If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message t... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "robert arndt" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... Are YOU a physicist now Keith? No Robert, Willshaw is a "kook troll" claiming engineering experiance in the nuclear industry, while demonstrating no understanding of the processes, or elements involved. Willshaw's main contribution to ram has been in the form of plagarized URL informations. Keith continues to demonstrate a heck of lot better grasp of reality than ol' "Splaps Boy the Tarvernaut" has ever shown us. Let's see, if we consider the specific claims from the above Of course, poor Kevin, fails to understand that Phil has no clue. If either of them did, they would not need to revert to being archive trolls to get the job done. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message .. . "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message .. . "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Chad Irby" wrote in message ... In article , (B2431) wrote: From: (robert arndt) Are YOU a physicist now Keith? No, you aren't... just some guy who likes to act like one. Rob OK, arndt, now you have tarver on your side. He's a EE with jet mech experience a long time ago yet claims to be an expert on everything. Geez, Tarver and Arndt working together. I don't want Robert to feel bad about Willshaw's unqualified abuse. Certainly, if a bomb with a 5 year half life, producing a highly radioactive element, could be made, it would have effected Effected? As in made it occur? No, there would be no way to go forward with operations, without a lot of equipment the USAF did not have, as there was only preperation for the area cooling off in ten days. Effected? You need to leave the sentences in one piece to be able to follow, Kevin. It is clear that you are none too bright and bifrocating a complete thought is something your mind is probably incapable of doing the registering for. Yo, genius...since you are proving to be as dense as usual, I'll give you a hint: "affected" was the word you were really looking for. the USAF operational plan to repopulate flight lines after ten days. Where did you get this, from the same source you got your "optical nuke" from? Same place. That figures--so you mean you made it up? I mean I was in ADC in the 1970s and then signatory to ITT's Paramus account on Edwards in the 1980s. So you did make it up. What did you do during the Cold War, Kevin? Sat around waiting to install my share of the V Corps obstacle effort, which was already pretty tightly mapped out for us. Grunts did not need to know much. Yeah, nothing more than the OPLAN which we were gonna be supporting, right? Geeze, you are proving to be especially ridiculous today, Tarvernaut. I held an NSA Secret ticket at 17. Uhmmm...what is a "NSA Secret" clearance? Similar to a "DoD Secret" clearance and it's inferior cousin the "DSO Secret" clearance. Each of the agencies uses a different level of effort in their work. Eh? Got anything to back that one up? That seems to differ with info from the DSS (security clearances are normally respected across the span of government agencies). Why do you presist in making things up that you *never* provide evidence in support of? Are you so out of touch with reality that you actually think others *believe* this kind of horsecrap? I have heard of Confidential, and Secret, and NATO-Secret, and Top Secret with all of its strange subcategories, but never an "NSA Secret". It is hardly surprising that you are ignorant of clearances, Kevin. LOL! Yeah, sure thing there, Splapsy. You get back to us when you come up with some evidence to support these latest curious rants of yours, you hear now? Until then we'll file them with your fictional "optical nuke", etc. Brooks |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message t... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "robert arndt" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... Are YOU a physicist now Keith? No Robert, Willshaw is a "kook troll" claiming engineering experiance in the nuclear industry, while demonstrating no understanding of the processes, or elements involved. Willshaw's main contribution to ram has been in the form of plagarized URL informations. Keith continues to demonstrate a heck of lot better grasp of reality than ol' "Splaps Boy the Tarvernaut" has ever shown us. Let's see, if we consider the specific claims from the above Of course, poor Kevin, fails to understand that Phil has no clue. If either of them did, they would not need to revert to being archive trolls to get the job done. Phil? What "Phil" are you talking about? Are you paranoid much? Brooks |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message . .. "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message t... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "robert arndt" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... Are YOU a physicist now Keith? No Robert, Willshaw is a "kook troll" claiming engineering experiance in the nuclear industry, while demonstrating no understanding of the processes, or elements involved. Willshaw's main contribution to ram has been in the form of plagarized URL informations. Keith continues to demonstrate a heck of lot better grasp of reality than ol' "Splaps Boy the Tarvernaut" has ever shown us. Let's see, if we consider the specific claims from the above Of course, poor Kevin, fails to understand that Phil has no clue. If either of them did, they would not need to revert to being archive trolls to get the job done. Phil? What "Phil" are you talking about? Are you paranoid much? It is Phil Miller's archive troll you posted, Brooks. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message . .. "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... snip Yo, genius...since you are proving to be as dense as usual, I'll give you a hint: "affected" was the word you were really looking for. I got that a while back, Kevin. Why are you here, Kevin, outside your hemroid like personality banishing you to discussion groups? I do not believe you are a net contributer to ram and that makes you a lower form of troll than even Willshaw. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message . .. "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message t... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "robert arndt" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... Are YOU a physicist now Keith? No Robert, Willshaw is a "kook troll" claiming engineering experiance in the nuclear industry, while demonstrating no understanding of the processes, or elements involved. Willshaw's main contribution to ram has been in the form of plagarized URL informations. Keith continues to demonstrate a heck of lot better grasp of reality than ol' "Splaps Boy the Tarvernaut" has ever shown us. Let's see, if we consider the specific claims from the above Of course, poor Kevin, fails to understand that Phil has no clue. If either of them did, they would not need to revert to being archive trolls to get the job done. Phil? What "Phil" are you talking about? Are you paranoid much? It is Phil Miller's archive troll you posted, Brooks. Oh, *that* Phil. You must have mistakenly snipped that entertaining link, so here it is again... http://members.optusnet.com.au/~phil...FAQ_tarver.htm I especially liked the ones where you were honking about all of that allegedly high-level political muscle you have there...a real hoot! Brooks |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message . .. "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message . .. "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message t... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "robert arndt" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... Are YOU a physicist now Keith? No Robert, Willshaw is a "kook troll" claiming engineering experiance in the nuclear industry, while demonstrating no understanding of the processes, or elements involved. Willshaw's main contribution to ram has been in the form of plagarized URL informations. Keith continues to demonstrate a heck of lot better grasp of reality than ol' "Splaps Boy the Tarvernaut" has ever shown us. Let's see, if we consider the specific claims from the above Of course, poor Kevin, fails to understand that Phil has no clue. If either of them did, they would not need to revert to being archive trolls to get the job done. Phil? What "Phil" are you talking about? Are you paranoid much? It is Phil Miller's archive troll you posted, Brooks. Oh, *that* Phil. Yep, clueless Phil. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AIRCRAFT MUNITIONS - THE COBALT BOMB | Garrison Hilliard | Military Aviation | 1 | August 29th 03 09:22 AM |