A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 1st 09, 06:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
T.L. Davis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 22
Default F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace

On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike
wrote:

....By 1997 officials
had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in
Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11,
2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United States.


Unbelievable, isn't it? 14 aircraft to protect the entire continental
United States... This was what NORAD was reduced to?? Pitiful.
What was the defense budget in 2001?? Who got all the money?

What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears
and long range escorts?

Just incredible. I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft
available on 9/11. I overestimated. This is what happens when a
country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's
happened before.

At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia".

And the best is too good for America. F-35s are good enough.

TL
  #2  
Old February 1st 09, 12:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Jack Linthicum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 301
Default F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace

On Feb 1, 1:16*am, T.L. Davis wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike
wrote:

...By 1997 officials

had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in
Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11,
2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United States.


Unbelievable, isn't it? *14 aircraft to protect the entire continental
United States... *This was what NORAD was reduced to?? *Pitiful.
What was the defense budget in 2001?? *Who got all the money?

What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears
and long range escorts?

Just incredible. *I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft
available on 9/11. *I overestimated. *This is what happens when a
country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's
happened before.

At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia".

And the best is too good for America. *F-35s are good enough.

TL


I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are
about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could
muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able
to handle them. You don't?
  #3  
Old February 1st 09, 01:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
damarkley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace

Jack Linthicum wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:16 am, T.L. Davis wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike
wrote:

...By 1997 officials

had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in
Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11,
2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United States.

Unbelievable, isn't it? 14 aircraft to protect the entire continental
United States... This was what NORAD was reduced to?? Pitiful.
What was the defense budget in 2001?? Who got all the money?

What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears
and long range escorts?

Just incredible. I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft
available on 9/11. I overestimated. This is what happens when a
country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's
happened before.

At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia".

And the best is too good for America. F-35s are good enough.

TL


I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are
about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could
muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able
to handle them. You don't?

Yes, there are no more "waves" of Bears. And the number of Blackjacks
is almost insignificant. There is no plausible reason for Russia to use
those planes in such fashion. I am curious as to what a "ong range
escort" would be.

Dean
  #4  
Old February 1st 09, 05:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Dan[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 451
Default F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace

damarkley wrote:
Jack Linthicum wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:16 am, T.L. Davis wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike
wrote:

...By 1997 officials

had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in
Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11,
2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United
States.
Unbelievable, isn't it? 14 aircraft to protect the entire continental
United States... This was what NORAD was reduced to?? Pitiful.
What was the defense budget in 2001?? Who got all the money?

What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears
and long range escorts?

Just incredible. I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft
available on 9/11. I overestimated. This is what happens when a
country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's
happened before.

At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia".

And the best is too good for America. F-35s are good enough.

TL


I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are
about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could
muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able
to handle them. You don't?

Yes, there are no more "waves" of Bears. And the number of Blackjacks
is almost insignificant. There is no plausible reason for Russia to use
those planes in such fashion. I am curious as to what a "ong range
escort" would be.

Dean


"Long range escort" = call girl along for the ride?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #5  
Old February 1st 09, 06:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
damarkley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace

Dan wrote:
damarkley wrote:
Jack Linthicum wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:16 am, T.L. Davis wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike
wrote:

...By 1997 officials

had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in
Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11,
2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United
States.
Unbelievable, isn't it? 14 aircraft to protect the entire continental
United States... This was what NORAD was reduced to?? Pitiful.
What was the defense budget in 2001?? Who got all the money?

What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears
and long range escorts?

Just incredible. I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft
available on 9/11. I overestimated. This is what happens when a
country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's
happened before.

At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia".

And the best is too good for America. F-35s are good enough.

TL

I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are
about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could
muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able
to handle them. You don't?

Yes, there are no more "waves" of Bears. And the number of Blackjacks
is almost insignificant. There is no plausible reason for Russia to
use those planes in such fashion. I am curious as to what a "ong
range escort" would be.

Dean


"Long range escort" = call girl along for the ride?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

The Russians do claim to be capitalists, so its possible!
  #6  
Old February 1st 09, 02:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Peter Skelton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 93
Default F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace

On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 04:43:59 -0800 (PST), Jack Linthicum
wrote:

On Feb 1, 1:16*am, T.L. Davis wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike
wrote:

...By 1997 officials

had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in
Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11,
2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United States.


Unbelievable, isn't it? *14 aircraft to protect the entire continental
United States... *This was what NORAD was reduced to?? *Pitiful.
What was the defense budget in 2001?? *Who got all the money?

What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears
and long range escorts?

Just incredible. *I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft
available on 9/11. *I overestimated. *This is what happens when a
country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's
happened before.

At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia".

And the best is too good for America. *F-35s are good enough.

