A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

V-22: Combat, With Limits, Looms for Hybrid Aircraft



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 14th 07, 01:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,us.military.army,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Mike[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default V-22: Combat, With Limits, Looms for Hybrid Aircraft

video at http://video.on.nytimes.com/index.js...59466 77e9492

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/14/bu...=1&oref=slogin

April 14, 2007
Combat, With Limits, Looms for Hybrid Aircraft
By LESLIE WAYNE
The Marine Corps said yesterday that the V-22 Osprey, a hybrid
aircraft with a troubled past, will be sent to Iraq this September,
where it will see combat for the first time.

But because of a checkered safety record in test flights, the V-22
will be kept on a short leash.

The Pentagon has placed so many restrictions on how it can be used in
combat that the plane - which is able to drop troops into battle like
a helicopter and then speed away from danger like an airplane - could
have difficulty fulfilling the Marines' longstanding mission for it.

In Iraq, the V-22 will begin to replace the Vietnam-era helicopters
that are increasingly facing enemy fire. The limitations on the V-22,
which cost $80 million apiece, mean it cannot evade enemy fire with
the same maneuvers and sharp turns used by helicopter pilots.

As a result, the craft could be more vulnerable to attack, and may
result in the Marines keeping it out of the thick of battle, using it
instead for less dangerous tasks.

"They will plan their missions in Iraq to avoid it getting into areas
where there are serious threats," said Thomas Christie, the Pentagon's
director of operations, test and evaluation from 2001 to 2005, who is
now retired. The V-22's debut in combatends a remarkable 25-year
struggle for the Marines to build a craft they could call their own.

In announcing the Iraq deployment yesterday, Gen. James T. Conway, the
Marine Corps' commandant, referred to those efforts as "a road marked
by some setbacks, lots of sacrifices and the success of these Marines
standing before you."

The V-22 has been the Marines' top priority - the Pentagon has spent
$20 billion so far and has budgeted $54.6 billion for it. The money
has bought a craft that is half-helicopter, half-airplane and whose
speed, say the Marines, will save lives.

But the V-22 has also suffered some of the deadliest test crashes in
Marine history. It has claimed 30 lives, 26 of them marines, in three
test flight crashes. A fourth V-22 crashed, but there were no deaths
then. Many more have been damaged in lesser incidents involving fires,
stalled engines and software glitches.

Critics say the V-22's unusual design can create deadly problems that
the Marines have minimized in their single-minded pursuit of the
craft.

"It's like a bad poker hand, and the Marines have been investing in it
for 20 years," said Philip Coyle, the Pentagon's top weapons tester
from 1994 to 2001. "They might have been better if they invested in
brand new helicopters."

The plane's most widely cited design problem is that one of its
propellers can get caught in its own turbulence as it comes in for a
landing, and that can cause the V-22 to roll over and head into the
ground.

For that reason, V-22 pilots are trained to steer clear of their own
turbulence by rules prohibiting them from making the quick maneuvers
used by helicopters to evade enemy fire. Instead, the V-22 must land
at speeds as slow as nine miles an hour and in a fairly straight
line.

A 2005 Pentagon report said these limitations "may prove insufficient"
in protecting the V-22 from ground fire. As a result, that Pentagon
evaluation said the V-22 was suited only for low- and medium-threat
environments, and is not "operationally effective" in high-threat
environments.

Some critics say that in the heat of battle, V-22 pilots could forget
these restrictions and move in ways that could bring the craft down.

"The V-22 cannot do radical evasive maneuvers" said Lee Gaillard,
author of a report critical of the V-22, "Wonder Weapon or Widow
Maker" for the Center for Defense Information, which studies weapons
programs. "But that's what it will need for combat."

The Marines defend the V-22 by saying it provides a margin of safety a
helicopter cannot because it can fly faster, farther and higher.

They say it can get to wounded troops quicker and speed them to
medical care in what is called the "golden hour" when life can hang in
the balance. Because the V-22 flies with a lower "acoustical
signature," it can enter a battlefield less noisily than a
helicopter.

Officials add that the Osprey can do more evasive maneuvers than
currently permitted - and further testing will prove that.

"If flies twice as fast as the CH-46 that it is replacing," said Lt.
Gen. John Castellaw, head of the Marine aviation program. "It carries
three times the payload; it goes five times as far; it's six times as
survivable. So what you're deploying is an asset that increases the
combat capability of the Marines."

"That's what you want to do," added General Castellaw. "Give them the
best you can."

Col. Mathew Mulhern, the Pentagon's V-22 program officer, whose
Patuxent River office has an "Osprey Country" sign, says marines
cannot wait to get on board.

"Every marine who sees one, when they do, a light bulb comes on," said
Colonel Mulhern. "They say, 'my God.' "

Each V-22 costs about three times the price of a modern helicopter and
nearly the same as a fighter jet. The Marines will get 360 Ospreys,
Air Force Special Forces will get 50 and there will be 48 for the
Navy.

