If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?
I was trying to explain to a non-pilot why increased power is required
with altitude. She said "isn't the air thinner up there so there isn't as much resistance?" I said "yes, but the plane needs to fly fast enough for the air over the wings to feel like it does down low. So the speed required goes up you get higher. More speed need more power." This didn't really do the trick. Can someone think of a better way of putting it without resorting to mathematics and an explanation of IAS and TAS? TAS increases with altitude for a given power setting due to less aerodynamic drag at higher altitudes. It does not take more power to go the same speed at higher altitudes - at least, not in any of the airplanes I've ever flown. Take a look at the speed/power charts for a turbo and you'll see what I mean - if you maintain 75% power the higher you go the faster you go. If you're talking about altitude effects on the power output of a normally-aspirated engine, that's a different story. At about 8,000 feet a normally-aspirated engine will probably be putting out around 75% power at full throttle, and it will continue to decrease as you go higher. BDS |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?
Peter Dohm writes:
In a word, NO. It is an issue of physics, and physics uses a lot of math. Good physicists can explain any principle of physics without resorting to math. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?
I was trying to explain to a non-pilot why increased power is required
with altitude. She said "isn't the air thinner up there so there isn't as much resistance?" I said "yes, but the plane needs to fly fast enough for the air over the wings to feel like it does down low. So the speed required goes up you get higher. More speed need more power." This didn't really do the trick. Can someone think of a better way of putting it without resorting to mathematics and an explanation of IAS and TAS? TAS increases with altitude for a given power setting due to less aerodynamic drag at higher altitudes. It does not take more power to go the same speed at higher altitudes - at least, not in any of the airplanes I've ever flown. Take a look at the speed/power charts for a turbo and you'll see what I mean - if you maintain 75% power the higher you go the faster you go. If you're talking about altitude effects on the power output of a normally-aspirated engine, that's a different story. At about 8,000 feet a normally-aspirated engine will probably be putting out around 75% power at full throttle, and it will continue to decrease as you go higher. BDS First, I stand by my remarks as mathematically accurate. Second, you are technically correct that a given power (typically 75%) will give a greater speed with increasing altitude. However, the increase in speed will not be as much as many people seem to expect, but instead will be very close to the square root of the optomists expectation. The good news is that the graphs in the POH seem to be a good guide. Peter |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?
If you
can maintain constant power (turbo charging), you get better and better performance with altitude. The TAS will increase, but say you want to hold a specific angle of attack and its attendant IAS (maybe for range), you will need more power to do that as you get higher. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?
Actually, she's right. You need higher speed at higher altitudes in
order to maintain a given amount of lift, because the air isn't as dense. However, you don't necessarily need more power, because thin air presents a lot less resistance to the aircraft. You need more power to maintain the same amount of lift as you get higher. By "same amount of lift" I take that to mean angle of attack and the resulting IAS for the same dynamic pressure. The formula is predicated on TAS. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?
Uhm, not really. For a normally aspirated engine, the power output will
decrease during the ascent because of thinner air, which means fewer air molecules per volume to burn. I don't mean opening the throttle to make up for the engine power loss. I mean the fact that to maintain the same IAS you need more power as you go up. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?
xerj writes:
I don't mean opening the throttle to make up for the engine power loss. I mean the fact that to maintain the same IAS you need more power as you go up. Are you sure? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?
Are you sure?
Positive. Here's backup:- From http://www.av8n.com/how/htm/power.ht...power-altitude "Let's compare high-altitude flight with low-altitude flight at the same angle of attack. Assume the weight of the airplane remains the same. Then we can make a wonderful chain of deductions. At the higher altitude: a.. the lift is the same (since lift equals weight) b.. the lift-to-drag ratio is the same (since it depends on angle of attack) c.. the drag is the same (calculated from the previous two items) d.. the thrust is the same (since thrust equals drag) e.. the indicated airspeed is the same (to produce the same lift at the same angle of attack) f.. the true airspeed is greater (because density is lower) g.. the power required is greater (since power equals drag times TAS) The last step is tricky. Whereas most of the aerodynamic quantitites of interest to pilots are based on CAS, the power-per-thrust relationship depends on TAS, not CAS. This means that any aircraft requires more power to maintain a given CAS at altitude. This applies to propellers, jets, and rockets equally." |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?
"xerj" wrote I don't mean opening the throttle to make up for the engine power loss. I mean the fact that to maintain the same IAS you need more power as you go up. Why the preoccupation with IAS? At around 6,000 feet, the power of a non turbo piston engine is around 75%. As you go higher, the power drops off, but the true air speed goes up. Who cares about IAS? The question was does it take more power to go faster, right? Any non pilot will think faster means true airspeed, not indicated. -- Jim in NC |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?
TAS increases with altitude for a given power setting due to less
aerodynamic drag at higher altitudes. It does not take more power to go the same speed at higher altitudes It doesn't take more power to go the same TAS, but it does take more power to go the same IAS. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
#1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 03:04 AM |
Change in TAS with constant Power and increasing altitude. | Big John | Home Built | 6 | July 13th 03 03:29 PM |