A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ugly Airplanes, pt 4 - Fairchild C-120.jpg (1/1)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 29th 08, 01:21 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Mitchell Holman Mitchell Holman is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,194
Default Ugly Airplanes, pt 4 - Fairchild C-120.jpg (1/1)




Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Fairchild C-120.jpg
Views:	168
Size:	52.4 KB
ID:	23060  
  #2  
Old February 29th 08, 01:48 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Hans Holbein
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 162
Default Ugly Airplanes, pt 4 - Fairchild C-120.jpg (1/1)

Mitchell Holman schrieb:

A C-119 built by FIAT?
  #3  
Old February 29th 08, 02:54 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Mitchell Holman Mitchell Holman is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,194
Default Ugly Airplanes, pt 4 - Fairchild C-120.jpg (1/1)

Hans Holbein wrote in news:fq92fo$ljt$2
@newsreader2.utanet.at:

Mitchell Holman schrieb:

A C-119 built by FIAT?



I dare anyone to post a "you are wrong, it is beautiful"
response to this one........


  #4  
Old February 29th 08, 03:58 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Michael Huber[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 46
Default Ugly Airplanes, pt 4 - Fairchild C-120.jpg (1/1)

Hans Holbein wrote:

A C-119 built by FIAT?


I looked it up, it was a concept for a pod transport. The idea was that the
bare plane would just be there to lift a payload pod that would hold the
actual payload. Rationale: Military transport aircraft have to fulfill a
variety of missions. That means that a true mulit-purpose aircraft has to
have facilities to support all these missions, be it medevac, paratroopers,
normal troop transport, vehicle transport, what-have-you. On every single
mission, however, only the facilities specific for that mission would be
used, making the rest dead weight to lug around. Pods were supposed to be
tailor made for each mission profile and thus have a better payload/empty
weight ratio than a plane outfitted to fulfil all missions at once.

Doesn't explain why it's so ugly, though. And it seems the idea didn't quite
work out.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ugly Airplanes, pt 3 - CaproniCA60.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 7 March 2nd 08 02:32 AM
Ugly Airplanes, pt 4 - f-117.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 0 February 29th 08 01:21 PM
Ugly Airplanes - An2 BFI.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 4 February 27th 08 05:59 PM
Ugly Airplanes - an2-4.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 1 February 27th 08 07:51 AM
Ugly Airplanes - an2-1.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 2 February 26th 08 11:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.