A Lovely C-17

She's a beauty.

I'll bet the armed forces can hardly wait for her
three siblings to show up.

Maple1 wrote in news:uNnzi.85095$rX4.48916@pd7urf2no:

SHIVER ME TIMBERS wrote:


When you posted the link I was hoping it would be a
lovely picture of Canada's newest addition to it's
sadly neglected airforce.

They spelled "US AIR FORCE" wrong...

Arr.

Bob ^,,^

redc1c4 wrote:
Digital Voices wrote:
(top posting stupidity fixed)
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:02:14 -0700, John Meyer
wrote:

In article ,
Digital Voices wrote:

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1243409/L/
Trolling for hits, eh?
Another Plankton heard from. Some people get an idea in their head
making room for nothing else. Back to your drawing board troll.

post a pic instead of a link, and maybe we'll think differently.

redc1c4,
(otherwise, you're just trolling for hits. HTH. %-)

As long as what is on his website is aviation related why the hell
should anyone care? It caused no problem at all to open another browser
window. I have never understood the irrational hatred of people who
maintain websites for pictures and post a link instead of using a lot of
bandwidth on the NG.

--
Heaven is where the police are British, the chefs Italian, the mechanics
German, the lovers French and it is all organized by the Swiss.

Hell is where the police are German, the chefs British, the mechanics
French, the lovers Swiss and it is all organized by Italians.

http://new.photos.yahoo.com/paul1cart/albums/

Airliners.net is not his website that is why people are upset. I
personaly dont care if they post a link but with airliners.net the more
hits the higher you photo appears on the list that is why people are
making the point about fishing for hits. Now if this was a non binaries
group then just a link would be more then appropriate.

However like I said who cares you dont need to click on the link.

Paul Elliot wrote:


As long as what is on his website is aviation related why the hell
should anyone care? It caused no problem at all to open another browser
window. I have never understood the irrational hatred of people who
maintain websites for pictures and post a link instead of using a lot of
bandwidth on the NG.

"Digital Voices" wrote in message
...
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1243409/L/



I still think this is one of the most revealing photos of a Globemaster I've
seen.


Sorry.


Regards, PLMerite

PLMerite wrote:

"Digital Voices" wrote in message
...
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1243409/L/

I still think this is one of the most revealing photos of a Globemaster I've
seen.

Sorry.

Regards, PLMerite

[Image]

is that a C-5 taxiing in the lower left?

redc1c4,
just curious. %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide

The next item on the list of "cool things seen at the beach" :




"redc1c4" wrote in message
...
PLMerite wrote:

"Digital Voices" wrote in message
...
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1243409/L/

I still think this is one of the most revealing photos of a Globemaster
I've
seen.

Sorry.

Regards, PLMerite

[Image]

is that a C-5 taxiing in the lower left?

redc1c4,
just curious. %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide

On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:47:36 GMT, Maple1 wrote:

Airliners.net is not his website that is why people are upset. I
personaly dont care if they post a link but with airliners.net the more
hits the higher you photo appears on the list that is why people are
making the point about fishing for hits. Now if this was a non binaries
group then just a link would be more then appropriate.

However like I said who cares you dont need to click on the link.

Paul Elliot wrote:


As long as what is on his website is aviation related why the hell
should anyone care? It caused no problem at all to open another browser
window. I have never understood the irrational hatred of people who
maintain websites for pictures and post a link instead of using a lot of
bandwidth on the NG.



If I was going for hits, I would have posted a great deal more A.Net
links. Also, it was on A.Net a few days. So if any wants to argue I
was trolling for a 'most popular' status. Wrong again.

Me thinks some people need to get lives if it bothers them that much.

It's called s-h-a-r-i-n-g.

"and yuck, those shoes...."
Obligitory Airplane quote

On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:19:25 GMT, Bob Harrington
wrote:

redc1c4 wrote in
:

Digital Voices wrote:
(top posting stupidity fixed)
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:02:14 -0700, John Meyer
wrote:

In article ,
Digital Voices wrote:

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1243409/L/

Trolling for hits, eh?

Another Plankton heard from. Some people get an idea in their head
making room for nothing else. Back to your drawing board troll.

post a pic instead of a link, and maybe we'll think differently.

redc1c4,
(otherwise, you're just trolling for hits. HTH. %-)

It ~is~ a nice picture.

Needs sumpin' though - a mountain perhaps? ;^)

Bob ^,,^


Shasta? Looks like it...