A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

eLSA certification



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 11th 06, 10:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default eLSA certification


In reviewing the definitions from the FAA na dfrom comments posted in
this newsgroup, there seem to be some special opportunities when
building aircraft that could fit LSA derfinitions.

If my understanding is correct, it would be possible for someone to
build (for instance) a Van's RV-6a with a Lyc O-235 or Conti O-200 and a
ground adjustable prop set to its extreme climb configuration to limit
speed to 138 mph. As long as the plane's max TOW is stated to be 1320
lbs, that would fit the LSA category.

Is this assumption correct?

TIA,

CV



  #2  
Old January 11th 06, 10:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default eLSA certification - correction



Cal Vanize wrote:


In reviewing the definitions from the FAA na dfrom comments posted in
this newsgroup, there seem to be some special opportunities when
building aircraft that could fit LSA derfinitions.

If my understanding is correct, it would be possible for someone to
build (for instance) a Van's RV-6a with a Lyc O-235 or Conti O-200 and a
ground adjustable prop set to its extreme climb configuration to limit
speed to 138 mph. As long as the plane's max TOW is stated to be 1320
lbs, that would fit the LSA category.

Is this assumption correct?

TIA,

CV


That should say RV-9a, not RV-6a. The RV-9a is stated by Van's to use a
118hp O-235.


  #3  
Old January 11th 06, 11:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default eLSA certification

As long as you had a wing loading between 8 or 9 lbs per sq ft
at MGW. 8^)

Reggie

FYI
http://www.constitutionparty.com/

  #4  
Old January 12th 06, 02:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default eLSA certification

It would never be an E-LSA it might be an experimental-Homebuilt that meets
the requirements for LSA pilots.



"Cal Vanize" wrote in message
...

In reviewing the definitions from the FAA na dfrom comments posted in this
newsgroup, there seem to be some special opportunities when building
aircraft that could fit LSA derfinitions.

If my understanding is correct, it would be possible for someone to build
(for instance) a Van's RV-6a with a Lyc O-235 or Conti O-200 and a ground
adjustable prop set to its extreme climb configuration to limit speed to
138 mph. As long as the plane's max TOW is stated to be 1320 lbs, that
would fit the LSA category.

Is this assumption correct?

TIA,

CV





  #5  
Old January 12th 06, 11:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default eLSA certification

Cal Vanize wrote in
:


In reviewing the definitions from the FAA na dfrom comments posted in
this newsgroup, there seem to be some special opportunities when
building aircraft that could fit LSA derfinitions.

If my understanding is correct, it would be possible for someone to
build (for instance) a Van's RV-6a with a Lyc O-235 or Conti O-200 and
a ground adjustable prop set to its extreme climb configuration to
limit speed to 138 mph. As long as the plane's max TOW is stated to
be 1320 lbs, that would fit the LSA category.

Is this assumption correct?

TIA,

CV




It "could" fit the LSA catagory, in that a sport pilot may fly it, but
it would not be an eLSA or sLSA... it would be and Experimental Am.
Built. (is the clean stall on an RV-9 below 51mph???)

It would be stupid.... you should build a 601 or Sonex instead, or wait
for the RV-12

--
-- ET :-)

"A common mistake people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools."---- Douglas Adams
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mechanical Systems Certification Engineer-Aviation [email protected] Home Built 0 April 2nd 05 08:25 PM
Adding IFR Plane Certification To Planes Without It Blanche Cohen Owning 10 November 29th 04 06:37 PM
Aircraft certification questions. psyshrike Owning 42 November 22nd 04 06:10 PM
certification of composite aircraft sebastian Home Built 6 March 25th 04 03:48 PM
Aircraft engine certification FAR's Corky Scott Home Built 4 July 25th 03 06:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.