A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 2nd 07, 04:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
BDS[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 149
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?

I was trying to explain to a non-pilot why increased power is required
with
altitude. She said "isn't the air thinner up there so there isn't as

much
resistance?" I said "yes, but the plane needs to fly fast enough for the

air
over the wings to feel like it does down low. So the speed required goes

up
you get higher. More speed need more power."

This didn't really do the trick.

Can someone think of a better way of putting it without resorting to
mathematics and an explanation of IAS and TAS?


TAS increases with altitude for a given power setting due to less
aerodynamic drag at higher altitudes. It does not take more power to go the
same speed at higher altitudes - at least, not in any of the airplanes I've
ever flown. Take a look at the speed/power charts for a turbo and you'll
see what I mean - if you maintain 75% power the higher you go the faster you
go.

If you're talking about altitude effects on the power output of a
normally-aspirated engine, that's a different story. At about 8,000 feet a
normally-aspirated engine will probably be putting out around 75% power at
full throttle, and it will continue to decrease as you go higher.

BDS


  #12  
Old February 2nd 07, 05:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?

Peter Dohm writes:

In a word, NO.

It is an issue of physics, and physics uses a lot of math.


Good physicists can explain any principle of physics without resorting
to math.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #13  
Old February 2nd 07, 06:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?

I was trying to explain to a non-pilot why increased power is required
with
altitude. She said "isn't the air thinner up there so there isn't as

much
resistance?" I said "yes, but the plane needs to fly fast enough for

the
air
over the wings to feel like it does down low. So the speed required

goes
up
you get higher. More speed need more power."

This didn't really do the trick.

Can someone think of a better way of putting it without resorting to
mathematics and an explanation of IAS and TAS?


TAS increases with altitude for a given power setting due to less
aerodynamic drag at higher altitudes. It does not take more power to go

the
same speed at higher altitudes - at least, not in any of the airplanes

I've
ever flown. Take a look at the speed/power charts for a turbo and you'll
see what I mean - if you maintain 75% power the higher you go the faster

you
go.

If you're talking about altitude effects on the power output of a
normally-aspirated engine, that's a different story. At about 8,000 feet

a
normally-aspirated engine will probably be putting out around 75% power at
full throttle, and it will continue to decrease as you go higher.

BDS

First, I stand by my remarks as mathematically accurate.

Second, you are technically correct that a given power (typically 75%) will
give a greater speed with increasing altitude. However, the increase in
speed will not be as much as many people seem to expect, but instead will be
very close to the square root of the optomists expectation.

The good news is that the graphs in the POH seem to be a good guide.

Peter


  #14  
Old February 2nd 07, 09:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
xerj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?

If you
can maintain constant power (turbo charging), you get better and
better performance with altitude.


The TAS will increase, but say you want to hold a specific angle of attack
and its attendant IAS (maybe for range), you will need more power to do that
as you get higher.


  #15  
Old February 2nd 07, 09:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
xerj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?

Actually, she's right. You need higher speed at higher altitudes in
order to maintain a given amount of lift, because the air isn't as
dense. However, you don't necessarily need more power, because thin
air presents a lot less resistance to the aircraft.


You need more power to maintain the same amount of lift as you get higher.
By "same amount of lift" I take that to mean angle of attack and the
resulting IAS for the same dynamic pressure. The formula is predicated on
TAS.


  #16  
Old February 2nd 07, 09:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
xerj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?

Uhm, not really. For a normally aspirated engine, the power output will
decrease during the ascent because of thinner air, which means fewer air
molecules per volume to burn.


I don't mean opening the throttle to make up for the engine power loss. I
mean the fact that to maintain the same IAS you need more power as you go
up.


  #17  
Old February 2nd 07, 10:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?

xerj writes:

I don't mean opening the throttle to make up for the engine power loss. I
mean the fact that to maintain the same IAS you need more power as you go
up.


Are you sure?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #18  
Old February 2nd 07, 10:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
xerj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?

Are you sure?

Positive.

Here's backup:-

From http://www.av8n.com/how/htm/power.ht...power-altitude

"Let's compare high-altitude flight with low-altitude flight at the same
angle of attack. Assume the weight of the airplane remains the same. Then we
can make a wonderful chain of deductions.

At the higher altitude:
a.. the lift is the same (since lift equals weight)
b.. the lift-to-drag ratio is the same (since it depends on angle of
attack)
c.. the drag is the same (calculated from the previous two items)
d.. the thrust is the same (since thrust equals drag)
e.. the indicated airspeed is the same (to produce the same lift at the
same angle of attack)
f.. the true airspeed is greater (because density is lower)
g.. the power required is greater (since power equals drag times TAS)
The last step is tricky. Whereas most of the aerodynamic quantitites of
interest to pilots are based on CAS, the power-per-thrust relationship
depends on TAS, not CAS.

This means that any aircraft requires more power to maintain a given CAS at
altitude. This applies to propellers, jets, and rockets equally."



  #19  
Old February 2nd 07, 10:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 146
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?


"xerj" wrote

I don't mean opening the throttle to make up for the engine power loss. I
mean the fact that to maintain the same IAS you need more power as you go
up.


Why the preoccupation with IAS?

At around 6,000 feet, the power of a non turbo piston engine is around 75%.
As you go higher, the power drops off, but the true air speed goes up.

Who cares about IAS? The question was does it take more power to go faster,
right? Any non pilot will think faster means true airspeed, not indicated.
--
Jim in NC

  #20  
Old February 2nd 07, 10:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
xerj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Increasing power required with altitude.. what's a good plain english explanation?

TAS increases with altitude for a given power setting due to less
aerodynamic drag at higher altitudes. It does not take more power to go
the
same speed at higher altitudes


It doesn't take more power to go the same TAS, but it does take more power
to go the same IAS.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
#1 Jet of World War II Christopher Military Aviation 203 September 1st 03 03:04 AM
Change in TAS with constant Power and increasing altitude. Big John Home Built 6 July 13th 03 03:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.