|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
September 15th 18, 04:54 PM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
Vario Comparison
On Saturday, 15 September 2018 09:43:19 UTC-4, wrote:
On Friday, 14 September 2018 21:37:03 UTC-4, Charlie Quebec wrote: The difference is the slow response of the mechanical ASI damps the transients, whereas an electronic device can respond fast enough to track them. OK, understood, thank you. This generates a new question from me (sorry if this is turning out to be a lesson in instrumentation design...): Can you slow down the response of your electronic system so that it behaves similarly to your mechanical ASI, or does this bring on poorer performance elsewhere? Please disregard my previous comments and questions. I just read Mike Borgelt's 'Horizontal Gusts' article and this article gives answers to my questions. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Aircraft comparison | Jkgoblue | Owning | 1 | November 23rd 05 10:18 PM |
| Vario Comparison Update | Paul Remde | Soaring | 4 | January 9th 05 08:51 PM |
| F-22 Comparison | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 39 | December 4th 03 04:25 PM |
| Comparison of IFR simulators | Chris Kurz | Simulators | 0 | October 27th 03 10:35 AM |
| EMW A6 Comparison to X-15 | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 8 | October 2nd 03 02:26 AM |
Hybrid Mode