TL


I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are
about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could
muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able
to handle them. You don't?


The 14 aircraft do not include those in Alaska and the Canadian
Forces aircraft. In other words, they don't include the folks
tasked with providing defense against the threat he's ranting
about.


Peter Skelton
  #7  
Old February 1st 09, 03:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Andrew Chaplin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 728
Default F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 04:43:59 -0800 (PST), Jack Linthicum
wrote:

On Feb 1, 1:16 am, T.L. Davis wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike
wrote:

...By 1997 officials

had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in
Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11,
2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United
States.

Unbelievable, isn't it? 14 aircraft to protect the entire continental
United States... This was what NORAD was reduced to?? Pitiful.
What was the defense budget in 2001?? Who got all the money?

What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears
and long range escorts?

Just incredible. I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft
available on 9/11. I overestimated. This is what happens when a
country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's
happened before.

At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia".

And the best is too good for America. F-35s are good enough.

TL


I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are
about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could
muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able
to handle them. You don't?


The 14 aircraft do not include those in Alaska and the Canadian
Forces aircraft. In other words, they don't include the folks
tasked with providing defense against the threat he's ranting
about.


True, but I think the Canadian aircraft only bring the total to 20, 22 at the
most. I am not sure how many QRA are stood to in Alaska at any one time.
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)


  #8  
Old February 1st 09, 05:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Peter Skelton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 93
Default F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace

On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:51:56 -0500, "Andrew Chaplin"
wrote:

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 04:43:59 -0800 (PST), Jack Linthicum
wrote:

On Feb 1, 1:16 am, T.L. Davis wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike
wrote:

...By 1997 officials

had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in
Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11,
2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United
States.

Unbelievable, isn't it? 14 aircraft to protect the entire continental
United States... This was what NORAD was reduced to?? Pitiful.
What was the defense budget in 2001?? Who got all the money?

What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears
and long range escorts?

Just incredible. I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft
available on 9/11. I overestimated. This is what happens when a
country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's
happened before.

At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia".

And the best is too good for America. F-35s are good enough.

TL

I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are
about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could
muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able
to handle them. You don't?


The 14 aircraft do not include those in Alaska and the Canadian
Forces aircraft. In other words, they don't include the folks
tasked with providing defense against the threat he's ranting
about.


True, but I think the Canadian aircraft only bring the total to 20, 22 at the
most. I am not sure how many QRA are stood to in Alaska at any one time.


Four at each of two bases on immediate plus eight each that could
be available in time less whatever has been siphoned off by Noble
Eagle isn't it?


Peter Skelton
  #9  
Old February 3rd 09, 02:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Ian B MacLure
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 100
Default F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace

Peter Skelton wrote in
:

[snip]

The 14 aircraft do not include those in Alaska and the Canadian
Forces aircraft. In other words, they don't include the folks
tasked with providing defense against the threat he's ranting
about.


I think the al-Qanadian contribution might have amounted to maybe
8 aircraft on a good day. They only have some 4 dozen or so in
in service.

IBM
  #10  
Old February 1st 09, 05:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Dan[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 451
Default F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace

Jack Linthicum wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:16 am, T.L. Davis wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:32:20 -0800 (PST), Mike
wrote:

...By 1997 officials

had suggested a "four corners" defense, maintaining alert sites in
Massachusetts, Oregon, California, and Florida. By September 11,
2001,only 14 interceptor aircraft were sitting alert in the United States.

Unbelievable, isn't it? 14 aircraft to protect the entire continental
United States... This was what NORAD was reduced to?? Pitiful.
What was the defense budget in 2001?? Who got all the money?

What if Russia had launched an old style attack with waves of Bears
and long range escorts?

Just incredible. I had thought that we had all of 16 aircraft
available on 9/11. I overestimated. This is what happens when a
country becomes grossly overconfident in its own defenses, and it's
happened before.

At times we are truly "The United States of Amnesia".

And the best is too good for America. F-35s are good enough.

TL


I think the early-warning radar still works. Those waves of Bears are
about gone. Total 64 in service, guess 40 would be the most they could
muster for waves, 15 hour plus flight time, I think we might be able
to handle them. You don't?


Not to mention Russia has nothing to gain using bombers instead of
ICBM and SLBM if they wish to start something stupid.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help Us Protect Wickenburg Municipal Airport Mike[_22_] Piloting 0 September 10th 08 05:39 AM
Help Us Protect Wickenburg Municipal Airport [email protected] Piloting 1 September 7th 08 09:46 AM
Wichita Airspace Question and overlapping airspace Owen[_4_] Piloting 1 February 14th 07 09:35 PM
Two airspace classes for one airspace? (KOQU) John R Piloting 8 June 30th 04 04:46 AM
String in the middle does not protect you from a spin Jim Soaring 10 January 30th 04 02:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.