A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Buying a 1-35 pros and cons?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 23rd 13, 09:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Buying a 1-35 pros and cons?

Does anyone have any inside info on the pros / cons of buying a 1-35. I am interested in learning cross country. I am mostly looking to hear from any current or former 1-35 owners.

Thanks,
Tim W
  #3  
Old March 23rd 13, 11:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
son_of_flubber
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,550
Default Buying a 1-35 pros and cons?

On Saturday, March 23, 2013 4:13:28 PM UTC-4, Tim Weston wrote:
Does anyone have any inside info on the pros / cons of buying a 1-35. I am interested in learning cross country.


Since I'm at the same stage of glider piloting as you are, I thought that you might appreciate my perspective. It's a bit different than the more experienced pilots.

To rephrase your question, "What are the pros and cons of a low-hour pilot buying a glider that has flaps only (no spoilers)?"

Back in August 2012, I asked RAS "how does a pilot learn to fly a flaps only glider?" Not easily. There are very few tandem trainers that only have flaps.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fro...ng/DqKTBzfdZxM

What settled it for me was this. A former owner of a flaps-only glider privately communicated off-RAS that he had wasted an entire year teaching himself how to properly land a flaps only glider. He also pointed out that some of the 1-35 landings on Youtube and such are extremely long and inept. In other words, some pilots do a crappy job of flying 1-35s and live to upload videos of their efforts. The pilot who pointed this out to me is now accomplished in XC. For that and other reasons I consider him a reliable source. Not all advice is good advice on RAS.

So maybe you're a natural pilot who can quickly master flaps-only landings. Maybe you've have thousands of hours flying airplanes with flaps. I'm not a natural pilot, and so I figured that there was a good chance that I would end up wasting a year just learning how to properly land a 1-35, and that I might get completely discouraged with the sport, scare myself badly, or worse.

A lot of the attributes that attracted me to the 1-35 were also present in the SGS 1-34. I flew a 1-34, landed it no problem on the first try, but I found the cockpit to be very uncomfortable.

I settled on buying a PW-5 or a SZD 51-1 Junior. Both of these types would be an easy transition for me after soloing in an ASK-21. They are docile, have decent performance, and they stay up in weak lift. I'm better positioned to transition to a high performance glider down the road (compared to flying a 1-34 in the meantime).




  #4  
Old March 24th 13, 12:44 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dave Springford
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 320
Default Buying a 1-35 pros and cons?

I completely agree with the comment about a flap-only glider and would advise against a 1-35 as a first glider unless you have lots of flap-only power time.

The problem is that flaps are digital, they are either on or off, unlike the analogue nature of spoilers where you can vary their position as required. With flaps, once they are on you are pretty much committed to that glide path until touch down.

The other issue with the 1-35, (based on my one flight in one) is that I found it about the most unstable glider I had ever flown. With most gliders you can take your hand of the stick and it keeps going straight. The 1-35 I flew instantly departed stable flight when I let go of the stick. After landing, I described as a glider balanced on the head of a pin.

Get an LS4 or Discus, or even a Standard Cirrus, or if you are small enough, a Libelle as your first ship.

  #5  
Old March 24th 13, 12:52 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Evan Ludeman[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 484
Default Buying a 1-35 pros and cons?

On Saturday, March 23, 2013 7:44:42 PM UTC-4, Dave Springford wrote:
I completely agree with the comment about a flap-only glider and would advise against a 1-35 as a first glider unless you have lots of flap-only power time.



The problem is that flaps are digital, they are either on or off, unlike the analogue nature of spoilers where you can vary their position as required. With flaps, once they are on you are pretty much committed to that glide path until touch down.



Dave, that's complete BS, twice. But it illustrates nicely the single most peculiar aspect of buying a flap only ship: you get all sort and manner of unsolicited advice, much of it informed by little to no experience.

No offense, but this is a semi hot button issue. Flap transition guys need the best advice they can get. Not from guys with one flight.

-Evan Ludeman (ex HP-18, HP-14)



  #6  
Old March 24th 13, 01:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Evan Ludeman[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 484
Default Buying a 1-35 pros and cons?

On Saturday, March 23, 2013 7:52:55 PM UTC-4, Evan Ludeman wrote:
On Saturday, March 23, 2013 7:44:42 PM UTC-4, Dave Springford wrote:

I completely agree with the comment about a flap-only glider and would advise against a 1-35 as a first glider unless you have lots of flap-only power time.








The problem is that flaps are digital, they are either on or off, unlike the analogue nature of spoilers where you can vary their position as required. With flaps, once they are on you are pretty much committed to that glide path until touch down.








Dave, that's complete BS, twice. But it illustrates nicely the single most peculiar aspect of buying a flap only ship: you get all sort and manner of unsolicited advice, much of it informed by little to no experience.



