If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Autopilot use during approach
Ron Natalie wrote:
Ray Andraka wrote: If your POH supplement for the autopilot has operating limitations, it isn't legal to use contrary to those limitations. Mine doesn't allow use of the autopilot with the landing lights on, for example. You won't find these anywhere in the AIM or FARs, but they are just as binding as one of the regulations. But it is one of the regulations...91.9 causes anything that's in the flight manual limitations to have the force of regulation. I've pointed this out to McMuffin before but he refuses to learn. Right, I meant that he wouldn't find the specific restriction for his airplane in the FARs. All that is there is 91.9 that, as you point out basically says that you cant operate contrary to your POH. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Autopilot use during approach
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:05:49 -0400, Ron Natalie
wrote: Ray Andraka wrote: If your POH supplement for the autopilot has operating limitations, it My POH for the Deb and an auxiliary section for the SP. It doesn't state any limitation for the S-Tec 50. Howeve the 50 is only capalble of flying either a heading (DG coupled) or the localizer. It can only hold altitude so any profile use is out. So it amounts to the thing only being able to hold a course and/or alitude and those are its built in limitations. It does work very well on step down approaches as long as the pilot remembes the proper power settings. BTW it really it's more than a wing leveler as can do standard rate turns as well. At last I'd call it more than a wing leveler. isn't legal to use contrary to those limitations. Mine doesn't allow use of the autopilot with the landing lights on, for example. You won't find these anywhere in the AIM or FARs, but they are just as binding as one of the regulations. But it is one of the regulations...91.9 causes anything that's in the flight manual limitations to have the force of regulation. I've pointed this out to McMuffin before but he refuses to learn. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Autopilot | [email protected] | Piloting | 40 | January 5th 06 09:12 PM |
KAP 140 autopilot approach | Yossarian | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | October 12th 05 03:10 PM |
IMC without an autopilot | Jon Kraus | Instrument Flight Rules | 101 | April 18th 04 07:17 PM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |
Autopilot | Hankal | Owning | 1 | November 10th 03 02:21 AM |