If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The Unmanned Combat Air System Carrier Demonstration Program: A New Dawn for Naval Aviation?
On Jul 15, 12:15 pm, "John Carrier" wrote:
Not really. The sensor suite and latency in control doesn't make these things ideal for turning and burning. Higher fuel fraction leads to greater persistency, elimination of crew makes stealth easier to achieve and the asset better for high threat environments. A cheaper, smaller and more readily disposable interdiction tool. The price is you've eliminated the decision maker in the cockpit, something you can't always and wouldn't always want to do. R / John With respect to your years of experience John I've heard that argument and agree there will always be situations that back it. But I've also seen counter examples. Harlan Reep used to fly as a contractor here for decades. He was a combat vet and normally flew the drones in the live A/A tests. Occasionaly he would fly other targets in non-shooting tests and flew for us several times when I was working in flight test (89-91.) I remember near the end of his career he flew a QF-86 against a couple Hornets. It was the last Sabre drone in our inventory so there was a lot of attention/nostalgia on the test. It was planned that the Sabre would be shot down even if it survived the test so both Hornets went up with the test missiles and rounds for the cannon. In a nutshell the Sabre survived the test, and then they allowed players to go into the shootdown with Harlan being allowed to 'do his best' to evade. He did, and although there was some hits, the Hornets landed with empty magazines and racks. IIRC Harlan crashed the drone because they didn't want to take the chance that thee was damage to the drone that would cause a crash on landing. They featured a story on the encounter in the Base paper so it wasn't just O'club stories that I remember this from. Of course, I _do_ remember some of the O'club excuses being offered that week (ie. he didn't have to worry about g-block, he could 'fly the wings off... etc.) All in all it made a great day for all the nostalgiac people who had been involved with the Sabre's during their years of use as targets here at the Lake. BB I guess everybody has some mountain to climb. It's just fate whether you live in Kansas or Tibet... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
X-45A unmanned combat air vehicle 060922-F-1234P-103.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | November 19th 06 09:27 PM |
Indian naval variant of the Light Combat Aircraft by 2010. | Henry J. Cobb | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 6th 04 03:30 PM |
Future Combat Systems program networked vehicles and drones | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 1 | December 13th 03 07:24 PM |
Joint Unmanned Combat Air Systems | buf3 | Military Aviation | 0 | November 5th 03 10:31 AM |