If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Water Injection Question
A couple of days ago, I saw a picture of a DC-8, i think, taking off,
trailing thick black smoke from the engines (they weren't on fire). The description of the picture said that it was using water injection to give more power for takeoff. I also came across this when reading about the P-47. How does that system work? I presume it's different for pistons and jets. Triple Delta |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"DeltaDeltaDelta" wrote in message ... A couple of days ago, I saw a picture of a DC-8, i think, taking off, trailing thick black smoke from the engines (they weren't on fire). The description of the picture said that it was using water injection to give more power for takeoff. I also came across this when reading about the P-47. How does that system work? I presume it's different for pistons and jets. Triple Delta Doesn't this have something to do with methanol fuels and water? Supposedly water increases HP in methanol. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
DeltaDeltaDelta wrote:
A couple of days ago, I saw a picture of a DC-8, i think, taking off, trailing thick black smoke from the engines (they weren't on fire). The description of the picture said that it was using water injection to give more power for takeoff. I also came across this when reading about the P-47. How does that system work? I presume it's different for pistons and jets. Triple Delta Triple, I am not sure about the jet physics. In the piston (large radial) world, a water/alcohol mix is injected just downstream of the carburettor for hight power operation. This has the effect of reducing combustion chamber temperatures, thus allowing higher manifold pressures (i.e. HP) without detonation. If you didn't inject water at these power settings, the amount of excess fuel needed to keep the temps down would actually flood the mixture, causing power loss. The alcohol in the mix does virtually nothing to contribute to the power output, it is there merely to keep the water fromm freezing at altitude. Interestingly, Pratt & Whitney apparently stumbled upon this effect while doing heavy rain water injestion tests in the early days. Happy Flying! Scott Skylane |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Skylane wrote:
Interestingly, Pratt & Whitney apparently stumbled upon this effect while doing heavy rain water *injestion* tests in the early days. Happy Flying! Scott Skylane Woops! Make that *ingestion* |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hmm...interesting. I always wondered about that MW50 (nethanol-water)
mixture used on some Luftwaffe WW2 fighters (most notably on the FW-190 and derivatives)...Thanks for the info Triple Delta "Scott Skylane" wrote in message ... Scott Skylane wrote: Interestingly, Pratt & Whitney apparently stumbled upon this effect while doing heavy rain water *injestion* tests in the early days. Happy Flying! Scott Skylane Woops! Make that *ingestion* |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Water injection cools the air both before and after combustion. The lower
temperatures allow more fuel to be burned (turbine) or allow more MP or compression to be used without detonation (piston). Mike MU-2 "DeltaDeltaDelta" wrote in message ... A couple of days ago, I saw a picture of a DC-8, i think, taking off, trailing thick black smoke from the engines (they weren't on fire). The description of the picture said that it was using water injection to give more power for takeoff. I also came across this when reading about the P-47. How does that system work? I presume it's different for pistons and jets. Triple Delta |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"DeltaDeltaDelta" wrote in message ... A couple of days ago, I saw a picture of a DC-8, i think, taking off, trailing thick black smoke from the engines (they weren't on fire). The description of the picture said that it was using water injection to give more power for takeoff. I also came across this when reading about the P-47. How does that system work? I presume it's different for pistons and jets. Triple Delta 3D.....See Rapoports answer for the technical explanation. Aircraft such as the B-52 models prior to the G and the KC-135A used water injection takeoff thrust if the weight and weather demanded it. It was a tremendous boost in thrust in the B-52G and when the water ran out, a big deacceleration. As you noticed, water injected takeoffs caused a lot of smoke. JB |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim Baker" wrote in message ... "DeltaDeltaDelta" wrote in message ... A couple of days ago, I saw a picture of a DC-8, i think, taking off, trailing thick black smoke from the engines (they weren't on fire). The description of the picture said that it was using water injection to give more power for takeoff. I also came across this when reading about the P-47. How does that system work? I presume it's different for pistons and jets. Triple Delta 3D.....See Rapoports answer for the technical explanation. Aircraft such as the B-52 models prior to the G and the KC-135A used water injection takeoff thrust if the weight and weather demanded it. It was a tremendous boost in thrust in the B-52G and when the water ran out, a big deacceleration. As you noticed, water injected takeoffs caused a lot of smoke. JB Should be "...Aircraft such as...prior to the H and the..." JB |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Water on the big round engines is called ADI. (Anti Detonation
Injection. It lowers the combustion temperature and accomplishes exactly that. A jet engine produces thrust by the amount of mass it can push out the back end. By injecting water you have increased that mass and the thrust increases without a cooresponding increase in internal temperature. More fuel can be added also for the same internal temperature withour the water. The alcohol in the water is there to keep it from freezing and plain water would accomplish the same thing as far as performance. Water was/is only used on the older low bypass engines because their low speed thrust is low and the metals used can't stand the temperatures of modern engines. Modern engines have much better low-speed thrust because of the high bypass fan and the ability to run at a much higher temperature because of the metalurgy. On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:42:42 -0700, "Jim Baker" wrote: "DeltaDeltaDelta" wrote in message ... A couple of days ago, I saw a picture of a DC-8, i think, taking off, trailing thick black smoke from the engines (they weren't on fire). The description of the picture said that it was using water injection to give more power for takeoff. I also came across this when reading about the P-47. How does that system work? I presume it's different for pistons and jets. Triple Delta 3D.....See Rapoports answer for the technical explanation. Aircraft such as the B-52 models prior to the G and the KC-135A used water injection takeoff thrust if the weight and weather demanded it. It was a tremendous boost in thrust in the B-52G and when the water ran out, a big deacceleration. As you noticed, water injected takeoffs caused a lot of smoke. JB |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Geez Scott,
I've got 5 textbooks that cover water injection and they dont even come close to explainin git as well as you did..way to go "Scott Skylane" wrote in message ... DeltaDeltaDelta wrote: A couple of days ago, I saw a picture of a DC-8, i think, taking off, trailing thick black smoke from the engines (they weren't on fire). The description of the picture said that it was using water injection to give more power for takeoff. I also came across this when reading about the P-47. How does that system work? I presume it's different for pistons and jets. Triple Delta Triple, I am not sure about the jet physics. In the piston (large radial) world, a water/alcohol mix is injected just downstream of the carburettor for hight power operation. This has the effect of reducing combustion chamber temperatures, thus allowing higher manifold pressures (i.e. HP) without detonation. If you didn't inject water at these power settings, the amount of excess fuel needed to keep the temps down would actually flood the mixture, causing power loss. The alcohol in the mix does virtually nothing to contribute to the power output, it is there merely to keep the water fromm freezing at altitude. Interestingly, Pratt & Whitney apparently stumbled upon this effect while doing heavy rain water injestion tests in the early days. Happy Flying! Scott Skylane |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Induction System Water Problem | Mike Spera | Owning | 1 | January 30th 05 05:29 AM |
Questions regarding Air/Oil Separators | Doodybutch | Owning | 6 | April 20th 04 05:56 PM |
Water Cooled Jet Engines: a possibillity then and now? | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 3 | December 18th 03 09:41 AM |
C-17s as water bombers | Ross Oliver | Piloting | 11 | November 12th 03 02:22 AM |
Question ~ Does fuel injection add weight? | Barnyard BOb -- | Home Built | 0 | July 6th 03 09:47 PM |