If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
We also do both at our airport here in the US. We also
have a winch captain or you might know them as GOD (Glider Operations Director). It's the same as Del writes below. Sam At 05:42 29 December 2007, Del C wrote: Why not? Many European clubs offer both winch and aerotow launches, including my own. Some members only ever aerotow and some (usually the less well off) only winch launch. Most members do both, depending on the conditions, what they can afford, and what they want to do. A winch launch costs less than a third of the cost of an aerotow, so it is a cheap way of staying current during the winter when it is rarely thermic in the UK. About two-thirds of our launches are on the winch, so we can make do with fewer tug aircraft than would be the case if we were an all aerotow operation. The only safety issue is to make sure that aerotows and winch launches don't happen at the same time, to eliminate the risk of the tug flying into the winch cable. We have a 'launch point controller' to make sure that this is the case. Del Copeland At 03:42 29 December 2007, Mike Schumann wrote: snip In order to be a safe and successful with winch launching, you need to make a 100% commitment. You can't run winches and tows in parallel, if people are going to get and stay proficient in winch launching. In addition, the only way winches are economically justifiable is if you totally eliminate the overhead, operating, and maintenance costs associated with a tow plane. |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
On Dec 28, 11:23 pm, Marc Ramsey wrote:
toad wrote: One big problem with winch launching in the US is finding somewhere to get trained. I have been looking for a place to get the training and have found no place close enough to get the training and 2 locations which I could travel to and get a concentrated training. Anybody want to add any operations to that list ? Where are you located? Connecticut Todd Smith 3S |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
Hmmm! I don't think that we want to call our launch
point controllers GODs. Some of them are power mad as it is! Only kidding folks! Many of the weekend and evening ones at our club are volunteers. They just need to be responsible members who have undergone a short course in the safety aspects of the job. It also helps if they can develop eyes in the backs of their heads, voices like foghorns to shout at people who are just about to walk in front of a landing glider or a tug taking off, and a steely manner to deal with members who do stupid things on the ground or in the air. Happy New Year Del C P.S. This is another posting that disappeared into the gp.net black hole at the first attempt! At 14:48 29 December 2007, Sam Discusflyer wrote: We also do both at our airport here in the US. We also have a winch captain or you might know them as GOD (Glider Operations Director). It's the same as Del writes below. Sam At 05:42 29 December 2007, Del C wrote: Why not? Many European clubs offer both winch and aerotow launches, including my own. Some members only ever aerotow and some (usually the less well off) only winch launch. Most members do both, depending on the conditions, what they can afford, and what they want to do. A winch launch costs less than a third of the cost of an aerotow, so it is a cheap way of staying current during the winter when it is rarely thermic in the UK. About two-thirds of our launches are on the winch, so we can make do with fewer tug aircraft than would be the case if we were an all aerotow operation. The only safety issue is to make sure that aerotows and winch launches don't happen at the same time, to eliminate the risk of the tug flying into the winch cable. We have a 'launch point controller' to make sure that this is the case. Del Copeland At 03:42 29 December 2007, Mike Schumann wrote: snip In order to be a safe and successful with winch launching, you need to make a 100% commitment. You can't run winches and tows in parallel, if people are going to get and stay proficient in winch launching. In addition, the only way winches are economically justifiable is if you totally eliminate the overhead, operating, and maintenance costs associated with a tow plane. |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
toad wrote:
On Dec 28, 11:23 pm, Marc Ramsey wrote: toad wrote: One big problem with winch launching in the US is finding somewhere to get trained. I have been looking for a place to get the training and have found no place close enough to get the training and 2 locations which I could travel to and get a concentrated training. Anybody want to add any operations to that list ? Where are you located? Connecticut Have you tried Mohawk Soaring? http://mohawksoaring.org/ I'm not sure if they still have one, but they did fairly recently... Marc |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
On Dec 29, 8:42 pm, Marc Ramsey wrote:
toad wrote: On Dec 28, 11:23 pm, Marc Ramsey wrote: toad wrote: One big problem with winch launching in the US is finding somewhere to get trained. I have been looking for a place to get the training and have found no place close enough to get the training and 2 locations which I could travel to and get a concentrated training. Anybody want to add any operations to that list ? Where are you located? Connecticut Have you tried Mohawk Soaring? http://mohawksoaring.org/ I'm not sure if they still have one, but they did fairly recently... Marc Mohawk's website mentions it, but I think it's seasonal rather than a regular activity. I've just added Finger Lakes SC. I believe they are using dacron, or were. Need to check with them on the details. There's a picture of their winch (former PGC winch) in the March 2007 newsletter but nothing else I could find. Frank |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
Soaring in the Future???...........Was the topic! Hard to predict.
