A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Manifold Pressure at Rest



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old August 20th 04, 08:36 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kage,

let's try again, shall we?

Assume close to a standard atmosphere. Engine off.

Case 1: We're at a sea level airfield.

1. The MP will read the ambient pressure at field elevation, which is
29.92.

2. The altimeter, when set to the altimeter setting of the day of
29.92, will read the field elevation of 0 feet.

3. When the altimeter is set to indicate 0 feet at the field elevation,
the altimeter's Kollsmann window will read the ambient pressure at
field elevation, which is 29.92.


Case 2: We're at an airfield at 2000 feet elevation.

1. The MP will read the ambient pressure at field elevation, which is
27.92.

2. The altimeter, when set to the altimeter setting of the day of
29.92, will read the field elevation of 2000 feet.

3. When the altimeter is set to indicate 0 feet at the field elevation,
the altimeter's Kollsmann window will read the ambient pressure at
field elevation, which is 27.92.

Thus, when you set the altimeter as described in 3. (i.e. to indicate
the field elevation) it will show the same as the MP gauge. FWIW, the
altimeter setting that produces an indication of 0 feet at the field
elevation is called QFE in ICAO speak (which the US isn't good at ;-)).
The "altimeter setting" you guys in the US know is called QNH elsewhere
in the world.

This setting is what I was trying to describe in my posts. Where,
pray, tell, is that "not even close" and "completely erroneous"? On the
contrary, your "It [the MP gauge] should be close to the setting [on
the altimeter] seen when field elevation is dialed in." is definitely
wrong.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #22  
Old August 20th 04, 08:36 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Robert,

I thought
you were referring to zero MSL but it would be zero AGL.


Yep. I tried to explain in detail in another post to kage.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #23  
Old August 20th 04, 08:42 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thomas,

(i.e. to indicate
the field elevation)


Oops, messed up there. That should read "i.e. to indicate 0 feet at the
field elevation".

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #24  
Old August 20th 04, 05:23 PM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"kage" wrote in message ...
Thomas,

Well it might be wrong, but it will be close, like I said----not exact. And
it is a good preflight check to see if there are gross errors in the
instruments.


True, but atmospheric pressure isn't involved in this test at all. You
are comparing altimeter setting with altimeter reading. You are just
verifying the altimeter setting. Pressure really has nothing to do
with it. They should never have labeled the altimeter with numbers
like 29.92. They should have just called them 123, etc.

If the actual pressure did change, it would change both your altimeter
reading and altimeter setting, so pressure isn't really relevant to
testing your altimeter against the altimeter setting.

-Robert
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Special prop to increase manifold pressure Fly Owning 7 December 2nd 04 07:23 PM
Cabin Pressure Altitude Greg Esres Piloting 4 March 24th 04 08:35 PM
Manifold pressure gauge problem Dave Russell Aerobatics 3 January 29th 04 03:46 AM
Wanted clever PA32 engineer's thoughts - Gear extention problem on Piper Lance [email protected] Owning 5 July 22nd 03 12:35 AM
Pressure Differential in heat Exchangers Bruce A. Frank Home Built 4 July 3rd 03 05:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.