|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
May 25th 04, 04:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
ILS or LOC Approach
It seems that recently approach charts have appeared labeled "ILS or LOC" --
examples are at HAO and RMN. Is this a change? Why? In the past ILS approaches with an underlying LOC would still be titled "ILS". -------------------- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com 
|
|
#2
May 25th 04, 10:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Kaplan wrote: It seems that recently approach charts have appeared labeled "ILS or LOC" -- examples are at HAO and RMN. Is this a change? Why? In the past ILS approaches with an underlying LOC would still be titled "ILS". TERPs naming conventions were changed about three years ago. It takes a long time for this stuff to factor into the system.
|
|
#3
May 26th 04, 02:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Richard Kaplan" wrote in
s.com: It seems that recently approach charts have appeared labeled "ILS or LOC" -- examples are at HAO and RMN. Is this a change? Why? In the past ILS approaches with an underlying LOC would still be titled "ILS". -------------------- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com I was flying the ILS/LOC at HAO the other day and was wondering about the same thing. Could the fact that the LOC approach has a step down fix past the FAF have something to do with this?
|
|
#4
May 26th 04, 05:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Andrew Sarangan wrote: I was flying the ILS/LOC at HAO the other day and was wondering about the same thing. Could the fact that the LOC approach has a step down fix past the FAF have something to do with this? Don't wonder. The TERPs naming convention was changed about three years ago for any number of reasons. You can try to read your view-in-a-vacuum until you're blue in the face. What difference does it make in normal operations anyway?
|
|
#5
May 26th 04, 05:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
read your view-in-a-vacuum
Can you translate this phrase? Sounds like something I'd like to use, but I want to know what I'm saying. ;-)
|
|
#6
May 26th 04, 07:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Greg Esres wrote: read your view-in-a-vacuum Can you translate this phrase? Sounds like something I'd like to use, but I want to know what I'm saying. ;-) Speculation without checking the appropriate sources to hopefully determine whether the chart name is kosher or some fed had a wild hair somewhere.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | May 6th 04 04:19 AM |
| Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 11:13 AM |
| Why an NDB approach with a miss to an intersection? | Ben Jackson | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | March 25th 04 03:53 AM |
| Changes to Aircraft Approach Categories?! | skyliner | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 9th 04 08:55 PM |
| IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |
Linear Mode
