Clouds and Class B

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...

But.......

And the beat goes on.........

"Mxsmanic" wrote

But in Class B, ATC can direct you to a heading (FAR 91.123(b)), rather
than
simply allow you to continue on your own. If ATC does this, and you see a
cloud, and you ask for a different heading, and ATC says "unable," what do
you
do?

It won't happen.

In article , Bertie the
Bunyip says...

Max Isn't Well luv2^fly99@live.^com wrote in
:

In article , Bertie the
Bunyip says...

Maxwell luv2^fly99@live.^com wrote in
:

In article , St. Raoul
Xemblinosky says...

On 02 Jun 2008 01:35:05 GMT, gregvk wrote:

St. Raoul Xemblinosky wrote in
:

On 02 Jun 2008 00:35:31 GMT, gregvk wrote:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote in news:g1vdkb$cso$8
:

gregvk wrote in
:

Maxwell luv2^fly99@live.^com wrote in
:

In article , Blakesy says...

On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 08:52:03 -0700, Maxwell wrote in
:

In article ,
Bertie the Bunyip says...

Larry Dighera wrote in
:

On Sat, 31 May 2008 16:51:22 -0700 (PDT), Tina
wrote in
55a6512a-d611-4492-8c6e-dde1ede5cbd4
@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.co
m
:

Newsgroups:



rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.v ampire.flonk.fl
o
n k.fl
onk


Were you aware you posted your follow up article to
all
these newsgroups? Did you intend to do that?


Do you realise there's a world outside your anus?

He'd have to pull his head out of it first to know that

Larry, I'm only ditzing around here. If you want an
invasion, you're going about it the right way.

Meow?



Posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail
messages without disclosing your true identity is a
federal
criminal offence:

47 U.S.C. 223: "Whoever...utilizes any device or software
that can be used to originate telecommunications or other
types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or
in
part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity
and
with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any
person...who receives the communications...shall be fined
under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or
both."

Report it he
http://www.fbi.gov/contact/fo/fo.htm
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/offices/

If you think the fbi/doj is going to take resources from
its
search for OBL & Co to search for me, bring it on, k00k!

Meow!!!1!

Heh. Unless you're using an anonymous remailer (which you
aren't), you identify yourself when you login to the news
server. Doesn't matter what name appears at the top of your
posts; the news server knows exactly who you are, and that's
what counts. ...So the most they'll do is have a couple
laughs
and forward his whining to the Nitwit File.


And thus they provide a valuable service to those brave boys
by
lightening up thier day.

And that, my friends, is what Meow is all about.



Bertie

OMFG you're going to jail because you didn't post with your
full
legal name and I'm telling on you. Neener neener
neeeeeeeeeener.

You mean Bertie T. Bunyip isn't his *real* name?

Define "real".

Give me a break. I haven't smoked dope in going on two decades
now.

I guess that's an advantage I have living in one of the prime
growing
areas - out here you can stay buzzed by osmosis.


Marrakexsh?

The Emerald Triangle


Carribean?

Not quite that exotic

Humboldt / Mendocino / Trinity

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emerald_Triangle


--

"Tis an ill wind that blows no minds"

In article , gregvk says...

Maxwell luv2^fly99@live.^com wrote in
:

In article , gregvk says...

Maxwell luv2^fly99@live.^com wrote in
:

In article , Blakesy says...

On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 08:52:03 -0700, Maxwell wrote in
:

In article , Bertie
the Bunyip says...

Larry Dighera wrote in
:

On Sat, 31 May 2008 16:51:22 -0700 (PDT), Tina
wrote in
.
com
:

Newsgroups:

rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.v ampire.flonk.f
lon k.fl
onk


Were you aware you posted your follow up article to all these
newsgroups? Did you intend to do that?


Do you realise there's a world outside your anus?

He'd have to pull his head out of it first to know that

Larry, I'm only ditzing around here. If you want an invasion,
you're going about it the right way.

Meow?



Posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages
without disclosing your true identity is a federal criminal
offence:

47 U.S.C. 223: "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can
be used to originate telecommunications or other types of
communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the
Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to
annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the
communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not
more than two years, or both."

Report it he
http://www.fbi.gov/contact/fo/fo.htm
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/offices/

If you think the fbi/doj is going to take resources from its search
for OBL & Co to search for me, bring it on, k00k!

Meow!!!1!

Heh. Unless you're using an anonymous remailer (which you aren't),
you identify yourself when you login to the news server. Doesn't
matter what name appears at the top of your posts; the news server
knows exactly who you are, and that's what counts.

There's really no need for your newsfeed to have any idea who you are.
Use a pre-paid debit card and log in via offshore proxies...

Yes, yes. But I don't feel the need for that level of anonymity at this
time.

I still remember the auk/ahm 'war' when teh jedi haored db6...

...So the most they'll do is have a
couple laughs and forward his whining to the Nitwit File.

Too many complaints and he'll be moved to a more ... special ... file

Too many and they'll tell his ISP that he's spamming. LOL

My nsp admin has been known to do that with unjustified complaints

--

"Tis an ill wind that blows no minds"

In article , Demon
Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion says...

