A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Standalone GPS



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 2nd 04, 03:10 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Bob Gardner wrote:

To keep me from looking at every approach plate PDF in the country for some
research I am doing, would you folks give me some examples of standalone
(not RNAV(GPS)) approaches in your areas of operation?

Thanks.

Bob Gardner


There is no procedural or design difference between a "stand-alone" GPS IAP and
an RNAV (GPS) IAP. The GPS IAP is an obsolete term and is deleted as the
procedure is reviewed and reissued.


  #12  
Old December 2nd 04, 03:11 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And, when those approaches are reviewed, BARO VNAV minimums may be added if the
approach otherwise qualifies. If not, the minimums you see today would become
LNAV only minimums.

Bob Gardner wrote:

Several of you asked what I was looking for, and the answer lies in the
minimums box. The AIM goes on at great length about GLS, LPV, VNAV/LNAV,
etc, but the standalone approaches that you have suggested and I have
checked out have straight in and circling minimums, period. I realize that
there may be approaches in areas of the country from which I received no
replies.

I'm not going to lose sleep over the fact that most of the plates in THE
COMPLETE ADVANCED PILOT do not have the minimums boxes discussed in the AIM.

Bob


  #13  
Old December 2nd 04, 03:17 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Bob Gardner wrote:

Nope. Look at a list of approaches for some airports and you will see both
"GPS Rwy 16" and "RNAV(GPS) Rwy 16." My area of interest was the minimums
box, since the ones I ran across when just guessing usually had only
circling approaches. Thought that the approach to Frederick, MD, that Phil
Boyer used in the AOPA video on WAAS would have something other than
circling, but I was wrong.


If I understand your negative sentence construction correctly, you are saying
that the RNAV IAPs at KFDK have only circling minimums? Not so.

  #14  
Old December 2nd 04, 04:34 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Mike Rapoport wrote:

"Bob Gardner" wrote in message
...
To keep me from looking at every approach plate PDF in the country for
some research I am doing, would you folks give me some examples of
standalone (not RNAV(GPS)) approaches in your areas of operation?

Thanks.

Bob Gardner


I thought they changed the name of GPS approaches to RNAV a year or so ago.

Mike
MU-2


That's all it amounted to.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.