If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Need help with a rocket motor ID
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:38:32 +1030, "Dave Kearton"
wrote: I've just received a few pics of a small rocket motor, from a friend of mine. Long shot - but I think that text is 'SN634' on IMGP0495 right hand side - speck of dirt at top left of the 'N' making it look like 'iY'. Looking for more now - and the writing looks Aussie :-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Need help with a rocket motor ID
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:38:32 +1030, "Dave Kearton"
wrote: I've just received a few pics of a small rocket motor, from a friend of mine. It's about 2Kg and about 45cm long with a 10cm wide nozzle. It's a liquid fuel motor and doesn't look like it has any electrical connections. We're all guessing it could be some form of reaction nozzle for (maybe) a Gemini or Apollo capsule. Can I buy a vowel please ? Dave, Not much of a vowel but here's the stuff I got from a bud who's pretty heavy into rocketry (I am not). He didn't know what it was, specifically, but here's a bit more info you can add to the stew. One other note, Q is correct about the "SN63(4??), which is preceeded by what looks like a part #, which looks to me like it may be " ?07705" Cheers, jc "About all I can add to this discussion is that I'd agree it's probably designed for hypergols since there's no provision for ignition. Hypergols are binary propellants that use 2 liquids that spontaneously combust on contact. The only 2 I can name are furfuryl alcohol with hydrogen peroxide and the WW2 German bstoff and cstoff. That was the stuff used in the ME163 Comet rocket plane, I'm pretty sure one of the stoffs was hydrazine. That's some nasty stuff, it dissolves flesh. I've heard stories about accidental leaks and human soup. Yuck! Looking at the pictures a couple of other things strike me. Obviously there's no gimbal on the nozzle so it's not a manuvering jet. I'd guess either a seperation motor for a really big stage or possibly some kind of retro-fire thing. The other thing is the way the fluid lines wrap around the can looks like preheat to me. That either means a fuel that doesn't vaporize easily, like kerosene, or a cold soaked environment. That goes along with the idea that it's designed for vacuum. Where did the guy get it? Looks like government surplus to me. Hope my input helps." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Need help with a rocket motor ID
"jc" wrote in message
... Dave, Not much of a vowel but here's the stuff I got from a bud who's pretty heavy into rocketry (I am not). He didn't know what it was, specifically, but here's a bit more info you can add to the stew. One other note, Q is correct about the "SN63(4??), which is preceeded by what looks like a part #, which looks to me like it may be " ?07705" Cheers, jc "About all I can add to this discussion is that I'd agree it's probably designed for hypergols since there's no provision for ignition. Hypergols are binary propellants that use 2 liquids that spontaneously combust on contact. The only 2 I can name are furfuryl alcohol with hydrogen peroxide and the WW2 German bstoff and cstoff. That was the stuff used in the ME163 Comet rocket plane, I'm pretty sure one of the stoffs was hydrazine. That's some nasty stuff, it dissolves flesh. I've heard stories about accidental leaks and human soup. Yuck! Looking at the pictures a couple of other things strike me. Obviously there's no gimbal on the nozzle so it's not a manuvering jet. I'd guess either a seperation motor for a really big stage or possibly some kind of retro-fire thing. The other thing is the way the fluid lines wrap around the can looks like preheat to me. That either means a fuel that doesn't vaporize easily, like kerosene, or a cold soaked environment. That goes along with the idea that it's designed for vacuum. Where did the guy get it? Looks like government surplus to me. Hope my input helps." Thanks, every little bit helps. I'm currently trying to get comparision pics of the Rocketdyne LR64-NA-4 from the AQM-37. It was a fairly common engine - over 5K in service and possibly matches the size of the engine with the airframe. -- Cheers Dave Kearton |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Need help with a rocket motor ID
well this is a mixing chamber for a chrop duster. looks like its a old
