If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Rapoport wrote:
"Mike" wrote in message ... On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 01:21:11 -0600, "Scott Jensen" wrote: There is usually a point where it is cheaper to do it yourself than have someone else do it for you. What I'm wondering is what would that point be when it comes to trans-world air travel. When does buying your own jet and employing your own pilots make economic sense than using an airline? Or will the airlines always be cheaper? More specifically, let's say you have a number of employees in Fiji. Each gets four round-trip flights to anywhere in the world each year as part of their benefit package. Most will want to use at least one of those for the Christmas season to spend the holidays with family. There would also be an expected heavier usage of their flight options during the summer. The question I have is: How many employees would one need to have where buying a private jet and employing pilots would make economic sense? Would there also be a span between these two options where chartering a private jet would make economic sense? Scott Jensen I am pretty sure that private jet ownership will lose in a pure cost comparison. However, to make a fair comparison, one would have to consider many factors. What is the passenger's time worth? Is there convenient regular scheduled service? etc. A round trip first class ticket from the US to Europe can be upwards of $10,000 if purchased at the last minute. Or you could buy your own Boeing Business Jet for $40,000,000. Even if only used for one trip, the BBJ could have a net lower cost. If the passenger takes the commercial flight for $10,000 and the airline gets him there late and he loses the $4 billion dollar deal, then you can see why he would be better off spending the money for the BBJ. How would the BBJ have a lower cost? With BBJ: $4,000,000,000 income from deal -40,000,000 cost of BBJ -------------------------------- $3,960,000,000 net income to company Without BBJ: $ 0 income from deal -10,000 cost of airline ticket ------------------------------------- $ -10,000 net income (loss) to company Net cost to company of not owning BBJ: $3,960,010,000 These numbers aren't typical, but then again these days they're not unreasonable. Rich Lemert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Owning vs. charter vs. airlines | Scott Jensen | Owning | 49 | April 6th 05 12:03 PM |
Virtual Airline sues Real Airline | Joseph Brown | Simulators | 4 | April 25th 04 09:10 PM |
Why don't airlines also do charter jets? | Scott T. Jensen | General Aviation | 18 | January 6th 04 07:24 PM |
CHARTER: rec.aviation.piloting | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 47 | January 2nd 04 10:19 PM |
Continental Airlines Complaint - A Newspaper article | John B. | Piloting | 40 | October 21st 03 04:07 PM |