A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » General Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

763 Cruising Speed.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 29th 04, 03:18 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 763 Cruising Speed.

Can anyone please tell me what the average cruising speed of a 763 is ?
Thanks.


  #2  
Old January 29th 04, 03:44 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
...
Can anyone please tell me what the average cruising speed of a 763 is ?
Thanks.


0.82 mach


  #4  
Old January 29th 04, 05:40 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Saryon" wrote in message
...

What's a 763?


Boeing 767-300.


A Boeing 767-300 is a B763.


  #5  
Old January 29th 04, 06:15 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Saryon" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:40:06 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"Saryon" wrote in message
.. .

What's a 763?


Boeing 767-300.


A Boeing 767-300 is a B763.


Assuming the original poster meant B763 is not unreasonable. People
say/post 744 or 733 and have it interpreted to Boeing 747-400 or
Boeing 737-300 all the time. Not saying it's technically correct, or
even right to do, but even I'm not that pedantic in the absense of
similar designators to confuse it with...


Even though I knew what he ment, if you look at it he is dislexic.

Correctly and common is: 673


  #6  
Old January 30th 04, 07:35 PM
Jeb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Saryon" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:40:06 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"Saryon" wrote in message
.. .

What's a 763?


Boeing 767-300.


A Boeing 767-300 is a B763.


Assuming the original poster meant B763 is not unreasonable. People
say/post 744 or 733 and have it interpreted to Boeing 747-400 or
Boeing 737-300 all the time. Not saying it's technically correct, or
even right to do, but even I'm not that pedantic in the absense of
similar designators to confuse it with...


Even though I knew what he ment, if you look at it he is dislexic.

Correctly and common is: 673


Whatever, 763 is how the aircraft is described in airline schedules.
Boeings are 7*7, the last 7 is redundant and replaced by the first
number of the variant.
  #7  
Old January 30th 04, 07:37 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jeb" wrote in message
om...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message

...
"Saryon" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:40:06 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"Saryon" wrote in message
.. .

What's a 763?


Boeing 767-300.


A Boeing 767-300 is a B763.

Assuming the original poster meant B763 is not unreasonable. People
say/post 744 or 733 and have it interpreted to Boeing 747-400 or
Boeing 737-300 all the time. Not saying it's technically correct, or
even right to do, but even I'm not that pedantic in the absense of
similar designators to confuse it with...


Even though I knew what he ment, if you look at it he is dislexic.

Correctly and common is: 673


Whatever, 763 is how the aircraft is described in airline schedules.
Boeings are 7*7, the last 7 is redundant and replaced by the first
number of the variant.


Everywhere outside this post I have seen the first 7 dropped. Perhaps you
are banging the bong a little hard?


  #8  
Old January 30th 04, 08:27 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Saryon" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:37:20 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Jeb" wrote in message
. com...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message

...
"Saryon" wrote in message
news On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:40:06 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"Saryon" wrote in message
.. .

What's a 763?


Boeing 767-300.


A Boeing 767-300 is a B763.

Assuming the original poster meant B763 is not unreasonable.

People
say/post 744 or 733 and have it interpreted to Boeing 747-400 or
Boeing 737-300 all the time. Not saying it's technically correct,

or
even right to do, but even I'm not that pedantic in the absense of
similar designators to confuse it with...

Even though I knew what he ment, if you look at it he is dislexic.

Correctly and common is: 673

Whatever, 763 is how the aircraft is described in airline schedules.
Boeings are 7*7, the last 7 is redundant and replaced by the first
number of the variant.


Everywhere outside this post I have seen the first 7 dropped. Perhaps

you
are banging the bong a little hard?


Why yes, perhaps you are?

FAAO 7340.1? http://www1.faa.gov/atpubs/cnt/5-2.htm - FAA list of
equipment designators? I know that's what's used when filing flight
plans.


Try again, that page is a loser for you.


  #9  
Old January 30th 04, 08:41 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Saryon" wrote in message
...

B762 L2J/H 767-200 BOEING
B763 L2J/H 767-300 BOEING
B764 L2J/H 767-400 BOEING

Your assertion was that it's a "673" because you always drop the
leading 7. I can't find 673 anywhere in the list.


I expect those would be apropriate contractions for your correspondence with
FAA, but here in the real world, the first 7 is dropped. Note carefully
that you have been corrected by an engineer, an air traffic controller and
pilots. If you want to use an insider secret code, don't expect anyone to
know what you are gibbering about.


  #10  
Old January 30th 04, 08:53 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Saryon" wrote in message
news
"insider secret code"? Wow, I didn't think the type designators that
are used on flight plans and published openly on the FAA's own website
was some sort of "secret insider code" that any traffic controlers or
pilots have yet corrected me on.


You should pay more attention, sock.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) Guy Alcala Military Aviation 3 August 13th 04 12:18 PM
Va and turbulent air penetration speed. Doug Instrument Flight Rules 70 January 11th 04 08:35 PM
Jet fighter top speed at military power David L. Pulver Military Aviation 18 December 1st 03 07:13 PM
#1 Jet of World War II Christopher Military Aviation 203 September 1st 03 03:04 AM
New Film: The Need For Speed - Going to war on drugs Phil Carpenter Military Aviation 0 July 23rd 03 07:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.