If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense.
In an 8 to 1 decision the scotus kicked Bush on the ass for his trashing of the
Bill of Rights. It is about time Bush was placed on the slippery slope he so well desreves. Thank you SCOTUS. Even the neocons have had enough of him Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"ArtKramr" wrote in message
... In an 8 to 1 decision the scotus kicked Bush on the ass for his trashing of the Bill of Rights. It is about time Bush was placed on the slippery slope he so well desreves. Thank you SCOTUS. Even the neocons have had enough of him What a strange conclusion! I'm not sure who these neocons are you keep mentioning (and I bet you don't know either, it's probably just a new catch phrase you learned and like to use to avoid having to try to express complex ideas) but the Supreme Court has ruled against the government many times over the last few years. What makes this ruling so significant? The ruling is pretty complicated. You can read some of the details he http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...3350_2004jun28 Jarg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"ArtKramr" wrote in message
... Subject: Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense. From: "Jarg" Date: 6/29/2004 9:28 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... In an 8 to 1 decision the scotus kicked Bush on the ass for his trashing of the Bill of Rights. It is about time Bush was placed on the slippery slope he so well desreves. Thank you SCOTUS. Even the neocons have had enough of him What a strange conclusion! I'm not sure who these neocons are you keep mentioning (and I bet you don't know either, it's probably just a new catch phrase you learned and like to use to avoid having to try to express complex ideas) but the Supreme Court has ruled against the government many times over the last few years. What makes this ruling so significant? The ruling is pretty complicated. You can read some of the details he http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp.../washpost/2004 0629/ts_washpost/a13350_2004jun28 Jarg Bush's defense was that in time of war balance of powers no longer exist and the president as commander in chief has final word on all issues. Could you provide a reference for this contention? I have never heard anything like this from President Bush myself. The description of the court decision doens't mention it either. The ruling was regarding the legal rights of enemy combatants. SCOTUS said "war does not give the president a blank check to go outside the constitution and the bill of rights.". That slaps down Bush's delusions of grandeur. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
That slaps down Bush's delusions of grandeur.
The only one here with delusions of grandeur is you, Art. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense.
From: "Jarg" Date: 6/29/2004 10:37 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense. From: "Jarg" Date: 6/29/2004 9:28 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... In an 8 to 1 decision the scotus kicked Bush on the ass for his trashing of the Bill of Rights. It is about time Bush was placed on the slippery slope he so well desreves. Thank you SCOTUS. Even the neocons have had enough of him What a strange conclusion! I'm not sure who these neocons are you keep mentioning (and I bet you don't know either, it's probably just a new catch phrase you learned and like to use to avoid having to try to express complex ideas) but the Supreme Court has ruled against the government many times over the last few years. What makes this ruling so significant? The ruling is pretty complicated. You can read some of the details he http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp.../washpost/2004 0629/ts_washpost/a13350_2004jun28 Jarg Bush's defense was that in time of war balance of powers no longer exist and the president as commander in chief has final word on all issues. Could you provide a reference for this contention? I have never heard anything like this from President Bush myself. The description of the court decision doens't mention it either. The ruling was regarding the legal rights of enemy combatants. SCOTUS said "war does not give the president a blank check to go outside the constitution and the bill of rights.". That slaps down Bush's delusions of grandeur. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer Read the caselaw Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"ArtKramr" wrote in message
... Subject: Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense. From: "Jarg" Date: 6/29/2004 10:37 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: http://www.coastcomp.com Read the caselaw That's it? You make these claims and then you can't provide any supporting citations? Your already limited credibility continues to drop. Jarg |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense.
From: "Jarg" Date: 6/29/2004 12:18 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Even the SCOTUS is fed up with Bush's nonsense. From: "Jarg" Date: 6/29/2004 10:37 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: http://www.coastcomp.com Read the caselaw That's it? You make these claims and then you can't provide any supporting citations? Your already limited credibility continues to drop. Jarg You obviously don't know what caselaw is. Caselaw is the ultimate credibility in a supreme court decision. And since you have descended to personal insults...PLONK ! Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Greasy Rider @ Invalid.com wrote in message
news On 29 Jun 2004 22:42:46 GMT, (ArtKramr) proclaimed: And since you have descended to personal insults...PLONK ! Oh my God! Not the dreaded PLONK! What a cruel fate. But an great tactic to avoid having your nose rubbed in a losing an argument! And did you notice that the "personal insults" didn't actually occur? I'm afraid the poor guy is deteriorating quickly. Jarg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
best president ever | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 6 | February 16th 04 06:59 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
Families of soldiers condemn Bush's war | Mark Test | Military Aviation | 40 | November 16th 03 08:29 AM |