The program's high cost and uncertain technology led Vice President
Dick Cheney, when he was secretary of defense under President George
H. W. Bush, to try four times to cancel the program.

But, from 1989 to 1992, Mr. Cheney was beaten back by Congress. Work
on the project - the Boeing Company and Bell Helicopter Textron are
the main contractors - is spread across 40 states and 2,000
subcontractors, giving the V-22 broad support. More than 100 members
of Congress even formed a Tiltrotor Technology Coalition to protect
it.

"We have proven conclusively that this is an extraordinarily fine
craft," said Robert Leder, a spokesman for the Bell-Boeing V-22
program. "It is a very safe craft and will be of tremendous service.
''

All new weapons have problems in testing. But critics say the V-22 is
plagued with basic design problems.

Should the V-22 lose power, it can not "autorotate" like a helicopter
and allow the updraft of air to rotate its propellers for a hard, but
survivable, landing. Because of this, according to the 2005 Pentagon
report, emergency V-22 landings without power at altitudes below 1,600
feet "are not likely to be survivable."

"If you lose power on a V-22, you just burn and crash," said one
Pentagon official involved in testing the craft but who was not
authorized to speak publicly. "There is no way to survive. "

The cabin is not pressurized, even though the craft can fly at
altitudes of 10,000 feet and above, where breathing is difficult and
it is not climate-controlled.

Pentagon reports also say the V-22 is too cramped for the 24 marines
it can carry. The marines are so packed into the windowless cabin that
they can become airsick, their legs can grow numb and leaving the
plane quickly is difficult.

There is no bathroom on board and marines have criticized the "piddle
packs" they are to use as insufficient. And, there is no place on
board to store them once they are full.

V-22 downdraft is so strong, and moves in so many directions that it
can create "brownout" conditions, making it difficult for pilots to
see and potentially knocking down marines on the ground.

As a result, when rope ladders are used, the V-22 must hover at higher
altitudes, making marines more vulnerable to fire.

"Safety is a big issue," wrote one V-22 crew chief, in a questionnaire
filled out for the Pentagon's 2005 operational evaluation. "If we had
went down in the water we would have most likely lost at least 24
troops because of restricted egress. I felt like I was in a coffin."

These are more than theoretical concerns. On April 8, 2000, 19 marines
were killed in a training exercise when a V-22 descended too fast and
crashed near Tucson. It was the third V-22 to crash - seven people
were killed in two previous crashes.

In December 2000, four more marines, including the program's most
experienced pilot, were killed in a crash caused by a burst hydraulic
line and software problems.

These accidents led to program delays to make design changes. But as
tests resumed, so have the problems.

Three engine fires occurred recently because of problems related to
hydraulic lines. In March 2006, a computer problem led an idling V-22
to suddenly take off on its own. It then slammed into the ground,
breaking off its right wing. All 54 V-22's were grounded for weeks in
February because of a faulty computer chip.

In preparation for deployment, the Pentagon ran tests last year in the
New Mexico desert, similar to the climate of Iraq. In January, the
Pentagon wrote about frequent failures with various parts and systems.
The reason: "Extended exposure to the desert operating environment."

Because of these problems, Mr. Coyle, the former Pentagon weapons
tester, predicted the Marines will use the V-22 to ferry troops from
one relatively safe spot to another, like a flying truck.

"They don't want to have a 'Black Hawk down,' " he said. "That would
kill the program. Of course, it was not designed to be a truck. It was
designed to be used in combat."

The Marines say the V-22 will prove the critics wrong.

"Ask all the naysayers how many hours they have flown," said Colonel
Mulhern, the V-22 program manger.

"They are just sitting around a desk and crunching numbers," he added.
"Go talk to the Marines. The V-22 has come of age. The first marine it
saves makes it worth what we paid for it. And I have real confidence
that the V-22 will do it."

Fans include General Castellaw, a Vietnam helicopter pilot, who has
flown the V-22.

"I came in at a high altitude and then did a tactical ingress," said
General Castellaw. "Yankin' and bankin' to avoid simulated fire, came
in low, streaked into the zone. The aircraft is nimble, agile. You can
yank and bank with the best of them.

"I believe absolutely that this is the most survivable craft for the
Marine Corps' most precious assets," he added. " If I did not believe
that, I would not deploy it. I have absolute faith in the craft to do
the mission."

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wind limits - small single engine aircraft [email protected] Piloting 30 February 7th 07 08:36 AM
Current fighter aircraft in combat?? zalzon Military Aviation 1 August 11th 04 11:07 PM
Current fighter aircraft in combat?? zalzon Naval Aviation 0 August 11th 04 10:23 PM
Anti-Ice on Combat Aircraft Charles Talleyrand Military Aviation 21 December 18th 03 07:34 AM
Which post-WW2 combat aircraft have not been used in combat? Kirk Stant Military Aviation 96 December 10th 03 04:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.