On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 20:03:35 -0500, St.Raoul attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
On 02 Jun 2008 00:35:31 GMT, gregvk wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
gregvk wrote:
Maxwell wrote:
Blakesy says...
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 08:52:03 -0700, Maxwell wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip says...
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2008 16:51:22 -0700 (PDT), Tina wrote:
:
Newsgroups:


rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.v ampire.flonk.flo
n k.fl
onk

Were you aware you posted your follow up article to all these
newsgroups? Did you intend to do that?

Do you realise there's a world outside your anus?

He'd have to pull his head out of it first to know that

Larry, I'm only ditzing around here. If you want an invasion,
you're going about it the right way.

Meow?

Posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages
without disclosing your true identity is a federal criminal offence:

Pleace to allow me to point out the inconvenient fact that teh usernets
=/= teh intarwebs. Usenet _predates_ the Web. By a decade or more.

47 U.S.C. 223: "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can
be used to originate telecommunications or other types of
communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the
Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to
annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the
communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not
more than two years, or both."

Report it he
http://www.fbi.gov/contact/fo/fo.htm
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/offices/

If you think the fbi/doj is going to take resources from its search
for OBL & Co to search for me, bring it on, k00k!

Meow!!!1!

Heh. Unless you're using an anonymous remailer (which you aren't),
you identify yourself when you login to the news server. Doesn't
matter what name appears at the top of your posts; the news server
knows exactly who you are, and that's what counts. ...So the most
they'll do is have a couple laughs and forward his whining to the
Nitwit File.

And thus they provide a valuable service to those brave boys by
lightening up thier day.

And that, my friends, is what Meow is all about.

Hear, hear!

There, there!


Bertie

OMFG you're going to jail because you didn't post with your full legal
name and I'm telling on you. Neener neener neeeeeeeeeener.

You mean Bertie T. Bunyip isn't his *real* name?

No, it's really mine. Ahem.

Its my turn to be teh Bertie

--

"Tis an ill wind that blows no minds"

In article , Demon
Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion says...

On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:29:39 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip attempted to
confuse the issue further by squeaking:
"Maxwell" wrote:


Nope..

Y'know, I was wondering what problem you were seeing, until I realised
that the False Max is apparently not x-poasting at all, or at least not
to AUK, unlike his other self. I think that sort of impertinence --
aggressive frogging and cutting the newsgroups line -- deserves
some...attention, that of the, ahem, *feline* variety, IYKWIM(AITYD).

There does seem to be a proliferation of Maxwells these days...

--

"Tis an ill wind that blows no minds"

BDS writes:

It won't happen.

It can happen; what if it does?

On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 05:46:01 -0700, Max Isn't Well
luv2^fly99@live.^com wrote:

In article , Demon
Lord Henry Schmidt of Confusion says...

On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 20:03:35 -0500, St.Raoul attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
On 02 Jun 2008 00:35:31 GMT, gregvk wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
gregvk wrote:
Maxwell wrote:
Blakesy says...
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 08:52:03 -0700, Maxwell wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip says...
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2008 16:51:22 -0700 (PDT), Tina wrote:
:
Newsgroups:


rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.v ampire.flonk.flo
n k.fl
onk

Were you aware you posted your follow up article to all these
newsgroups? Did you intend to do that?

Do you realise there's a world outside your anus?

He'd have to pull his head out of it first to know that

Larry, I'm only ditzing around here. If you want an invasion,
you're going about it the right way.

Meow?

Posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages
without disclosing your true identity is a federal criminal offence:

Pleace to allow me to point out the inconvenient fact that teh usernets
=/= teh intarwebs. Usenet _predates_ the Web. By a decade or more.

47 U.S.C. 223: "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can
be used to originate telecommunications or other types of
communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the
Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to
annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the
communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not
more than two years, or both."

Report it he
http://www.fbi.gov/contact/fo/fo.htm
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/offices/

If you think the fbi/doj is going to take resources from its search
for OBL & Co to search for me, bring it on, k00k!

Meow!!!1!

Heh. Unless you're using an anonymous remailer (which you aren't),
you identify yourself when you login to the news server. Doesn't
matter what name appears at the top of your posts; the news server
knows exactly who you are, and that's what counts. ...So the most
they'll do is have a couple laughs and forward his whining to the
Nitwit File.

And thus they provide a valuable service to those brave boys by
lightening up thier day.

And that, my friends, is what Meow is all about.

Hear, hear!

There, there!

Where, where?


Bertie

OMFG you're going to jail because you didn't post with your full legal
name and I'm telling on you. Neener neener neeeeeeeeeener.

You mean Bertie T. Bunyip isn't his *real* name?

No, it's really mine. Ahem.

Its my turn to be teh Bertie

Fine. Then I get to be Chairman Cow.

---
Behold the .sig file of His AssHoliness, St. Raoul Xemblinosky mhm 15x12
http://www.experiencefestival.com/raoul_xemblinosky
http://memweb.newsguy.com/~shpxurnq

On Jun 3, 12:50*am, Mxsmanic wrote:

I guess you could declare an emergency in order to avoid the cloud contrary to
ATC instructions,

So, if you knew the answer, why did you ask?????????????????????

Mxsmanic wrote:
BDS writes:

It won't happen.

It can happen; what if it does?

No it can't. ATC in Class B or anywhere else is not ever going to tell a
VFR pilot that they must continue into a cloud. It isn't going to
happen. The only exception is if the controller has lost his mind and if
that is the case the pilot will be completely within their rights to
declare that they are doing to deviate anyway and the tapes will be all
the defense they need.