If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
United Airlines, We put the "Hospital" in "Hospitality"!
"RD Sandman" wrote in message ... Petzl wrote in : On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:58:00 -0500, RD Sandman wrote: Petzl wrote in news On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:30:47 -0500, RD Sandman wrote: Sylvia Else wrote in news:el5f1bFb5krU1 : To my mind, the proper solution to the overbooking problem is either to ban it outright (given that it's deliberate, not just a mistake), Overbooking is intentional. It is done to try and ensure paying passengers for all flights. The plane was full, not over booked. Not enough is known for me to argue with you. The point is that the plane was full, airlines can and do overbook to ensure that all seats are filled. Everyone was seated, so at the point the plane was full not overbooked (UA spin). Perhaps. We don't know if there aother passengers in the terminal that were not added to the flight. Additionally, when the four airline employees were added to the manifest, the flight beame "overbooked". If so, then the "overbooked" passengers that were added at the last minute, ie the UA employees, should have been the first to be booted per UA own Contract of Carriage. After all, check the definitions: "Oversold Flight means a flight where there are more Passengers holding valid confirmed Tickets that check-in for the flight within the prescribed check-in time than there are available seats." The UE employees were not holding valid confirmed tickets nor did they check-in for the flight within the prescribed check-in time. Otherwise, all the seats wouldn't have been filled by boarded passengers. QED. Their own Contract of Carriage....which is the legally binding contract....does NOT allow them to act as they did. More spin is that four passengers were "randomly" selected? Yes, it is a computer program that does the selection. Computers do not make selections for any other reason than what is programmed into them, and it is very difficult to make that purely random. And yet, 'random' isn't an acceptable manner of selection per their own CoC. Indeed, here's a nice write up on the whole thing as it concerns United's contract and whether it violated the terms of that contract. https://www.bloomberg.com/view/artic...requent-flyers |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
aircraft - "National Museum of the United States Air Force.jpg" (1/2) 637.5 KBytes 204 KB | D. St-Sanvain | Aviation Photos | 0 | December 2nd 10 08:41 PM |
"Pop" Hotchkis bellys in a Bowen Airlines Lockheed Orion, 1920s. | Don Pyeatt | Aviation Photos | 1 | February 20th 09 10:51 PM |
"Chinese Land Attack Cruise Missile Developments and theirImplications for the United States" | Mike[_7_] | Naval Aviation | 8 | December 24th 08 01:32 AM |
Who remembers "Universal Airlines" my first flight many, many years ago | Observer | Aviation Photos | 1 | January 19th 08 04:21 PM |