No offense, but this is a semi hot button issue. Flap transition guys need the best advice they can get. Not from guys with one flight.



-Evan Ludeman (ex HP-18, HP-14)


I need to clarify: what's BS is "flaps are digital" and "once they are on you are committed". I do have reservations about flap only gliders as first high performance sailplanes because in general the owner *will* spend a year learning to land it well, etc., time that might be better spent flying XC. Flaps require a lot more finesse than spoilers, or flaps plus spoilers.

My $0.02.

Evan / T8
  #7  
Old March 24th 13, 01:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Craig R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 88
Default Buying a 1-35 pros and cons?

1-35. This was my first personal ship. Serial no. 12. I had several hundred hours in her and enjoyed every damn one of them. First cross country, silver badge, gold distance, first landout, etc. I've owned other ships since then, but I had as much or more fun in the 1-35 as I have had in any of them..
My prior “high performance” experience before the 1-35 was a few hours in a Blanik L13 and Lark IS-28b (learned in a 2-33). The transition to the full flapped ship was totally uneventful. My instructor and I worked up a plan and we took the time to do it right. Home field was 5000' x 150' asphalt, so if I made errors, I had LOTs of room to work it out. I did about 15 patterns (spot landings, crosswind, etc) and got the landing down pat before I ventured out. I see now that it is very difficult for most folks to spend the time to do the groundwork before they start doing the fun stuff.
My first landing was spectacular. It felt like I was standing on my feet in the glider with my nose pointed straight down. It was a bit intimidating. Keeping focused, I sorted out the timing to round out and then sweetly touched down. At altitude I would practice dumping flaps and observe how much the ship dropped. Ground effect was another fun aspect to play with the 80 degree flaps. All good times.
Being a mostly metal ship, I could leave it tied out and fly on the spur of the moment. That was very nice. The next owner kept it on the field and flew it twice as much as I did and enjoyed it even more than I did (if that was possible).
Regarding the prior comments about the difficulty of landing of a flap ship, they are totally unfounded. If you spend the time and become intimate with the landing characteristics, the 1-35 is easy to land and fun to fly.
  #8  
Old March 24th 13, 02:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bob Whelan[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 400
Default Buying a 1-35 pros and cons?

On 3/23/2013 4:39 PM, son_of_flubber wrote:
On Saturday, March 23, 2013 4:13:28 PM UTC-4, Tim Weston wrote:
Does anyone have any inside info on the pros / cons of buying a 1-35. I
am interested in learning cross country.


Since I'm at the same stage of glider piloting as you are, I thought that
you might appreciate my perspective. It's a bit different than the more
experienced pilots.

To rephrase your question, "What are the pros and cons of a low-hour pilot
buying a glider that has flaps only (no spoilers)?"

Back in August 2012, I asked RAS "how does a pilot learn to fly a flaps
only glider?" Not easily. There are very few tandem trainers that only
have flaps.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fro...ng/DqKTBzfdZxM

What settled it for me was this. A former owner of a flaps-only glider
privately communicated off-RAS that he had wasted an entire year teaching
himself how to properly land a flaps only glider. He also pointed out that
some of the 1-35 landings on Youtube and such are extremely long and inept.
In other words, some pilots do a crappy job of flying 1-35s and live to
upload videos of their efforts. The pilot who pointed this out to me is
now accomplished in XC. For that and other reasons I consider him a
reliable source. Not all advice is good advice on RAS.


Snip...

I'm in 100% agreement with Mr. Flubber's son's segment-ending sentence
immediately above. Free advice is worth every cent you pay for it, & it's up
to you to determine if there's anything of value in it to you...

Moreover, I've never flown a 1-35 (of any stripe) but I've a brother (not a
RASident) who bought a 1-35C as his first single-seat ship. Does that count?
:-) In any event, here comes free advice!

My brother flew his 1-35C 800 hours, going from badge-less to gold in it. He
next bought a PIK-20A (no spoilers), flew that several hundred more hours,
then went to the dark side and bought an LS-6. His 1-35 transition occurred
prior to the web appearing, and his research included picking my brain.

As to my (abbienormal?) brain, with ~125 total hours (all glider) I
transitioned from a 1-26 to a Concept-70 (15-meter, experimental glass, large
positive-only deflection flaps/no spoilers), flew it 50 hours, transitioned to
an HP-14 (even larger positive-only deflection flaps/no spoilers), flew it 195
hours then transitioned to a +75/-10 flapped Zuni (no spoilers, relatively
weenie flaps) and have flown it over 2,000 hours. The 1-26 to C-70 transition
occurred in 1975 at a time and place lacking internet, flap-experienced
instructors or 2-seaters with flaps of any sort. IOW, all my preparation was
"book 'larnin'" and mental.