grummend agcat around the 1960 design, the corossion has me worried... "Dave Kearton" wrote in message ... "jc" wrote in message ... Dave, Not much of a vowel but here's the stuff I got from a bud who's pretty heavy into rocketry (I am not). He didn't know what it was, specifically, but here's a bit more info you can add to the stew. One other note, Q is correct about the "SN63(4??), which is preceeded by what looks like a part #, which looks to me like it may be " ?07705" Cheers, jc "About all I can add to this discussion is that I'd agree it's probably designed for hypergols since there's no provision for ignition. Hypergols are binary propellants that use 2 liquids that spontaneously combust on contact. The only 2 I can name are furfuryl alcohol with hydrogen peroxide and the WW2 German bstoff and cstoff. That was the stuff used in the ME163 Comet rocket plane, I'm pretty sure one of the stoffs was hydrazine. That's some nasty stuff, it dissolves flesh. I've heard stories about accidental leaks and human soup. Yuck! Looking at the pictures a couple of other things strike me. Obviously there's no gimbal on the nozzle so it's not a manuvering jet. I'd guess either a seperation motor for a really big stage or possibly some kind of retro-fire thing. The other thing is the way the fluid lines wrap around the can looks like preheat to me. That either means a fuel that doesn't vaporize easily, like kerosene, or a cold soaked environment. That goes along with the idea that it's designed for vacuum. Where did the guy get it? Looks like government surplus to me. Hope my input helps." Thanks, every little bit helps. I'm currently trying to get comparision pics of the Rocketdyne LR64-NA-4 from the AQM-37. It was a fairly common engine - over 5K in service and possibly matches the size of the engine with the airframe. -- Cheers Dave Kearton |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Need help with a rocket motor ID
well this is a mixing chamber for a chrop duster. looks like its a old
grummend agcat around the 1960 design, the corossion has me worried... "Dave Kearton" wrote in message ... "jc" wrote in message ... Dave, Not much of a vowel but here's the stuff I got from a bud who's pretty heavy into rocketry (I am not). He didn't know what it was, specifically, but here's a bit more info you can add to the stew. One other note, Q is correct about the "SN63(4??), which is preceeded by what looks like a part #, which looks to me like it may be " ?07705" Cheers, jc "About all I can add to this discussion is that I'd agree it's probably designed for hypergols since there's no provision for ignition. Hypergols are binary propellants that use 2 liquids that spontaneously combust on contact. The only 2 I can name are furfuryl alcohol with hydrogen peroxide and the WW2 German bstoff and cstoff. That was the stuff used in the ME163 Comet rocket plane, I'm pretty sure one of the stoffs was hydrazine. That's some nasty stuff, it dissolves flesh. I've heard stories about accidental leaks and human soup. Yuck! Looking at the pictures a couple of other things strike me. Obviously there's no gimbal on the nozzle so it's not a manuvering jet. I'd guess either a seperation motor for a really big stage or possibly some kind of retro-fire thing. The other thing is the way the fluid lines wrap around the can looks like preheat to me. That either means a fuel that doesn't vaporize easily, like kerosene, or a cold soaked environment. That goes along with the idea that it's designed for vacuum. Where did the guy get it? Looks like government surplus to me. Hope my input helps." Thanks, every little bit helps. I'm currently trying to get comparision pics of the Rocketdyne LR64-NA-4 from the AQM-37. It was a fairly common engine - over 5K in service and possibly matches the size of the engine with the airframe. -- Cheers Dave Kearton |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Need help with a rocket motor ID - no more calls, we have our winner.
"Dave Kearton" wrote in
message ... I'm currently trying to get comparision pics of the Rocketdyne LR64-NA-4 from the AQM-37. It was a fairly common engine - over 5K in service and possibly matches the size of the engine with the airframe. As Esmarelda whispered to Quasimodo "It's only a hunch, but I can't ignore it" I'm pretty sure the beast we're looking at is an LR64 variant, leastways that's close enough for me. I've sent a pic off to PWR and hopefully they'll own up to it as well. http://www.aeroconsystems.com/motors/lr64.htm Thanks to everyone for their thoughts - except for the retard on sci.space.history who told me to do my own research. I think my way was a lot more educational. -- Cheers Dave Kearton |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Need help with a rocket motor ID - no more calls, we have our winner.
