A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cobalt



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old December 12th 03, 06:56 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
t...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message

...

Are YOU a physicist now Keith?


No Robert, Willshaw is a "kook troll" claiming engineering experiance in

the
nuclear industry, while demonstrating no understanding of the processes,

or
elements involved. Willshaw's main contribution to ram has been in the

form
of plagarized URL informations.


Keith continues to demonstrate a heck of lot better grasp of reality than
ol' "Splaps Boy the Tarvernaut" has ever shown us. Let's see, if we

consider
the specific claims from the above


Of course, poor Kevin, fails to understand that Phil has no clue. If either
of them did, they would not need to revert to being archive trolls to get
the job done.


  #32  
Old December 12th 03, 07:46 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
.. .

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
.. .

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
...
In article ,
(B2431) wrote:

From:
(robert arndt)

Are YOU a physicist now Keith? No, you aren't... just some

guy
who
likes to act like one.

Rob

OK, arndt, now you have tarver on your side. He's a EE with

jet
mech
experience a long time ago yet claims to be an expert on

everything.

Geez, Tarver and Arndt working together.

I don't want Robert to feel bad about Willshaw's unqualified

abuse.

Certainly, if a bomb with a 5 year half life, producing a highly

radioactive
element, could be made, it would have effected

Effected? As in made it occur?

No, there would be no way to go forward with operations, without a lot

of
equipment the USAF did not have, as there was only preperation for the

area
cooling off in ten days.


Effected?


You need to leave the sentences in one piece to be able to follow, Kevin.
It is clear that you are none too bright and bifrocating a complete

thought
is something your mind is probably incapable of doing the registering for.


Yo, genius...since you are proving to be as dense as usual, I'll give you a
hint: "affected" was the word you were really looking for.


the USAF operational plan to
repopulate flight lines after ten days.

Where did you get this, from the same source you got your "optical

nuke"
from?

Same place.


That figures--so you mean you made it up?


I mean I was in ADC in the 1970s and then signatory to ITT's Paramus

account
on Edwards in the 1980s.


So you did make it up.


What did you do during the Cold War, Kevin?


Sat around waiting to install my share of the V Corps obstacle effort,

which
was already pretty tightly mapped out for us.


Grunts did not need to know much.


Yeah, nothing more than the OPLAN which we were gonna be supporting, right?
Geeze, you are proving to be especially ridiculous today, Tarvernaut.


I held an NSA Secret ticket at 17.


Uhmmm...what is a "NSA Secret" clearance?


Similar to a "DoD Secret" clearance and it's inferior cousin the "DSO
Secret" clearance. Each of the agencies uses a different level of effort

in
their work.


Eh? Got anything to back that one up? That seems to differ with info from
the DSS (security clearances are normally respected across the span of
government agencies). Why do you presist in making things up that you
*never* provide evidence in support of? Are you so out of touch with reality
that you actually think others *believe* this kind of horsecrap?


I have heard of Confidential, and
Secret, and NATO-Secret, and Top Secret with all of its strange
subcategories, but never an "NSA Secret".


It is hardly surprising that you are ignorant of clearances, Kevin.


LOL! Yeah, sure thing there, Splapsy. You get back to us when you come up
with some evidence to support
these latest curious rants of yours, you hear now? Until then we'll file
them with your fictional "optical nuke", etc.

Brooks





  #33  
Old December 12th 03, 07:47 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
t...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message
...

Are YOU a physicist now Keith?

No Robert, Willshaw is a "kook troll" claiming engineering experiance

in
the
nuclear industry, while demonstrating no understanding of the

processes,
or
elements involved. Willshaw's main contribution to ram has been in

the
form
of plagarized URL informations.


Keith continues to demonstrate a heck of lot better grasp of reality

than
ol' "Splaps Boy the Tarvernaut" has ever shown us. Let's see, if we

consider
the specific claims from the above


Of course, poor Kevin, fails to understand that Phil has no clue. If

either
of them did, they would not need to revert to being archive trolls to get
the job done.


Phil? What "Phil" are you talking about? Are you paranoid much?

Brooks




  #36  
Old December 12th 03, 07:50 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
. ..

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
t...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in

message
...

Are YOU a physicist now Keith?

No Robert, Willshaw is a "kook troll" claiming engineering

experiance in the
nuclear industry, while demonstrating no understanding of the

processes, or
elements involved. Willshaw's main contribution to ram has been in

the form
of plagarized URL informations.


Keith continues to demonstrate a heck of lot better grasp of reality

than
ol' "Splaps Boy the Tarvernaut" has ever shown us. Let's see, if we

consider
the specific claims from the above


Of course, poor Kevin, fails to understand that Phil has no clue. If

either
of them did, they would not need to revert to being archive trolls to

get
the job done.


Phil? What "Phil" are you talking about? Are you paranoid much?


It is Phil Miller's archive troll you posted, Brooks.


  #37  
Old December 12th 03, 07:53 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
. ..

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...


snip
Yo, genius...since you are proving to be as dense as usual, I'll give you

a
hint: "affected" was the word you were really looking for.


I got that a while back, Kevin.

Why are you here, Kevin, outside your hemroid like personality banishing you
to discussion groups? I do not believe you are a net contributer to ram and
that makes you a lower form of troll than even Willshaw.


  #38  
Old December 12th 03, 07:53 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"


Certainly, if a bomb with a 5 year half life, producing a highly

radioactive
element, could be made, it would have effected the USAF operational plan

to
repopulate flight lines after ten days.


"Affected"


Yep.


  #39  
Old December 12th 03, 07:59 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
. ..

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
t...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in

message
...

Are YOU a physicist now Keith?

No Robert, Willshaw is a "kook troll" claiming engineering

experiance in the
nuclear industry, while demonstrating no understanding of the

processes, or
elements involved. Willshaw's main contribution to ram has been

in
the form
of plagarized URL informations.


Keith continues to demonstrate a heck of lot better grasp of reality

than
ol' "Splaps Boy the Tarvernaut" has ever shown us. Let's see, if we

consider
the specific claims from the above

Of course, poor Kevin, fails to understand that Phil has no clue. If

either
of them did, they would not need to revert to being archive trolls to

get
the job done.


Phil? What "Phil" are you talking about? Are you paranoid much?


It is Phil Miller's archive troll you posted, Brooks.


Oh, *that* Phil. You must have mistakenly snipped that entertaining link, so
here it is again...

http://members.optusnet.com.au/~phil...FAQ_tarver.htm

I especially liked the ones where you were honking about all of that
allegedly high-level political muscle you have there...a real hoot!

Brooks






  #40  
Old December 12th 03, 08:01 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
. ..

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
. ..

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
t...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in

message
...

Are YOU a physicist now Keith?

No Robert, Willshaw is a "kook troll" claiming engineering

experiance in the
nuclear industry, while demonstrating no understanding of the

processes, or
elements involved. Willshaw's main contribution to ram has been

in the form
of plagarized URL informations.


Keith continues to demonstrate a heck of lot better grasp of

reality than
ol' "Splaps Boy the Tarvernaut" has ever shown us. Let's see, if

we
consider
the specific claims from the above

Of course, poor Kevin, fails to understand that Phil has no clue.

If either
of them did, they would not need to revert to being archive trolls

to get
the job done.

Phil? What "Phil" are you talking about? Are you paranoid much?


It is Phil Miller's archive troll you posted, Brooks.


Oh, *that* Phil.


Yep, clueless Phil.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AIRCRAFT MUNITIONS - THE COBALT BOMB Garrison Hilliard Military Aviation 1 August 29th 03 09:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.