Much of the world still calls the sport "Gliding" Also, what future? 5 years 20 or 40 years? Launch methods may have something to do with it. In Germany now, some clubs are practicing bungee launches again, mostly to show the kids some fun? On the other hand, the fathers and Grandfathers (Geezers) not only try to fly 1000 km Distances during the summer but also during their Winter in the southern hemisphere. There are several soaring sites in Namibia alone, that you can check up on at the Online Contest site (OLC).....what they are flying, and the hours and Distances they are loging. Those 1000 km hunters are almost exclusively flying selflaunchers, but have started soaring on winches a long time ago, with very few exeptions. IMHO, selflaunching is the future, but it may take some time, since there are so many pure sailplanes still around, that need towing. Also, those self launch glas slippers that BTW travel each fall and spring between Europe and S-Afrika (Containers) are at the top end of performance, they will be around for a while. I am all for Winch Launching, I started that way too. I could see some large commercially operated training sites, winch operated, offering reasonable training,.sprinkled across the country, but soaring made easy, would be a self launcher at your closest GA -airport, that you can reach on that bicycle!... Remeber, all the other launch methods need additional man power, which really is a $ (money) item. The tow pilot, the wing runner, winch operator. I think in the distant future the the self launch will have to change in the way that they can easily taxi, move on the ground unassisted. The expensive ones will most likely do that first and out of that insight there might be evolving a self launch V-Sailplane, that almost anybody can play with? In the not so distant future not much change, unless some people make some huge efforts. Soarski Gliders Of Aspen (geezer) .. |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
In the States it seems that you pay everyone from the
instructors and tow pilots down to the guy who runs with your wingtip. This makes gliding there rather expensive. Have you considered the 'mutual self help' system we have in the UK, where the vast majority of these tasks are carried out by suitably qualified club members who don't get paid? Professional instructors, tug pilots and winch drivers are very much in the minority, except at the biggest clubs who run a seven-day-a-week operation. A self launching capacity seems to add about £20k to the cost of a new glider, and also makes it more expensive to insure and maintain. You will also need to qualify for an additional licence. It's also not quite the same thing as a pure glider. Having said that, if I won the National Lottery I would probably buy a self launcher. Del Copeland At 04:12 31 December 2007, wrote: I am all for Winch Launching, I started that way too. I could see some large commercially operated training sites, winch operated, offering reasonable training,.sprinkled across the country, but soaring made easy, would be a self launcher at your closest GA -airport, that you can reach on that bicycle!... Remeber, all the other launch methods need additional man power, which really is a $ (money) item. The tow pilot, the wing runner, winch operator. I think in the distant future the the self launch will have to change in the way that they can easily taxi, move on the ground unassisted. The expensive ones will most likely do that first and out of that insight there might be evolving a self launch V-Sailplane, that almost anybody can play with? In the not so distant future not much change, unless some people make some huge efforts. Soarski Gliders Of Aspen (geezer) .. |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
Many of the clubs in the US are mutual self help. One of the attractions
for motor-gliders is not just the fact that you don't need help, but more importantly that you can fly from your local metro airport, instead of having to drive an hour or two to a rural location that has a glider operation. Then add the ability to do downwind cross country dashes, and be able to fly home when you are done, and you start getting peoples attention, particularly those who have more money than time. Mike Schumann "Del C" wrote in message ... In the States it seems that you pay everyone from the instructors and tow pilots down to the guy who runs with your wingtip. This makes gliding there rather expensive. Have you considered the 'mutual self help' system we have in the UK, where the vast majority of these tasks are carried out by suitably qualified club members who don't get paid? Professional instructors, tug pilots and winch drivers are very much in the minority, except at the biggest clubs who run a seven-day-a-week operation. A self launching capacity seems to add about £20k to