"Dave Kearton" wrote:
I'm currently trying to get comparision pics of the Rocketdyne LR64-NA-4 from the AQM-37. It was a fairly common engine - over 5K in service and possibly matches the size of the engine with the airframe. As Esmarelda whispered to Quasimodo "It's only a hunch, but I can't ignore it" I'm pretty sure the beast we're looking at is an LR64 variant, leastways that's close enough for me. I've sent a pic off to PWR and hopefully they'll own up to it as well. http://www.aeroconsystems.com/motors/lr64.htm Thanks to everyone for their thoughts - except for the retard on sci.space.history who told me to do my own research. I think my way was a lot more educational. I think you have it. Here's another picture, from http://www.astronautix.com/engines/p41ainer.htm --Bill Thompson |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Need help with a rocket motor ID - no more calls, we have our winner.
"William R Thompson" wrote in message
link.net... "Dave Kearton" wrote: I'm currently trying to get comparision pics of the Rocketdyne LR64-NA-4 from the AQM-37. It was a fairly common engine - over 5K in service and possibly matches the size of the engine with the airframe. As Esmarelda whispered to Quasimodo "It's only a hunch, but I can't ignore it" I'm pretty sure the beast we're looking at is an LR64 variant, leastways that's close enough for me. I've sent a pic off to PWR and hopefully they'll own up to it as well. http://www.aeroconsystems.com/motors/lr64.htm Thanks to everyone for their thoughts - except for the retard on sci.space.history who told me to do my own research. I think my way was a lot more educational. I think you have it. Here's another picture, from http://www.astronautix.com/engines/p41ainer.htm --Bill Thompson The Stromberg twin barrel carbie on that one would make it go like a cut cat. -- Cheers Dave Kearton |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Need help with a rocket motor ID - no more calls, we have our winner.
"William R Thompson" wrote in message
link.net... "Dave Kearton" wrote: I'm currently trying to get comparision pics of the Rocketdyne LR64-NA-4 from the AQM-37. It was a fairly common engine - over 5K in service and possibly matches the size of the engine with the airframe. As Esmarelda whispered to Quasimodo "It's only a hunch, but I can't ignore it" I'm pretty sure the beast we're looking at is an LR64 variant, leastways that's close enough for me. I've sent a pic off to PWR and hopefully they'll own up to it as well. http://www.aeroconsystems.com/motors/lr64.htm Thanks to everyone for their thoughts - except for the retard on sci.space.history who told me to do my own research. I think my way was a lot more educational. I think you have it. Here's another picture, from http://www.astronautix.com/engines/p41ainer.htm --Bill Thompson The Stromberg twin barrel carbie on that one would make it go like a cut cat. -- Cheers Dave Kearton |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Need help with a rocket motor ID - no more calls, we have our winner.
"Dave Kearton" wrote:
I'm currently trying to get comparision pics of the Rocketdyne LR64-NA-4 from the AQM-37. It was a fairly common engine - over 5K in service and possibly matches the size of the engine with the airframe. As Esmarelda whispered to Quasimodo "It's only a hunch, but I can't ignore it" I'm pretty sure the beast we're looking at is an LR64 variant, leastways that's close enough for me. I've sent a pic off to PWR and hopefully they'll own up to it as well. http://www.aeroconsystems.com/motors/lr64.htm Thanks to everyone for their thoughts - except for the retard on sci.space.history who told me to do my own research. I think my way was a lot more educational. I think you have it. Here's another picture, from http://www.astronautix.com/engines/p41ainer.htm --Bill Thompson |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mooney Rocket | Al | Owning | 7 | September 1st 06 07:31 PM |
FS: Harmon Rocket II | Rob S. | Piloting | 0 | March 4th 06 11:50 PM |
Rocket Man.... | Gary Emerson | Soaring | 2 | November 5th 05 04:49 AM |
WW-II rocket motor on E-bay - opinions ? | BeepBeep | Naval Aviation | 32 | August 11th 05 03:29 PM |
TWO EXTREMELY RARE ROCKET BOOKS ON EBAY - INCREDIBLE ROCKET HISTORY! | TruthReigns | Military Aviation | 0 | July 10th 04 11:54 AM |