Stuck at work--need takeoff/landing distances for a 172 please

"Ray" wrote in message
...
[...]
Since
the chart only goes to 40C you still have to extrapolate to the higher
temperature

Or, they can use the density altitude, but pick performance figures for
standard temp from the POH. No extrapolation necessary in that case.

Pete

wow! thanks Peter (and others who contributed). now the hard part will
be getting 4 adults, a small dog, and assorted stuff below the useful
load limit.

Peter Clark wrote in
:

On 13 Jul 2005 12:19:23 -0700, "Yossarian"
wrote:

Excuse my laziness but if anyone feels like checking some distances for
me I would be greatly appreciative

172SP, fully loaded, 73' field elevation (Bermuda Dunes, CA), 120
degrees F, paved runway, assume no wind.

I have a feeling the density altitude isn't going to make this
feasible.

Partial listing, Short-field performance (from 172SP IM), 2550lb:

ground roll/clear 50' obstacle. Pressure altitudes.

temp 0deg 10deg 20deg 30deg 40deg C

SL 860/1465 925/1575 995/1690 1070/1810 1150/1945
1K 940/1600 1010/1720 1090/1850 1170/1990 1260/2135
2K 1025/1755 1110/1890 1195/2035 1285/2190 1380/2355
3K 1125/1925 1215/2080 1310/2240 1410/2420 1515/2605

decrease distance 10% for each 9 knot headwind. Increase distance 10%
for each 2knots of tailwind up to 10 knots.

Luck.

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:34:18 -0500, Yossarian
wrote:

wow! thanks Peter (and others who contributed). now the hard part will
be getting 4 adults, a small dog, and assorted stuff below the useful
load limit.

Half full fuel tanks?

Corky Scott