A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GPS extension?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 22nd 04, 01:16 AM
William W. Plummer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GPS extension?

Satellites are great for coverage but they are expensive to maintain (
$1B per year). Would it be possible to use all those cell phone towers
as GPS extensions, providing wide area coverage and increased accuracy?
The satellite constellation would serve as the "backbone" which
provides accurate time and position information to all those cell phone
towers, but within range, the cell phone towers will provide much more
accurate location info.
  #2  
Old September 22nd 04, 02:32 AM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Using GPS to navigate airplanes in the US is only incedental to its actual
purpose.

Mike
MU-2

"William W. Plummer" wrote in message
newsv34d.653$He1.339@attbi_s01...
Satellites are great for coverage but they are expensive to maintain (
$1B per year). Would it be possible to use all those cell phone towers as
GPS extensions, providing wide area coverage and increased accuracy? The
satellite constellation would serve as the "backbone" which provides
accurate time and position information to all those cell phone towers, but
within range, the cell phone towers will provide much more accurate
location info.



  #3  
Old September 22nd 04, 03:07 AM
Cockpit Colin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"William W. Plummer" wrote in message
newsv34d.653$He1.339@attbi_s01...
Would it be possible to use all those cell phone towers
as GPS extensions, providing wide area coverage and increased accuracy?


No.


  #4  
Old September 22nd 04, 05:16 AM
Andrew Sarangan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And you would be satisfied if the GPS only worked where there is cell phone
coverage?


"William W. Plummer" wrote in newsv34d.653
$He1.339@attbi_s01:

Satellites are great for coverage but they are expensive to maintain (
$1B per year). Would it be possible to use all those cell phone towers
as GPS extensions, providing wide area coverage and increased accuracy?
The satellite constellation would serve as the "backbone" which
provides accurate time and position information to all those cell phone
towers, but within range, the cell phone towers will provide much more
accurate location info.


  #5  
Old September 22nd 04, 07:00 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I get 30 miles out of town and my cell phone is toast...

BT

"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
58...
And you would be satisfied if the GPS only worked where there is cell

phone
coverage?


"William W. Plummer" wrote in

newsv34d.653
$He1.339@attbi_s01:

Satellites are great for coverage but they are expensive to maintain (
$1B per year). Would it be possible to use all those cell phone towers
as GPS extensions, providing wide area coverage and increased accuracy?
The satellite constellation would serve as the "backbone" which
provides accurate time and position information to all those cell phone
towers, but within range, the cell phone towers will provide much more
accurate location info.




  #6  
Old September 22nd 04, 07:01 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

the west is still wild...

BT

"BTIZ" wrote in message news:ly84d.106328
I get 30 miles out of town and my cell phone is toast...

BT

"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
58...
And you would be satisfied if the GPS only worked where there is cell

phone
coverage?


"William W. Plummer" wrote in

newsv34d.653
$He1.339@attbi_s01:

Satellites are great for coverage but they are expensive to maintain

(
$1B per year). Would it be possible to use all those cell phone

towers
as GPS extensions, providing wide area coverage and increased

accuracy?
The satellite constellation would serve as the "backbone" which
provides accurate time and position information to all those cell

phone
towers, but within range, the cell phone towers will provide much more
accurate location info.






  #7  
Old September 22nd 04, 01:52 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"BTIZ" wrote in message news:ly84d.106328$yh.29283@fed1read05...
I get 30 miles out of town and my cell phone is toast...

....on the ground.

Get a few thousand feet of altitude on things and the coverage gets MUCH better.

  #8  
Old September 22nd 04, 02:22 PM
Steve Robertson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

We've already got something like that. It's called Loran.

Best,

Steve Robertson

"William W. Plummer" wrote:

Satellites are great for coverage but they are expensive to maintain (
$1B per year). Would it be possible to use all those cell phone towers
as GPS extensions, providing wide area coverage and increased accuracy?
The satellite constellation would serve as the "backbone" which
provides accurate time and position information to all those cell phone
towers, but within range, the cell phone towers will provide much more
accurate location info.


  #9  
Old September 22nd 04, 06:45 PM
C Kingsbury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message link.net...

Using GPS to navigate airplanes in the US is only incedental to its actual
purpose.

Mike
MU-2


Well, as we move towards GPS/WAAS as the "primary source" for aerial
navigation the urgency of providing redundancy certainly increases.

Right now there's talk about maintaining a skeleton network of VORs,
or keeping the old LORAN chains going, but the idea of cellphone
towers is kind of fascinating. Here you have a bunch of radio
transmitters in highly-fixed geographical locations that squawk a
bunch of info out into the ether (hmm, sounds like a GPS satellite to
me), that are all maintained by private funds. Plus, you've got at
least 4 completely-separate networks (AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, Nextel)
going at any one point in time.

No, they're not everywhere, but odds are that anywhere you have a
good-sized airport, you have population, and that means you have
towers.

If you add precise timing and positional codes to the signal these
towers send out, you could conceivably have a highly GPS-like system
that provides some kind of backup. Reception up in the flight levels
might suck but it ought to improve as you approach the ground, which
is where you really need it anyway. And hell, if you wire it all up
right, couldn't you have a sort of break-through that allows ATC to
transmit and receive "phone calls" in case of a radio failure? Two
redundancies for the price of one! And best of all, by piggybacking on
an existing infrastructure, you save a boatload of money.

OK, I'll admit that the difference between principle and practice in
this sort of thing is the difference between being a member of the
Angelina Jolie Fan Club and staying over at her place for breakfast.
But that doesn't mean speculating still isn't fun...

Best,
-cwk.
  #10  
Old September 23rd 04, 11:26 AM
Paul Sengupta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"C Kingsbury" wrote in message
om...
the idea of cellphone
towers is kind of fascinating. Here you have a bunch of radio
transmitters in highly-fixed geographical locations that squawk a
bunch of info out into the ether (hmm, sounds like a GPS satellite to
me),
If you add precise timing and positional codes to the signal these
towers send out, you could conceivably have a highly GPS-like system
that provides some kind of backup.


CDMA operates on precise timing.

However, they usually get their precise timing from GPS receivers...

Paul


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Ulm, MN (ULM) Airport Runway Extension Study Dan Hoehn General Aviation 1 May 5th 04 03:33 PM
Arrow auto gear extension oddness Roy Smith Owning 10 March 8th 04 02:27 AM
Backup for dropping the gear Andrew Gideon Piloting 42 February 29th 04 10:22 AM
leading edge flaps Arquebus257WeaMag Military Aviation 105 January 14th 04 04:11 AM
Wanted clever PA32 engineer's thoughts - Gear extention problem on Piper Lance [email protected] Owning 5 July 22nd 03 12:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.