A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Criticism Meets New Exhibit of Plane That Carried A-Bomb



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old November 2nd 03, 11:39 PM
Otis Willie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Criticism Meets New Exhibit of Plane That Carried A-Bomb

Criticism Meets New Exhibit of Plane That Carried A-Bomb

(EXCERPT) By ELIZABETH OLSON

ASHINGTON, Oct. 31 — When officials at the Smithsonian Institution
unveiled a new home for the World War II bomber the Enola Gay in
August, they had hoped to avoid the kind of controversy that had
previously plagued efforts to exhibit the airplane that carried the
first atomic bomb.

Not likely. Now a group of scholars, writers, activists and others
have signed a petition criticizing the exhibit for labeling the Enola
Gay as "the largest and most technologically advanced airplane for its
time" without mentioning that the Boeing B-29 dropped the bomb on
Hiroshima.

"You wouldn't display a slave ship solely as a model of technological
advancement," said David Nasaw, a cultural historian at CUNY Graduate
Center, and one of more than 100 signers of the petition. "It would be
offensive not to put it in context."

Peter J. Kuznick, the director of the Nuclear Studies Institute at
American University, who initiated the petition along with members of
the antiwar group Peace Action, emphasized that they were not opposed
to the display. "It is essential that the plane be displayed," Mr.
Kuznick said, "but it must include discussions about the decision to
drop the bomb."

He said he and other signers hoped "to sit down with Smithsonian
officials to see the seriousness of this...

U.S. and friendly nation laws prohibit fully reproducing
copyrighted material. In abidance with our laws this report
cannot be provided in its entirety. However, you can read it
in full today, 02 Nov 2003, at the following URL. (COMBINE
the following lines into your web browser.) The
subject/content of this report is not necessarily the
viewpoint of the distributing Library. This report is provided
for your information and discussion.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/02/na...rint&position=

---------------------------
Otis Willie
Associate Librarian
The American War Library
http://www.americanwarlibrary.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 November 9th 04 03:47 PM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 November 1st 04 06:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 November 1st 03 06:27 AM
Conspiracy Theorists (amusing) Grantland Military Aviation 1 October 2nd 03 12:17 AM
A Good Story Badwater Bill Home Built 15 September 3rd 03 03:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.