My 1 2 3 Test info

On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:31:22 -0400, "Glen in Orlando"
wrote:

JRW..
it is bizarre isn't it?
This is supposed to be about sharing airplane pix. Yet it turns into little
more then a study in watching grown people act like children. Especially
when we don't know each others real identity, and can change our identity at
will. Seems borderline psychotic to me.

J-3's pics are interesting.. but one has to wonder why anyone would want to
spend as much time as he does posting pix that are already available, easier
to view elsewhere, and could be resized and posted much faster with less
bandwidth then the method he uses....

It really seems that we have quite a few 'troubled' individuals here. The
unfortunate downside of all this is that over the past year or so a number
of truly gifted photographers have pretty much given up on posting their
stuff here. I don't blame them as their efforts get blown out of the water
by these floods that push their stuff off of the servers in short order...
sigh.

So start the attacks folks.. But remember.. your attacking an anonymous
name.... tomorrow I could be Tim in Toledo.. that's how nuts you've all
become...

gotta go fly...

Glen in Orlando

Classic neurotic passive-aggresive behavior. Come out all superior,
accuse others of being "troubled," then retreat into anonymity. Putz

I have no problem with anyone who wants to honestly and maturely
debate the merits of .rar vs. individual photos, and those who
genuinely would like to learn more about various forms of posting. If
the majority decide upon a particular format, so be it. I don't -for
example- mind yEnc myself, but many others loathe it.

I do have a problem with jackassery, and Glen the troll just stoutly
identified himself so. Dolt.

On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:11:29 +0200, JRW wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:40:52 +0200, JRW wrote:


Peter Hucker wrote:

On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:30:15 +0200, JRW wrote:



Peter Hucker wrote:


On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 22:45:40 +0200, JRW wrote:




Peter Hucker wrote:



On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 06:52:31 -0400, "Glen in Orlando"
wrote:





Hey Clem...
the most effective method, as compared to your three posts.. is right
here....
Resized to a whopping 135kb...
Quck, easy, and guess what.. a good old fashioned JPEG....
I can view anything posted here...yENC, Mime, etc..etc..
but WHAT IS THE POINT?




The point is you've removed half the data in the file.




Hogwash, then you are saying that all the other posters should post such
large files. Don't think so.

It's been asked a few times, just why you need such "high quality". The
loss of quality that I have from my photos is minimal.
You don't see this sort of crap going on in other picture groups and I
know you are in some of them. So do tell, why do you expressly need this
"so called high quality"?
If it's for commercial use, you are in the wrong place!!! And that's a fact!



If you resize it, you are removing a LOT of data.



lol so much for not answering the question. Again: WHY, do you, need
such high quality?


Because I don't just look at them once.


Oh, like that makes the difference....lol
So those 1024's that the folks post are good enough for you? Does that
mean you "only" download "high quality"....

Are you a nerd? Seems like it??


Even if I looked at them once, why would I want to miss the details?

Personally I don't believe you even know what you are talking about.
I'll leave it at that.
Have a good life nerd.
Last post to your very very very tired ass.
And kill file you, oh no, I like seeing you make an ass out of yourself.

I look at pictures so I can see them properly. I don't want postage
stamps. I may want one as a wallpaper, or to print out. I may wish
to look at part of it closely.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

What do Disney World & Viagra have in common?
They both make you wait an hour for a five-minute ride.

On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:09:36 +0200, JRW wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:42:50 +0200, JRW wrote:


Peter Hucker wrote:

On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:35:01 +0200, JRW wrote:



Peter Hucker wrote:


They were on topic pictures.

On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:07:11 -0500, "Terry M" wrote:




There is a test binary group. May I suggest using that so that you don't
flood this group until you are prepared to post. Not trying to be a smart
a.. - just a friendly suggestion as I know you were trying to accomplish
something good.


"Clem" wrote in message
. 97.136...



Using Xnews, I just did 3 uploads of an F-4 picture file which shows
almost
4KB.

The first test was a straight upload. It was broke into 10 files of 8K and
one at 5714.

The second was with MIME. It also was broke into 11 files with very near
the
same results.

The third test was an upload in yEnc. This time the file was broke into
only
10 sections nine of which were in the 3200 range and one in the 2000
range.

Someone said yEnc creates a larger file. I'm at a loss how that is figured
seeing as this test indicates the opposit.

I'm not trying to start an argument, I'm trying to discover the most
effective method to upload as compared to a standard generic upload.



And he stated that he was "testing". You are testing if you are choosing


from three different posting methods.


It was only merely pointed out to him that there are tests groups. Both
myself and Terry pointed that out.
He had no problems with that, so why are you chirping in? He then asked
for suggestions which he gladly received.
Think again Sherlock.


Terry wrote "There is a test binary group. May I suggest using that".
But his posts here were not causing a problem.


and neither was mine. I told him where a test site was. You just babble
on about BS.
Get a life.


You told him about something for no reason.

Then let him tell me. Look who's trying to police the group...lol
It was none of your business in the first place.
Get lost and get lost from the other groups you are disrupting.
You said in one post that you were bored so you looked something up. I
think "bored"was the right choice of words.
This is not a place to let out your frustrations.
Get a life or buy a dog..or something.
WHOOSHY

I'm not policing anything, I'm objecting to those who are.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

Cobra: 2 conjoined bras.