My transition occurred at Heber City, UT (roughly 5,000' msl as I recall, on a
~4500' runway). My brother's (early 90's?) was at Frederick, MD. Both his and
my transitions were no-sweat (as visible-to-the-peanut-galleries) affairs,
suggesting either our mental preparation was adequate, we were naturally
superb pilots, or we were incredibly lucky. You get to decide. :-)

My broad brush advice concerning "transitioning and proper use" of large
deflection flaps tends to fall into the "they're no big deal to safely
transition to and use"...so long as Joe Glider Pilot (aka JGP) has in mind
(and believes!) a few fundamental truths regarding their use. If he believes,
then so will he act...

I'll tangentially note here that the only mental error I identified subsequent
to my C-70 transition, was a pre-1st-flight decision to not use more than
30-degrees of flap in order to avoid the "major pitch change" I was aware
accompanied full-deflection use. Thanks to the Very Large difference in clean
glide angle between 1-26 and C-70, on long final it quickly became apparent my
choices we 1) overshoot with 30-degrees; 2) do one or more 360's on final;
or 3) use more flap (I used 'em all). Choosing option 3) was a
no-brainer...and a no-sweater, since I was/am a believer that pitch angle
falls out in the wash, if you believe "proper speed" matters in the landing
pattern (as I do, dry chuckle). BTW (writes this engineer), the "flap
associated pitch change" is largely "engineer speak" in the sense that ANY
glider with beaucoup drag WILL also require "major pitch-down" to maintain
speed when the boards are all out, as witness any full spoiler approach in
(say) a 2-32 or 1-34. Anyhow...

Fundamental Truth #1:
ANY flaps-only glider (including the massively-flapped HP-14) will happily
float the length of 4,000+ foot runways if flown into ground effect "too
fast", regardless of flap setting (i.e. relatively small OR full deflection).
Point being: adding some safety knots for Mom and the kids isn't wise in
flaps-only gliders...whereas when rounded out from "a proper approach speed"
any of them (including my weenily-flapped Zuni), can easily be plunked down
and stopped in a shorter distance than equivalent spoilered ships. As to
"proper approach speed", in the absence of manufacturer suggestions, standard
rules of thumb have worked well for me...after I've done "my usual" 3,000'
transition tow and stall/indicated ASI-calibration series. (In both the HP-14
and Zuni, I subsequently soared several hours prior to my initial landings.)
If for any reason JGP opts to fly high final "at some arbitrarily high safety
speed," the time to begin bleeding it off is in the early part of the
roundout, not the final (say) 3 vertical feet or so (which as-noted will
require a l-o-n-g runway!)...but I've rarely encountered pattern conditions
"opting me" to do that..certainly not on a transition condition day. IOW, I
recommend NOT "flying faster for extra safety" in flaps-only transition
flights...because it ISN'T safer. (Arguably, it's the opposite because it
unavoidably complicates the roundout/flare details).

Fundamental Truth #2:
It's MUCH easier to judge your roundout/touchdown location from a steep
approach than from a shallow approach...yet another rationale to not be afraid
to use as much flap drag as you need. If there's a 1-35 or PIK-20 at your home
field whose pilot regularly flies such approaches, you should have a sense of
how steep a glide angle full flap use will generate. There's no need to use
your drag early, as it's not necessary, and doing so will unnecessarily
complicate your approach by destabilizing it, just as if Joe Glider Pilot
opted to go back and forth from full spoiler to no spoiler in an approach. If
you KNOW you can generate a steeper glide angle than any previous ship you've
flown, why would you want to approach at prior ships' (relatively, compared to
your flapped bird) shallower glide angles? Stated another way, if I flew a
glider that could hover safely to a landing, I'd land that way every
time...but maybe that's just me!

Fundamental Truth #3:
If you come in low and slow in a flapped ship, you WILL land (crash?) short.
That said, ponder Truth #2 a bit more. Remember, we're talking transitioning
here, not squeezing 99% performance from yourself and ship on some off-field
landing quite possibly preceded by a whole bunch of dumb and dumber
decisions...there's simply no reason/excuse to EVER come in short in any ship
with gobs of drag. The draggier the ship, the easier (and higher) your
approach cone can (should) be. Point being, try and place every "con" existing
in your mind about large-deflection landing-flaps into some sort of context,
so's to make the best decision about ship choice of which you're capable. This
particular canard (always trotted out by the fearful and/or
less-than-informed), is bushwah nonsense (albeit accurate within a limited,
theoretical, sense). Tangentially, if you're aiming at the very approach end
of the runway on your transition flights for any reason, well...maybe you
shouldn't be. :-)

