If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
"Why was a plane able to fly over New York?"
Howdy!
In article , Dylan Smith wrote: On 2006-10-19, Bob Noel wrote: my mistake, you didn't specify corridors only (even though you said "it went on all the time in Houston. It's almost impossible to use the I-10 corridor legally in any fixed wing plane much bigger than a Cessna 150." You talked about flying over cities. So, my question is given that you don't know what "undue hazard means", why do you say that everyone flying over cities are in violation of the 91.119(a)? We don't know for sure - but it's reasonable to assume that flying over a place where the only outlanding options are densely populated with people or people driving cars would, if your engine quit, cause an undue hazard to these people. Can you do better than that? Why is it reasonable to make that assumption? Do the FARs speak to what they mean when they say "undue hazard"? Can you back this up with citations? yours, Michael -- Michael and MJ Houghton | Herveus d'Ormonde and Megan O'Donnelly | White Wolf and the Phoenix narrowwares Bowie, MD, USA | http://whitewolfandphoenix.com Proud member of the SCA Internet Whitewash Squad |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
"Why was a plane able to fly over New York?"
"John Theune" wrote in message news:kaJZg.3974$9z6.926@trndny03... This discussion started on the East River flyway and also included the Houston flyway. What airspace restriction says no more then 1100 feet? |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
"Why was a plane able to fly over New York?"
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:56:43 -0000, Dylan Smith
wrote: On 2006-10-18, Bob Noel wrote: But what does "undue hazard" mean? Surely it can't mean "any hazard", so how much hazard is acceptable? Look at the traffic patterns for the airports. They bring the little guys and big iron in over heavily populated areas in an almost steady string. I'm far more comfortable with the little guy flying around overhead than a jetliner. If he goes down the little guy can break a few windows or start a fire, but a jet liner can clean out a city block or just plain take out a lot of territory. OTOH The chances of either happening are very small. For a city the size of NY with only two planes in the history of aviation hitting a high rise is pretty remarkable. Also note the only deaths were the pilot and copilot. There is very little hazard from small planes flying overhead and the damage one can do is miniscule compared to a jetliner. Sadly - we will only discover that when the FAA prosecutes someone. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Passenger crash-lands plane after pilot suffers heart attack | R.L. | Piloting | 7 | May 7th 05 11:17 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |