A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

100 LL Replacement?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 19th 07, 11:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dave[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 186
Default 100 LL Replacement?

I came across an interesting set of slides that go into considerable
technical detail about the problems of coming up with a replacement
for 100LL. The conclusion: Avgas 91/96UL (Unleaded), as apparently now
available in Sweden. Check it out: http://www.iaopa.org/info/assembly21...iles/frame.htm

David Johnson
  #2  
Old November 19th 07, 11:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,573
Default 100 LL Replacement?

I came across an interesting set of slides that go into considerable
technical detail about the problems of coming up with a replacement
for 100LL. The conclusion: Avgas 91/96UL (Unleaded), as apparently now
available in Sweden. Check it out:http://www.iaopa.org/info/assembly21...iles/frame.htm


We have used unleaded regular car gas in our plane(s) since 1998.
Since 2002 we've run over 9000 gallons, without a hiccup. The price
difference between mogas and avgas has paid for our fuel truck, the
tank, and most of my next engine overhaul. Best of all, the plane
runs *better* on it.

Of course, you need a low(er) compression engine to use mogas, which
does present a problem for many aircraft owners. High compression,
fuel injected engines generally need the higher-octane stuff -- so
perhaps this "Swedish blend" will help owners of those aircraft out?
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"
  #3  
Old November 20th 07, 01:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default 100 LL Replacement?


"Jay Honeck" wrote

Of course, you need a low(er) compression engine to use mogas, which
does present a problem for many aircraft owners. High compression,
fuel injected engines generally need the higher-octane stuff -- so
perhaps this "Swedish blend" will help owners of those aircraft out?

You must not have suffered through the whole of the slides, or didn't get
the "catch."

In order for the turbocharged high HP engines to use even the 91/96, they
need to install a "Prisim" type management system to keep the spark knock
and detonation from taking the engine apart, piece by piece.

They did say that would work even in worst case situations, and would pay
for the changes, in cheaper fuel costs.
--
Jim in NC


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
737 Replacement john smith Piloting 26 October 22nd 06 05:21 AM
Replacement JPI EGT probe Robert M. Gary Piloting 4 July 16th 05 02:28 AM
F-15J Replacement Prowlus Military Aviation 8 April 28th 04 02:16 PM
EP-3 replacement? user Naval Aviation 23 December 6th 03 09:46 PM
KX 170B Replacement Jay Somerset Owning 6 October 8th 03 10:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.