Clearly, flaps-only gliders aren't for everyone. Clearly not every pilot of
one is extraordinarily skillful. (I've always considered myself a
"workmanlike" pilot with a healthy desire to not break my neck.) Less clearly,
large-deflection landing-flapped gliders are the shortest-landing,
most-landing-fun gliders yet devised. Yeah, there're a number of You Tube
videos showing some (ahem!) rather ragged approaches and landings in such
ships...from which a savvy observer can get reinforced what NOT to do, and
from which to maybe even glean some bits of "why not." There're also some You
Tube examples of well flown patterns, including some by Wayne Paul in an HP-14
using full flaps, from which you can determine his roundout-stop distance is
somewhere between 200 and 300 feet. My shortest-ever ground roll in my HP-14
was 3 (paced off) fuselage lengths into a 3-5 knot, light, late evening
breeze. Five hundred feet was my planning purposes distance when "on" in my
Zuni flying.

Your mileage WILL vary...

Bob W.

P.S. Have fun with your search and transition!

P.P.S. As recently stated in another post, keep asking "Why do you recommend
that?" of every purveyor of advice, until you understand the reasoning...with
which you may not agree. I've tried to include my "why's" above.
  #9  
Old March 24th 13, 03:01 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dave Springford
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 320
Default Buying a 1-35 pros and cons?


No offense, but this is a semi hot button issue. Flap transition guys need the best advice they can get. Not from guys with one flight.


Wow - I guess you don't know me!

  #10  
Old March 24th 13, 03:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bob Whelan[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 400
Default Buying a 1-35 pros and cons?

On 3/23/2013 5:44 PM, Dave Springford wrote:
I completely agree with the comment about a flap-only glider and would
advise against a 1-35 as a first glider unless you have lots of flap-only
power time.

No problem with that advice (even though I do not agree with it, reasons - or
at least examples - why I disagree noted in another post in this same thread)...


The problem is that flaps are digital, they are either on or off, unlike
the analogue nature of spoilers where you can vary their position as
required. With flaps, once they are on you are pretty much committed to
that glide path until touch down.

Um - no offense intended, Dave - but this is utter nonsense. In my -
hydraulically-actuated, more or less "single-shot" flapped HP-14, I flew every
approach (but two) always adding flaps...but that was only because the flap
actuation system didn't lend itself to modulation, and, it had so much drag
there was no NEED to ever modulate/decrease added drag...it had roughly a
somewhere between 2:1 to 4:1 glide angle with full flaps, near as I bothered
to quantify. In my - relatively weenily flapped w. consequently considerably
shallower approach cone (7:1 it's doing good) - Zuni with a "1-35C-like flap
actuation system," approaches (particularly in vertically gnarly conditions)
were regularly flown with flap modulation, sometimes from full on to full off.
It's no big deal, though doing so does require matching (not particularly
difficult...dare I say intuitive?) pitch inputs to maintain a consistent
speed. And of course, all our approaches are flown at a consistent speed, eh?

Now, roundout time I'd agree is no time to be messing with flaps...just as
it's no time to be messing with spoilers, except maybe for the relatively more
experienced in type pilot, possibly practicing something or other...



The other issue with the 1-35, (based on my one flight in one) is that I
found it about the most unstable glider I had ever flown. With most
gliders you can take your hand of the stick and it keeps going straight.
The 1-35 I flew instantly departed stable flight when I let go of the
stick. After landing, I described as a glider balanced on the head of a
pin.


I've never flown one, but 1st-generation Standard Cirri have been similarly
'head of a pin' described to me by several active-in-them pilots when we've
compared notes, as has (e.g.) the 1-36 'Sprite'. I think my
1st-high-performance-ship, 1-35C-owning brother would generally concur with
your 'head of a pin' assessment (I seem to recall he used that very expression
in a letter to me, in fact), though he personally ultimately found it to be an
asset, particularly on weak, rattily thermalled days, since the ship 'talked
to him' so much.


Get an LS4 or Discus, or even a Standard Cirrus, or if you are small
enough, a Libelle as your first ship.


Ruh roh. There's that pesky St'd Cirrus again! See above comment...
- - - - - -

To the OP, the above exchange beautifully illustrates the unavoidable
perplexities to be found in free advice!


Bob - believes some free advice is better than others - W.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pros and Cons of a 501(c)(3) Operation Randy Teel Soaring 4 March 7th 12 04:39 PM
Starduster One pros and cons [email protected] Home Built 11 November 2nd 06 08:37 PM
Starduster One pros and cons [email protected] Piloting 2 October 29th 06 07:40 PM
AUTOPILOT PROS & CONS STICKMONKE Instrument Flight Rules 53 May 23rd 06 11:16 PM
GPS Models -- Pros and Cons Aviv Hod Piloting 22 July 22nd 03 10:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.