Kennedy gets his own TFR

Tina writes:

I don't remember, but was anyone in this newsgroup upset that Senator
John Glenn got to ride in one of the shuttles for some 'scientific'
reason after he left the senate? It was, of course, made up science.

I thought his trip was useful because it made it clear that age isn't the
obstacle that many believe it to be.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Tina writes:

I don't remember, but was anyone in this newsgroup upset that Senator
John Glenn got to ride in one of the shuttles for some 'scientific'
reason after he left the senate? It was, of course, made up science.

I thought his trip was useful because it made it clear that age isn't the
obstacle that many believe it to be.


Wo! just think! you'll be able to not fly airpalnes well into your
nineties!



Bertie

Glenn's trip was a "Thank you" from NASA. It was junk science, nothing
seems to have appeared in the professional literature.

Who cares about the cost, it's other people's money.

It made NOTHING clear. scientifically except a useless agency knows
where its funding comes from.




On May 27, 3:36 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Tina writes:
I don't remember, but was anyone in this newsgroup upset that Senator
John Glenn got to ride in one of the shuttles for some 'scientific'
reason after he left the senate? It was, of course, made up science.

I thought his trip was useful because it made it clear that age isn't the
obstacle that many believe it to be.

Soupy Sales was a seniour
Tina wrote on 5/26/2008 :
As I wrote before, I don't like this man, but this kind of perq is
pretty minor for someone with his influence. It may be one of the last
times he *SALES* this course.

On Tue, 27 May 2008 14:43:24 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote:

Stealth Pilot wrote in
:

On Tue, 27 May 2008 12:35:21 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote:

gregvk wrote in
. 0.1:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in news:g1cpcj$41u$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

On 25 May 2008, you wrote in rec.aviation.piloting:

Dudley Henriques schrieb:
No offense meant Jim ; just an observation from years and years
of
Usenet experience :-))). I'm sure you know what I mean.

In all those years: have you never trimmed your posts? you've been
told a couple of times by now from different people. Please: TRIM
YOUR POSTS!




Or what, ze Russian Front?



Bertie

You are hereby ordered, under penalties too shocking to be described
in public, to trim your posts. This is your final warning.

aside Goddamn bunyips. /aside


But by not trimming my poasts I get people to squeal!


Bertie

Bertie what is a poast?
I asked the sooth effrikun expats at work today which african country
used 'poast' as the word for post.
they shook heads and said none of them.

you talk about trimming your poasts. what is a poast?
(or do you have fat fingers on the s key?

Stealth Pilot


You need to go chekc out some of the trolllz froups. Mis-spelling is a
common technique used to hook fjukkwits like Maxwell. they're keen to
jump in and shriek about the poaster's pudgy fingers and what not. The
mis-spellings are a convention in themselves to some degree. Poast is
usualy (mis) spelled that way as is froup, lits (list) and a number of
others . Makes it an "in" joke as well.

And why the **** would you ask a Yarpie anything unless it's how to arm
your BMW X5 to the teeth?




Bertie




Bertie

it is an australian tradition that we talk kindly to our bunyips :-)

btw in this post trimming serious business have you noticed that I'm
really on to the guys request. :-)
next he'll be asking that we dont hit 'post to all newsgroups' :-)
Stealth Pilot

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...

How#'s that? Can you be absolutely sure beyond any shadow of doubt that he
isn't the second coming?


Bertie

What a dumb ass.

"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...

One thing about these political exchanges on Usenet is that they are never
rectified.

No, just not to YOUR satisfaction.

"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...

What I usually try to do is pass on these political things to begin with.

Then why didn't you?

"Jim Logajan" wrote in message
.. .

I'm sorry, but this isn't an issue involving only a "right to personal
protection." He could secure that right ON HIS OWN if he were willing to
make HIS OWN SACRIFICE TO SECURE IT. This is an issue where THE RIGHTS OF
OTHERS TO ENJOY THE PUBLIC AIRSPACE ARE SACRIFICED so that HE DOESN'T HAVE
TO MAKE ANY SACRIFICES.

Exactly the point.

"Martin Hotze" wrote in message
...
Dudley Henriques schrieb:
No offense meant Jim ; just an observation from years and years of Usenet
experience :-))). I'm sure you know what I mean.

In all those years: have you never trimmed your posts? you've been told a
couple of times by now from different people. Please: TRIM YOUR POSTS!

#m

f-up2poster

Oh hell no, he's Dudley the magnificent.

Read about him on Wikipeidia, if they haven't thrown him off yet.