If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Rutan on Global Warming
On Aug 10, 12:46*am, James Robinson wrote:
"Flaps_50!" wrote: On Aug 9, 2:16*pm, "Dan Luke" wrote: *It is tepid, equivocal and obviously written to appease members who are violently opposed to the idea of AGW, while still not denying the overwhelming scientific evidence for same. * You need to remember that the only 'evidence' for AGW comes from seriously flawed computer models. FACT That is simply not a fact, in spite of your contention. Data has been collected from core samples taken from glaciers on the rate of temperature change over many thousands of years, and it has shown that the earth's temperature has been increasing at a faster rate since the industrial revolution than any other time in history. *That evidence supports the fact that the rate of climate change has substantially increased, contrary to your contention that there is no evidence. *The question then becomes if this is simply normal climate change, but at an extreme rate, or if humans activity has been the cause of the acceleration. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Rutan on Global Warming
"DL" == Dan Luke writes:
DL Gosh, Burt Rutan is climate genius, too! He knows more than DL the scientists. Impressive! Who knew?! Next, Sarah Palin will give a speech on health care policy. -- If I could be a bird, I'd be a Flying Purple People Eater because then people would sing about me and I could fly down and eat them because I hate that song. - Jack Handey |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Rutan on Global Warming
"Mike Granby" wrote in message ... Anyone else see his Oshkosh tirade? Excellent stuff! Global Warming, yet another pseudo-religion posing as science. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming? or Cooling?
I suspect many here will find this interesting.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintAr...rticleId=14504 http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=...meta=&aq=f&oq= Happy landings, |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming? or Cooling?
"Private" wrote in message ... I suspect many here will find this interesting. http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintAr...rticleId=14504 http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=...meta=&aq=f&oq= See also http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121486841811817591.html Happy landings, |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warming? or Cooling?
Private wrote:
I suspect many here will find this interesting. http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintAr...rticleId=14504 http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=...meta=&aq=f&oq= Happy landings, "An independent Media group of Writers, scholars and Activists" (Their web description....) Brian W |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Rutan on Global Warming
On Aug 8, 9:08*am, "Dan Luke" wrote:
"Morgans" *wrote: Dan, if you are as smart as you think you are, you would realize that the two sides of this argument will never agree, and it does not matter what proof you claim to have. *In result, you would just quit arguing, and move on to a different subject, without caring who gets the last word. The same thing could be said to the other people arguing with Dan. -- Oh, you're right of course, Jim. *I've been in enough of these arguments here and elswhere to know it's no longer an issue of facts with most people. But a respected guy like Rutan spouting nonsense in public on a subject he clearly does not understand is something I couldn't let pass without comment. I'll leave it with what I've posted so far; the others can claim victory if they like. Dan T182T at 4R4 Just like Galileo, anyone who points out the inconsistencies and errors in the "established knowledge" are being hounded and villified. What's next -- someone who should know better telling them to "shut up"? Straight from Sol Alinsky, ignore the data and attack the people. I'll take an empirical response using data over 1,000,000,000 opinions any day of the week any month of the year. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Rutan on Global Warming
"curtisgb" wrote in message ... On Aug 8, 9:08 am, "Dan Luke" wrote: "Morgans" wrote: Dan, if you are as smart as you think you are, you would realize that the two sides of this argument will never agree, and it does not matter what proof you claim to have. In result, you would just quit arguing, and move on to a different subject, without caring who gets the last word. The same thing could be said to the other people arguing with Dan. -- Oh, you're right of course, Jim. I've been in enough of these arguments here and elswhere to know it's no longer an issue of facts with most people. You wouldn't know a 'fact' if it bit you in the ass. But a respected guy like Rutan spouting nonsense in public on a subject he clearly does not understand is something I couldn't let pass without comment. I'll leave it with what I've posted so far; the others can claim victory if they like. Dan Dan, the master of the logical fallacy (as he so aptly demonstrated). :Just like Galileo, anyone who points out the inconsistencies and : errors in the "established knowledge" are being hounded and : villified. What's next -- someone who should know better telling them : to "shut up"? Calling them rapists of the planet? Calling them unAmerican? :: Straight from Sol Alinsky, ignore the data and attack the people. :: I'll take an empirical response using data over 1,000,000,000 opinions :: any day of the week any month of the year. Like, how it's demonstrated how CO2 follows temp increases rather than leading them? |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Rutan on Global Warming
"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in message ... "Mike Granby" wrote in message ... Anyone else see his Oshkosh tirade? Excellent stuff! Global Warming, yet another pseudo-religion posing as science. Yes, and that explains why it's collapsing so fast. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Rutan on Global Warming
"curtisgb" wrote Just like Galileo, anyone who points out the inconsistencies and errors in the "established knowledge" are being hounded and villified. What's next -- someone who should know better telling them to "shut up"? Straight from Sol Alinsky, ignore the data and attack the people. I'll take an empirical response using data over 1,000,000,000 opinions any day of the week any month of the year. No, I would liken it to a comparison of the things you should not talk about in a bar. Religion is one of them. The simple fact remains that you will not find a single person reading this thread changing their stance on believing or not believing in global warming. Then, the line about wresting with a pig comes in. You both get dirty, but the pig enjoys it. Am I wrong? Anyone reading this thread willing to admit that they have substantially changed their views on global warming, from the information presented in this thread? Anyone? Just one person? -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Global Warming The debbil made me do it | Denny | Piloting | 442 | April 5th 08 12:26 PM |
My Modest Proposal to End Global Warming, Revitalize General Aviation, and End Our Dependence on Foreign Oil | Skylune | Owning | 0 | October 19th 07 10:47 PM |
My Modest Proposal to End Global Warming, Revitalize General Aviation, and End Our Dependence on Foreign Oil | Skylune | Owning | 0 | October 19th 07 09:21 PM |
I have an opinion on global warming! | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 89 | April 12th 07 12:56 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: CBS Spotlights Aviation's Effect On Global Warming!!! | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 1 | August 3rd 06 07:24 PM |