A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Interesting Reading



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 23rd 04, 04:05 AM
EDR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Interesting Reading

I enjoy going to the US military safety websites and reading the annual
mishap report review.
They describe the different classes of mishap (severity) and list the
associated costs of each mishap (your tax dollars at work!).
Remember the B-1B that went down off Diego Garcia?
It resulted from an engine shutdown after takeoff; which lead to the
loss of the first generator; followed by the loss of the second
generator; followed by the loss of the backup system.
Get this... the DSO and OSO (guys in back), based on the instruments at
their stations, told the pilots the aircraft was out of control and
punched out. Shortly thereafter, the pilot concluded that the aircraft
was indeed out of control and followed the non-flying personal out of
the aircraft.
The accident board listed, among the reasons for the loss of the
aircraft, "contributing design deficiencies".
BTW, the cost of the loss... $298,000,000.
  #2  
Old April 23rd 04, 05:26 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Don't ever call a DSO or OSO, "non-flying" personnel. I worked hard for that
rating. They are "rated wings" as opposed to "non rated aircrew".

And it is obvious that the OSO/DSO knew what was happening when the "flying
crew members" did not. It's not the first time the "Nav" saved a crew, and
all the way across the pond, the Nav is the only guy that really knows where
you are.

The aircraft was built with 3 generators, and room for a fourth that was not
installed to save production $$$. It was determined that it was not "needed"
when the electrically heated engine intake anti-ice system would not be
installed.

Also, the APUs cannot be run in-flight, there is a drive shaft from each APU
(there are two) to a Generator that could have brought a generator back
online. APU power on the ground brings 2 generators online.

Funny that the humanoid stick shakers up front could not fly partial panel
with a whiskey compass and air driven attitude indicator and an altimeter
that is not tied to the Air Data Computers.

BT
(20yrs AF Nav, 15 yrs B-1 IOSO) Retired

"EDR" wrote in message
...
I enjoy going to the US military safety websites and reading the annual
mishap report review.
They describe the different classes of mishap (severity) and list the
associated costs of each mishap (your tax dollars at work!).
Remember the B-1B that went down off Diego Garcia?
It resulted from an engine shutdown after takeoff; which lead to the
loss of the first generator; followed by the loss of the second
generator; followed by the loss of the backup system.
Get this... the DSO and OSO (guys in back), based on the instruments at
their stations, told the pilots the aircraft was out of control and
punched out. Shortly thereafter, the pilot concluded that the aircraft
was indeed out of control and followed the non-flying personal out of
the aircraft.
The accident board listed, among the reasons for the loss of the
aircraft, "contributing design deficiencies".
BTW, the cost of the loss... $298,000,000.



  #3  
Old April 23rd 04, 12:26 PM
Nathan Young
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Is the B1B a fly-by wire? If so, does it have computer-assist
stability like the F117 or B2? If the controls are hydraulic - what
runs the hydraulic pumps engine or electric?

If any of the above are true, it seems like good reason to bail out
based upon electrical failure.

-Nathan



On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 21:26:42 -0700, "BTIZ"
wrote:

Don't ever call a DSO or OSO, "non-flying" personnel. I worked hard for that
rating. They are "rated wings" as opposed to "non rated aircrew".

And it is obvious that the OSO/DSO knew what was happening when the "flying
crew members" did not. It's not the first time the "Nav" saved a crew, and
all the way across the pond, the Nav is the only guy that really knows where
you are.

The aircraft was built with 3 generators, and room for a fourth that was not
installed to save production $$$. It was determined that it was not "needed"
when the electrically heated engine intake anti-ice system would not be
installed.

Also, the APUs cannot be run in-flight, there is a drive shaft from each APU
(there are two) to a Generator that could have brought a generator back
online. APU power on the ground brings 2 generators online.

Funny that the humanoid stick shakers up front could not fly partial panel
with a whiskey compass and air driven attitude indicator and an altimeter
that is not tied to the Air Data Computers.

BT
(20yrs AF Nav, 15 yrs B-1 IOSO) Retired

"EDR" wrote in message
...
I enjoy going to the US military safety websites and reading the annual
mishap report review.
They describe the different classes of mishap (severity) and list the
associated costs of each mishap (your tax dollars at work!).
Remember the B-1B that went down off Diego Garcia?
It resulted from an engine shutdown after takeoff; which lead to the
loss of the first generator; followed by the loss of the second
generator; followed by the loss of the backup system.
Get this... the DSO and OSO (guys in back), based on the instruments at
their stations, told the pilots the aircraft was out of control and
punched out. Shortly thereafter, the pilot concluded that the aircraft
was indeed out of control and followed the non-flying personal out of
the aircraft.
The accident board listed, among the reasons for the loss of the
aircraft, "contributing design deficiencies".
BTW, the cost of the loss... $298,000,000.



  #4  
Old April 23rd 04, 01:36 PM
EDR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article 5W0ic.19808$432.8732@fed1read01, BTIZ
wrote:

Don't ever call a DSO or OSO, "non-flying" personnel. I worked hard for that
rating. They are "rated wings" as opposed to "non rated aircrew".


My apologies to those rated aircrew for my misuse of the term
non-flying.
  #5  
Old April 23rd 04, 02:31 PM
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

EDR wrote in message ...
I enjoy going to the US military safety websites and reading the annual
mishap report review.
snip


Can you post the web site address? Sounds like interesting reading...

Thanks!
  #6  
Old April 23rd 04, 06:44 PM
EDR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Mark
wrote:

Can you post the web site address? Sounds like interesting reading...


Here is the USAF site:

http://afsafety.af.mil/magazine/htdocs/pdf/fsmj_f03.pdf

Here is the USN site:

http://www.safetycenter.navy.mil/aviation/default.htm
  #7  
Old April 24th 04, 02:45 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Nathan Young" wrote in message
...
Is the B1B a fly-by wire?

NO

If so, does it have computer-assist stability like the F117 or B2?

NO

If the controls are hydraulic - what runs the hydraulic pumps engine or

electric?

Hydro from the engines

If any of the above are true, it seems like good reason to bail out
based upon electrical failure.


It's not true, but flying with total electrical failure is tough, and if
they could not get them back online or get the plane on the ground in a
reasonable time. It would be time to give the jet back to the tax payers.

BT


  #8  
Old April 24th 04, 02:45 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

accepted

BT

"EDR" wrote in message
...
In article 5W0ic.19808$432.8732@fed1read01, BTIZ
wrote:

Don't ever call a DSO or OSO, "non-flying" personnel. I worked hard for

that
rating. They are "rated wings" as opposed to "non rated aircrew".


My apologies to those rated aircrew for my misuse of the term
non-flying.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KRMN ILS 33- Interesting Approach Brad Z Instrument Flight Rules 11 May 21st 04 10:53 PM
high copper reading in oil analysis [email protected] Owning 1 March 26th 04 03:32 PM
FA: WWII Weekend 1991 Program - Reading, PA Disgo Aviation Marketplace 0 February 6th 04 05:18 PM
Interesting Read john smith Piloting 0 January 11th 04 06:54 PM
ATC Privatization - interesting reading Simon General Aviation 1 August 31st 03 04:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.