A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Contact Approach



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 14th 05, 04:53 AM
Russ MacDonald
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Contact Approach

Being from Texas, and flying mostly in the Midwest and South, I have never
asked for nor had any need for a contact approach. If I see the runway I
tell the controller, and he gives me a visual. In fact, I can't remember
ever hearing a contact approach requested around here.

Then, I whenever I fly into the Northeast and I hear contact approaches
being requested regularly. Why is the contact approach used so much in the
Northeast?


  #2  
Old February 14th 05, 01:01 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 04:53:59 GMT, "Russ MacDonald"
wrote:

Being from Texas, and flying mostly in the Midwest and South, I have never
asked for nor had any need for a contact approach. If I see the runway I
tell the controller, and he gives me a visual. In fact, I can't remember
ever hearing a contact approach requested around here.

Then, I whenever I fly into the Northeast and I hear contact approaches
being requested regularly. Why is the contact approach used so much in the
Northeast?



We're smarter than Texas pilots?
  #3  
Old February 14th 05, 01:11 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Russ MacDonald" wrote in message
news:H9WPd.18600$uc.8876@trnddc05...

Being from Texas, and flying mostly in the Midwest and South, I have never
asked for nor had any need for a contact approach. If I see the runway I
tell the controller, and he gives me a visual.


That's not sufficient, a visual approach requires VFR conditions.


  #4  
Old February 19th 05, 03:15 AM
Russ MacDonald
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Being from Texas, and flying mostly in the Midwest and South, I have
never
asked for nor had any need for a contact approach. If I see the runway I
tell the controller, and he gives me a visual.


That's not sufficient, a visual approach requires VFR conditions.


Well, if it is an uncontrolled airport, the airspace is Class G from 700
feet to the surface, and all you need is 1 mile and clear of clouds for VFR,
right?

Another angle; in class G you can fly IFR without a clearance (as long as
you have an instrument rating). We always cancel IFR as soon as we see the
field and can make it in clear of clouds.

Russ


  #5  
Old February 19th 05, 04:05 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Russ MacDonald" wrote in message
news:8byRd.32494$wc.19438@trnddc07...

Well, if it is an uncontrolled airport, the airspace is Class G from 700
feet to the surface, and all you need is 1 mile and clear of clouds for
VFR, right?


Not necessarily. Uncontrolled fields can have controlled airspace beginning
at the surface, at 700' or 1200' above the surface or even higher.



Another angle; in class G you can fly IFR without a clearance (as long as
you have an instrument rating).


In Class G airspace you can fly IFR without a clearance but you need
sufficient room to do so. In areas where the floor of Class E airspace is
1200' AGL or lower there's no room to do so.



We always cancel IFR as soon as we see the field and can make it in clear
of clouds.


Clear of clouds may not be good enough. Assuming you haven't been cleared
for an approach, the moment you cancel you're in controlled airspace without
an IFR clearance so VFR cloud clearance requirements will apply.


  #6  
Old February 19th 05, 05:46 AM
Stan Gosnell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Russ MacDonald" wrote in
news:8byRd.32494$wc.19438@trnddc07:

Well, if it is an uncontrolled airport, the airspace is Class G from
700 feet to the surface, and all you need is 1 mile and clear of
clouds for VFR, right?


Not necessarily. Many uncontrolled fields have a Class E surface area,
where the Class E airspace goes all the way to the ground. You need
1000/3 there.

--
Regards,

Stan

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." B. Franklin
  #7  
Old February 19th 05, 04:22 PM
Russ MacDonald
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Stan Gosnell" wrote in message
...
"Russ MacDonald" wrote in
news:8byRd.32494$wc.19438@trnddc07:

Well, if it is an uncontrolled airport, the airspace is Class G from
700 feet to the surface, and all you need is 1 mile and clear of
clouds for VFR, right?


Not necessarily. Many uncontrolled fields have a Class E surface area,
where the Class E airspace goes all the way to the ground. You need
1000/3 there.


An UNCONTROLLED field with E airspace to the ground?? Uncontrolled is G
airspace!


  #8  
Old February 19th 05, 04:35 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Russ MacDonald" wrote in message
news:kJJRd.38393$uc.8144@trnddc03...

An UNCONTROLLED field with E airspace to the ground?? Uncontrolled is G
airspace!


Yes, there are many uncontrolled fields with Class E surface areas. An
uncontrolled field is one without an operating control tower, it has nothing
to do with airspace.


  #9  
Old February 19th 05, 08:07 PM
Stan Gosnell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Russ MacDonald" wrote in news:kJJRd.38393
$uc.8144@trnddc03:


An UNCONTROLLED field with E airspace to the ground?? Uncontrolled is G
airspace!


An uncontrolled airport is one without a tower. It's not unusual for an
untowered airport to have a Class E surface area.

--
Regards,

Stan

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." B. Franklin
  #10  
Old February 14th 05, 01:31 PM
Ron Rosenfeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 04:53:59 GMT, "Russ MacDonald"
wrote:

Being from Texas, and flying mostly in the Midwest and South, I have never
asked for nor had any need for a contact approach. If I see the runway I
tell the controller, and he gives me a visual. In fact, I can't remember
ever hearing a contact approach requested around here.

Then, I whenever I fly into the Northeast and I hear contact approaches
being requested regularly. Why is the contact approach used so much in the
Northeast?


Probably because we don't meet the requirements for a visual approach
which, in addition to having the airport or preceding traffic in sight,
also require reported weather at the destination airport of at least
1000/3.


Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPS approach question Matt Whiting Instrument Flight Rules 30 August 29th 08 03:54 AM
Contact approach question Paul Tomblin Instrument Flight Rules 114 January 31st 05 06:40 PM
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? S. Ramirez Instrument Flight Rules 17 April 2nd 04 11:13 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.