A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bin Laden and his love of aviation terror



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 28th 03, 04:27 PM
Steve P
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



On 12/28/2003 6:50 AM after considerable forethought, Tom Sixkiller wrote:

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Laurence Doering" wrote in message


news:bsjruk$cjsrv$1@ID-|

|
| Damage would be reduced further by the mountainous terrain and the fact
| that most buildings in that part of the world are made of mud brick,
stone,
| or concrete, which would be far more resistant to blast overpressure


than

| wood frame construction.

I have to wonder about that, given the horrendous damage caused by the
recent earthquake in Iran. These structures do not seem to me to be
particularly well built.



The Northridge (CA) earthquake (7.1 ??) Richter killed a "handful" of
people, given the high density of the population. OTOH, _EVERY_ earthquake
in the rest of the world seems to have death tolls in the tens of thousands.

Go figure!


The Northridge quake was 6.7 and killed 57. The difference is the
building codes which also directly affects the building materials. In
Iran, the majority of the buildings are sun baked bricks/blocks, similar
to adobe with no steel reinforcing. Sun baked adobe comes apart during
strong seismic activity and the weight of the collapsing material
results in loss of life. In So Cal, the majority of the unreinforced
brick buildings that survived the Long Beach EQ in 1933 have at least
been tied together at critical locations to reduce the likelihood of
collapse on the occupants. Northridge proved that the retrofitting of
unreinforced brick buildings work. We have since changed our methods and
materials of construction. If we continued to build to the standards of
ancient civilization, we too would have tens of thousands die as a
result of strong seismic activity.

Steve P (aka eq retro dr)
Engineering buildings when not flying

  #2  
Old December 29th 03, 12:45 AM
Matthew S. Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tom Sixkiller wrote:
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Laurence Doering" wrote in message


news:bsjruk$cjsrv$1@ID-|

|
| Damage would be reduced further by the mountainous terrain and the fact
| that most buildings in that part of the world are made of mud brick,
stone,
| or concrete, which would be far more resistant to blast overpressure


than

| wood frame construction.

I have to wonder about that, given the horrendous damage caused by the
recent earthquake in Iran. These structures do not seem to me to be
particularly well built.



The Northridge (CA) earthquake (7.1 ??) Richter killed a "handful" of
people, given the high density of the population. OTOH, _EVERY_ earthquake
in the rest of the world seems to have death tolls in the tens of thousands.

Go figure!



Most of the rest of the world has no building codes or uniform building
standards.


Matt

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.