A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

thank you, AOPA! (new rules issue)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 3rd 04, 10:42 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default thank you, AOPA! (new rules issue)


The Sport Pilot rules process brought with it a change to the
Recreational Pilot rules. Now the Rec Pilot can get a sign-off for
operating in ATC airspace and landing at B, C, and D airspace airports
without being specifically trained for each one.

However, my CFI didn't have and couldn't get the specifics for this
training and a sample endorsement, for the good reason that the FAA
hasn't posted any such information. He suggested I contact AOPA, which
I did at about ten a.m. yesterday.

I promptly got an email back saying that a Rec Pilot couldn't get a
blanket endorsement. I replied that the rules had just been changed.
After a lapse of about three hours, I got another email saying that,
so they had!, and suggesting language for the endorsement. So on
Monday at 9 a.m. I got for a bit of ground school and a sign-off.

This alone has justified my belonging to AOPA for the past six years.
A great organization!


all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
Expedition sailboat charters www.expeditionsail.com
  #2  
Old September 3rd 04, 05:25 PM
Ace Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hold on. You educate AOPA on what the new reg is and they get credit
for being a great organization? How do I get you to be one of my
customers? ;-)

[I know - AOPA provided the language for the endorsement. I just
couldn't resist the little jab.]
  #3  
Old September 3rd 04, 10:36 PM
zatatime
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 05:42:03 -0400, Cub Driver
wrote:

So on
Monday at 9 a.m. I got for a bit of ground school and a sign-off.



You aren't required to get dual in one of these airspace types?

z
  #5  
Old September 4th 04, 10:52 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 21:36:06 GMT, zatatime
wrote:

You aren't required to get dual in one of these airspace types?


I've had ten hours in controlled airspace with another instructor,
doing stalls/aerobatics at Chandler AZ.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
Expedition sailboat charters www.expeditionsail.com
  #6  
Old September 4th 04, 03:13 PM
zatatime
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 05:52:43 -0400, Cub Driver
wrote:

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 21:36:06 GMT, zatatime
wrote:

You aren't required to get dual in one of these airspace types?


I've had ten hours in controlled airspace with another instructor,
doing stalls/aerobatics at Chandler AZ.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
Expedition sailboat charters www.expeditionsail.com


Thanks. It just didn't make sense to me that this would be a "ground
instruction" endorsement.

Appreciate the reply.

z
  #7  
Old September 5th 04, 08:02 AM
Hilton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cub Driver wrote:
I promptly got an email back saying that a Rec Pilot couldn't get a
blanket endorsement. I replied that the rules had just been changed.
After a lapse of about three hours, I got another email saying that,
so they had!, and suggesting language for the endorsement.


What makes you think that some 'suggested' text by some non-FAA organization
has any legality whatsoever?

Hilton


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
I just read the AOPA ePilot Flight Training Edition -- Vol. 4, Issue 4 from Roger Bartholomee Owning 34 February 27th 04 02:50 AM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 139 November 12th 03 08:26 PM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Piloting 133 November 12th 03 08:26 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.