mr. Rumsfeld said President Bush ended the impasse by junking the 1972
Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. He noted that two years after Mr. Bush
announced the decision to finally deploy a missile defense system, "in
the past few weeks, the first interceptor has been put in place in
Fort Greeley, Alaska," and that "by the end of this year we expect to
have a limited operational capability against incoming ballistic
missiles." Mr. Rumsfeld said the initial deployment represents "the
triumph of hope and vision over pessimism and skepticism." The
deployment probably is "somewhat of a disappointment for those who
were convinced it would fail," he said. He noted his cordial
discussions days earlier with Russian officials on missile defense and
said that critics, primarily liberal weapons-control advocates, who
think U.S. missile defenses would be destabilizing were wrong. "The
sky-is-falling group was wrong. The sky did not fall. It's still up
there." Mr. Rumsfeld also was asked about the danger of terrorists or
rogue states attacking the United States by putting a short-range
Scud-type missile on a freighter and firing it close to U.S. shores.
He said one Middle East nation already has "launched a ballistic
missile from a cargo vessel." "They had taken a short-range, probably
Scud missile, put it on a transporter-erector launcher, lowered it in,
taken the vessel out into the water, peeled back the top, erected it,
fired it, lowered it, covered it up. And the ship that they used was
using a radar and electronic equipment that was no different than 50,
60, 100 other ships operating in the immediate area." Other U.S.
officials have said the nation was Iran, which tested a
freighter-launched missile in the Caspian Sea in the late 1990s. "It
is true that the big distinction we make between intercontinental,
medium-range and shorter-range ballistic missiles doesn't make a lot
of sense if you're going to move the missile closer to the target," he
said.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is missile defense? An expensive fraud Bush needs Poland as a future nuclear battlefield Paul J. Adam Military Aviation 1 August 9th 04 08:29 PM
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) Anonymous Spamless Military Aviation 0 April 21st 04 05:09 AM
"Missile Defense for the 21st Century" Mike Military Aviation 0 March 8th 04 09:35 PM
Warszaw Pact War Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War ...) Matt Wiser Military Aviation 0 December 7th 03 09:20 PM
Airborne ballistic missile defense? Henry J. Cobb Military Aviation 1 August 20th 03 09:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.