A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Phantom at Fallon



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old November 20th 04, 12:12 AM
Mike Kanze
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No smiley, or obvious pointers to humour, or other versions, so I have the
horrible feeling it might be true.


H. L. Mencken once said, "No one ever went broke underestimating the taste
of the American public." As a former Procter & Gamble employee, working for
them at the height of the "P&G is owned by Satan, and I know it's true
because I saw it on Phil Donahue / Oprah / Sally Jessie / (you pick)"
nuttiness, I've learned that - yes - there are FAR TOO MANY folks who have
less than a full hod of bricks upstairs.

--
Mike Kanze

"Somewhere in the heavens there is a great invisible genie who every so
often lets down his pants and ****es all over the pillars of science."

- Ernest K. Gann



"Peter Twydell" wrote in message
...
In message , Ogden Johnson III
writes
Peter Twydell wrote:

Jim writes


Jdf4cheval wrote:


Thanks, Ed. I thought of that, but if so it didn't have the national
marking
stripes along the top of the Vertical Stab.
Joe


Ours or theirs? Foreign military aircraft based in the U.S. are
required to have U.S. markings.


Why?


Because years ago all of the black helicopter/konspiracy/tin hat
brigade were citing the presence of those German-marked aircraft
and their associated flight training program as proof-positive
that NATO/The Bilderburgers/Various Other Nefarious Organizations
had taken over the United States and all of its military forces.

Since sanity is not required of U. S. Citizens, obviously the U.
S. Gummint and the German gummint felt it was easier just to put
US markings on the aircraft [with the German colors on the tail],
than to waste time fooling with nutcases. I don't even know that
it was the result of an act of Congress rather than just being an
agreement between the two governments.



I'd like to think that answer was a joke; as my Dad used to say: "Ask a
silly question, and you'll get a silly answer".

No smiley, or obvious pointers to humour, or other versions, so I have
the horrible feeling it might be true.
--
Peter

Ying tong iddle-i po!



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phast Phantom photo Dave in San diego Naval Aviation 31 January 5th 06 05:15 AM
ex USAF/RAAF QF-4G Phantom heading down under Aerophotos Military Aviation 13 May 8th 04 08:45 PM
PBJ-1 (NAVY Mitchel) and F4 Phantom, T6 Texan and bunch of AC manuals FS Nenad Miklusev Military Aviation 0 May 2nd 04 09:24 AM
RAAF Phantom link to article Bob \D\ Martin Military Aviation 0 November 30th 03 11:18 AM
Boeing/Israeli Super Phantom Charles Talleyrand Military Aviation 0 September 23rd 03 04:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.