A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

First Aircraft to 'use' TFR



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 3rd 03, 05:37 AM
S. Sampson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default First Aircraft to 'use' TFR

"Jeremy Thomson" wrote
I put the 'use' in quotes becuase I believe TFR modes on radars have
been around since the 50's.



Vulcan bomber. TFR worked just fine.


  #2  
Old July 3rd 03, 11:18 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


I put the 'use' in quotes becuase I believe TFR modes on radars have
been around since the 50's.


Is there an activity more addicted to acronyms than flying?

To me, TFR means Temporary Flight Restriction, as when Bush II visits
Bush I at Kennebunkport and shuts down Cub operations within 30 miles.

(Incidentally, I got permission to enter the Class D airspace that
envelopes my home, so I could tour the area and show off my flying
skills to an adoring family. ATC kept asking me things like: "Are you
to the north?" "I just crossed Adams Point 2 miles west." "Is that you
circling?" At this point it dawned on me that ATC was looking at his
radar and simply couldn't see the Cub because it has no transponder
and no aluminum except for the cowling.)


all the best -- Dan Ford (email: info AT danford.net)

see the Warbird's Forum at http://www.danford.net/index.htm
Vietnam | Flying Tigers | Pacific War | Brewster Buffalo | Piper Cub
  #3  
Old July 3rd 03, 01:26 PM
Anonymous
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Cub Driver wrote in message ...

I put the 'use' in quotes becuase I believe TFR modes on radars have
been around since the 50's.


Is there an activity more addicted to acronyms than flying?


Computing. Oh yes.

AI
ASCII
GB
KB
MB
PCMCIA
ISA
PCI
AGP
EISA
RAM
ROM
CPU
MHz
GHz
SDR
DDR
IDE
ATAPI
SCSI
SATA
DOS
CD
CDR
CDRW
DVD
DVDR
DVDRW
....
....
....

The list is seemingly endless. I could go on with the acronyms...

Cheers
Graeme


  #4  
Old July 3rd 03, 02:05 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"S. Sampson" wrote in message
...

Vulcan bomber. TFR worked just fine.


Wasn't TFR a post-production modification to the Vulcan?



  #5  
Old July 4th 03, 12:17 AM
Bill Silvey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
rthlink.net
"S. Sampson" wrote in message
...

Vulcan bomber. TFR worked just fine.


Wasn't TFR a post-production modification to the Vulcan?


Didn't A6-A have TFR? Or am I thinking radar altimeter...?

--
http://www.delversdungeon.dragonsfoot.org
Remove the X's in my email address to respond.
"Damn you Silvey, and your endless fortunes." - Stephen Weir
I hate furries.


  #6  
Old July 4th 03, 12:24 AM
John R Weiss
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bill Silvey" wrote...

Didn't A6-A have TFR? Or am I thinking radar altimeter...?


The A-6 had TFR, but it wasn't connected to the autopilot. Terrain Following
flight was done manually, with reference to the TFR display.

  #7  
Old July 4th 03, 12:36 AM
Bill Silvey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:JW2Na.97575$R73.10439@sccrnsc04
"Bill Silvey" wrote...

Didn't A6-A have TFR? Or am I thinking radar altimeter...?


The A-6 had TFR, but it wasn't connected to the autopilot. Terrain
Following flight was done manually, with reference to the TFR display.


"You so much as hiccup at that altitude and you're dead." Grafton resisted
telling Parker he wasn't given to hiccups when flying over North Vietnam.



--
http://www.delversdungeon.dragonsfoot.org
Remove the X's in my email address to respond.
"Damn you Silvey, and your endless fortunes." - Stephen Weir
I hate furries.


  #8  
Old July 12th 03, 01:02 AM
John Halliwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Bill Silvey
writes
"You so much as hiccup at that altitude and you're dead." Grafton resisted
telling Parker he wasn't given to hiccups when flying over North Vietnam.


Bit like Guy Gibson V.C. discussing flying 60ft over water at night in
WWII "You only need to hiccup at that height and you'd be in the drink".

--
John
  #9  
Old July 4th 03, 12:50 AM
The Raven
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
rthlink.net...

"S. Sampson" wrote in message
...

Vulcan bomber. TFR worked just fine.


Wasn't TFR a post-production modification to the Vulcan?


Yes, it was originally intended for high altitude bombing. Amazing how the
aircraft was so versatile.

The Raven


  #10  
Old July 4th 03, 07:25 AM
robert arndt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"The Raven" wrote in message ...
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
rthlink.net...

"S. Sampson" wrote in message
...

Vulcan bomber. TFR worked just fine.


Wasn't TFR a post-production modification to the Vulcan?


Yes, it was originally intended for high altitude bombing. Amazing how the
aircraft was so versatile.

The Raven



The modification was introduced in 1966 to all the RAFs bombers;
however, the previously cancelled TSR-2 would have had a highly
advanced Ferranti TFR. One aircraft prototype minus the TFR performed
low level terrain following at 250' at Mach .9 shadowed by a
Lightning. Since 1962 RAF bomber pilots were being trained to fly low
and fast at between 300-500 ft. The TSR-2 with the Ferranti TFR would
have been a fantastic low level penetrator as its TFR was designed to
allow the pilots to hug the earth at over Mach 1.

Rob

Rob

Rob
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 40 October 3rd 08 03:13 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 October 1st 04 02:31 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 September 2nd 04 05:15 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 4 August 7th 03 05:12 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.