the cost of a new glider, and also makes it more expensive to insure and maintain. You will also need to qualify for an additional licence. It's also not quite the same thing as a pure glider. Having said that, if I won the National Lottery I would probably buy a self launcher. Del Copeland At 04:12 31 December 2007, wrote: I am all for Winch Launching, I started that way too. I could see some large commercially operated training sites, winch operated, offering reasonable training,.sprinkled across the country, but soaring made easy, would be a self launcher at your closest GA -airport, that you can reach on that bicycle!... Remeber, all the other launch methods need additional man power, which really is a $ (money) item. The tow pilot, the wing runner, winch operator. I think in the distant future the the self launch will have to change in the way that they can easily taxi, move on the ground unassisted. The expensive ones will most likely do that first and out of that insight there might be evolving a self launch V-Sailplane, that almost anybody can play with? In the not so distant future not much change, unless some people make some huge efforts. Soarski Gliders Of Aspen (geezer) .. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
On 29 Dec 2007, 04:02, Marc Ramsey wrote:
Ian wrote: Over 2,500 Blaniks, 1,400 Ka-6's (all variants) and 1,100 Ka-8's were built. I can't offhand think of (or find) any other 1,000+ runs, but there have been some pretty big productions. Given the current worldwide soaring market, however, I can't see how anyone could count on producing 1000+ units of any design, unless it offers wicked high performance for a ridiculously low price. Agreed. I wonder how many gliders there are in service around the world? I understand there are about 3,500 on the BGA register, but I doubt if more than half of these will make it to EASA. There are lots of older gliders lying around unused or semi-used, and I can't see many owners bothering to jump through costly hoops with them. But I digress. I'll guess (finger in the air) 2,000 gliders in the UK, 5,000 in Germany, 5,000 for the rest of Europe, 2,000 for the US, 5,000 for everywhere else. With a bit of bad addition, that's 20,000 worldwide. So a mass-produced run of 1,000 would be a 5% replacement/ augmentation of the worldwide fleet. That's a lot. And just to make matters worse, the long lifespans of plastic gliders mean that second-hand performance is comparatively cheap. You need a fairly robust market (lots of people moving up to the latest and greatest) for these hordes to materialize. When people buy fewer new gliders (as seems to be the case in the US now), they keep their older ones... There are also price-performance issues. I happily fly 34:1 wood. To move up to 40:1 glass would cost me a few (five?) thousand. For 45:1, double it. For 50:1, double it again. For 55:1, double it again. For 60:1, double it again (GPB 80,000 for a second hand ASH-25). So to clear room for a cheap 40:1 mass-produced glider, lots of pilots have to make the jump up to 45+:1 ... which is expensive. Ian |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
There are also price-performance issues. I happily fly 34:1 wood. To
move up to 40:1 glass would cost me a few (five?) thousand. For 45:1, double it. For 50:1, double it again. For 55:1, double it again. For 60:1, double it again (GPB 80,000 for a second hand ASH-25). So to clear room for a cheap 40:1 mass-produced glider, lots of pilots have to make the jump up to 45+:1 ... which is expensive. Bob K is on the road to getting that done. The HP-24 was designed from the start to make use of production tooling and jigging for a serial run of airframes. I have not asked him what he has in to it so far, but my guess is he could be flying around in one of those expensive 45:1 or 50:1 ships. But instead he see's a makrket niche and at the same time is satisfying a dream to design and build his own sailplane. I am helping as much as I can, since I also have the dream of making my own ship from the ground up............when we are done, we will have some nice ships and the molds will be ready to fill for the next pioneer to step up to the plate. Brad HP-24 S/N 2 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Colorado Soaring Pilots/SSA Governor 2007 Seminar and 2006 Soaring Awards Banquet | Frank Whiteley | Soaring | 0 | February 15th 07 04:52 PM |
The Soaring Server is dead; long live the Soaring Servers | John Leibacher | Soaring | 3 | November 1st 04 10:57 PM |
Possible future legal problems with "SOARING" | Bob Thompson | Soaring | 3 | September 26th 04 11:48 AM |
Soaring Server/Worldwide Soaring Turnpoint Exchange back online | John Leibacher | Soaring | 0 | June 21st 04 05:25 PM |
Soaring Server - Worldwide Soaring Turnpoint Exchange | John Leibacher | Soaring | 0 | June 19th 04 04:57 PM |