Harvey Field Endangered

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 08:26:45 -0700, wrote in
.com:

The airport actually does flood.

Harvey Field isn't the only one. Corona Municipal Airport (KAJO)
floods also:


http://www.pe.com/localnews/corona/s...5.3c2b7a4.html
Last year's storm marked the seventh time the airport has flooded
in the past 37 years.

https://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/leadnews/189251-1.html
http://www.rapp.org/archives/2005/02/flood_photos

So does Pacific City (Oregon) when an exceptional high tide appears.

--
"Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool."
—- Voltaire

Tri-Pacer wrote:
. We are indeed
stopped from making a reasonable sized runway, and have to treat every
landing as a short field landing. We're planning to do what we can to
fight this,

Has the runway been shortened recently? Why the reference to a short field
landing?

I haven't stopped at Harvey recently and thought it was still 2700 feet. I
don't have a current chart or AFD handy to check myself.

Cheers:

Paul
N1431A
KPLU



I agree, my private strip is 1330 feet and I don't have any problem with
my Pacer, but some low-land folks need 3500' cuz they cross the numbers
at 1000' on routine landings.

--
"Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool."
—- Voltaire