China's sixth-generation fighter aircraft design based on nuclearpropulsion

On Dec 10, 7:27*am, Peter Skelton wrote:
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:08:22 -0600, Dan wrote:
Peter Skelton wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:48 -0800 (PST), guy
wrote:

On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" wrote:
"Timur" wrote in message

...

http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/20...generation-fig...
what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
building?

Is that the one where they added cialis to the gas mix to improve
rigidity?

Peter Skelton

* If it remains rigid for more than 4 hours it needs to be seen by a
physician.

That's the USN blimp which uses the obsolescent viagra
technology.

Peter Skelton- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Cancelled after the government spent billions on "range-extension"
technology, then sent it back when the "desired results" were not
achieved.

On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:28:34 -0500, Peter Skelton
wrote:

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:30:46 -0800, tankfixer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:50:03 -0800 (PST), WaltBJ
wrote:

Nuclear propulsion in a fighter? It's either going to be the biggest
heaviest fighter ever built or the mechanics will be able to perform
one (1) launch and the pilot one (1) mssion. And it better be a short
one, too, or else the pilot'll be barfing his guts out before he gets
back on final. Radiation, you know . . .
Walt BJ

I'm sure they've developed a new shielding material with the
performance of lead and the weight of balsa wood to incorporate into
this new generation of wundermachinen.

When you have billions of people why worry about the pilot ?
Just stuff a new one in for each mission...

I forsee certain difficulties with training.

Maybe they'll subcontract the training to the Alphonse Cadea Aviation
Academy..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_aircraft
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor...cle_propulsion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Templat...ear_propulsion

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:30:46 -0800, tankfixer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:50:03 -0800 (PST), WaltBJ
wrote:

Nuclear propulsion in a fighter? It's either going to be the biggest
heaviest fighter ever built or the mechanics will be able to perform
one (1) launch and the pilot one (1) mssion. And it better be a short
one, too, or else the pilot'll be barfing his guts out before he gets
back on final. Radiation, you know . . .
Walt BJ

I'm sure they've developed a new shielding material with the
performance of lead and the weight of balsa wood to incorporate into
this new generation of wundermachinen.

When you have billions of people why worry about the pilot ?
Just stuff a new one in for each mission...

I forsee certain difficulties with training.

Training ?
After the flying exhibition when they crashed the USN P3 are we sure
that China trains her pilots now ?

On Dec 10, 11:33*am, Jeff Dougherty
wrote:
On Dec 10, 2:22*am, guy wrote:



On 10 Dec, 06:29, Jeff Dougherty wrote:

On Dec 9, 3:17*pm, Jack Linthicum wrote:

On Dec 9, 3:06*pm, guy wrote:

On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" wrote:

"Timur" wrote in message

...

http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/20...generation-fig...

what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters..

Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
building?

Guy

That's "Mock 3"

I thought it was "Mach 5".

"Speed, if you don't use the nuclear drive Racer X and the Americans
are going to win this race!"

-JTD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bugger, there is a mark 2?

Guy

Yeah, and this one was drawn in Photoshop. *Imperialists beware!

-JTD

ARRGH, and to keep it topical was probably pirated....

On 10 Dec, 05:30, Dan wrote:
Richard wrote:
On Dec 9, 7:08 pm, Dan wrote:
Peter Skelton wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:48 -0800 (PST), guy
wrote:
On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" wrote:
"Timur" wrote in message
...
http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/20...generation-fig...
what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
building?
Is that the one where they added cialis to the gas mix to improve
rigidity?
Peter Skelton
* *If it remains rigid for more than 4 hours it needs to be seen by a
physician.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Puts a whole new angle on PRC.

The airship "Priapism".

* * It's the Trojan class of airship. Most noticeable is the ribbed
envelope.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Any idea what the hanger it goes in fro emtying the envelope looks
like?

Guy

guy wrote:
On 10 Dec, 05:30, Dan wrote:
Richard wrote:
On Dec 9, 7:08 pm, Dan wrote:
Peter Skelton wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:48 -0800 (PST), guy
wrote:
On 9 Dec, 19:57, "Ray O'Hara" wrote:
"Timur" wrote in message
...
http://china-arsenal.blogspot.com/20...generation-fig...
what will you post next. China's moonbase plans and its X-wing fighters?
get back to us when they build credible 3rd generation fighters.
Ray really! have you not heard about the Mach 3 dirigibles they are
building?
Is that the one where they added cialis to the gas mix to improve
rigidity?
Peter Skelton
If it remains rigid for more than 4 hours it needs to be seen by a
physician.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Puts a whole new angle on PRC.
The airship "Priapism".
It's the Trojan class of airship. Most noticeable is the ribbed
envelope.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Any idea what the hanger it goes in fro emtying the envelope looks
like?

Guy

Fire your typist.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired