If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone use the Club Class?
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:46:06 -0800 (PST), Pat Russell
wrote: My question is: Are there any countries in the world that run national championships in the IGC-defined Club Class? Yup. Lots. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone use the Club Class?
Pat Russell wrote:
My understanding is that a "class" is a set of gliders. Classes can be defined by describing the gliders that are allowed in the class or by naming the gliders that are allowed in the class. IGC, among others, defines classes. IGC use the first method for defining five classes and the second method for defining two classes, one of which is the Club Class. -Pat Read sc3 of the FAI sporting code (http://www.fai.org/gliding/sc3). Where does it "name" club class gliders? 7.7.6 Club Class The purpose of the Club Class is to preserve the value of older high performance gliders, to provide inexpensive but high quality international championships, and to enable pilots who do not have access to gliders of the highest standard of performance to take part in contests at the highest levels. a. ENTRY The only limitation on entry of a glider into a Club Class competition is that it is within the range of handicap factors agreed for the competition. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone use the Club Class?
Pete, thank you for your enlightening point. The gliders named in the
Sporting Code http://www.fai.org/gliding/sporting_code/sc3a , Appendix 3 define the Club Class for World and Continental Championships, only. Apparently, according to SC3 7.7.6a, any glider can be considered a Club Class glider, as long as it is acceptable to the local sanctioning authority. There is no mandatory relationship between the sets of gliders that are allowed in any pair of contests. They are all the Club Class. Thank you for pointing this out. The Club Class seems like more of a concept than a class. It sure is different from the others. I guess the USA Sports Class is the Club Class, after all. -Pat Read sc3 of the FAI sporting code (http://www.fai.org/gliding/sc3). Where does it "name" club class gliders? 7.7.6 Club Class The purpose of the Club Class is to preserve the value of older high performance gliders, to provide inexpensive but high quality international championships, and to enable pilots who do not have access to gliders of the highest standard of performance to take part in contests at the highest levels. a. ENTRY The only limitation on entry of a glider into a Club Class competition is that it is within the range of handicap factors agreed for the competition. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone use the Club Class?
On Jan 28, 12:36*pm, Pat Russell wrote:
Pete, thank you for your enlightening point. *The gliders named in the Sporting Code http://www.fai.org/gliding/sporting_code/sc3a, Appendix 3 define the Club Class for World and Continental Championships, only. Apparently, according to SC3 7.7.6a, any glider can be considered a Club Class glider, as long as it is acceptable to the local sanctioning authority. *There is no mandatory relationship between the sets of gliders that are allowed in any pair of contests. *They are all the Club Class. Thank you for pointing this out. The Club Class seems like more of a concept than a class. *It sure is different from the others. I guess the USA Sports Class is the Club Class, after all. -Pat Interesting point - I did not know that there were different definitions of Club Class by different sanctioning authorities. The narrower the range of handicaps you allow the smaller the field you will get and the less competition you will get as fewer competitors can qualify. The Sports Class in the US, by that accounting, is the most democratic of the "Club Class" implementations because there is no handicap limit. No one gets excluded. The challenge in the US is the relatively smaller number of Club Class ships (by the IGC definition) in clubs or privately owned, compared to the relatively large number of Sports Class (but not Club Class) entries at competitions. Splitting the classes at the regional level would in many cases make for too few ships to have a contest on one class or the other or both. It may make sense to have a Club Class Nationals, but here again it appears that the Club Class in Europe is a path for young, up-and-coming racing pilots to gain experience. The dearth of Club Class ships in US clubs makes this far less the case over here. 9B |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone use the Club Class?
On Feb 1, 2:05*am, Andy wrote:
On Jan 28, 12:36*pm, Pat Russell wrote: Pete, thank you for your enlightening point. *The gliders named in the Sporting Code http://www.fai.org/gliding/sporting_code/sc3a, Appendix 3 define the Club Class for World and Continental Championships, only. Apparently, according to SC3 7.7.6a, any glider can be considered a Club Class glider, as long as it is acceptable to the local sanctioning authority. *There is no mandatory relationship between the sets of gliders that are allowed in any pair of contests. *They are all the Club Class. Thank you for pointing this out. The Club Class seems like more of a concept than a class. *It sure is different from the others. I guess the USA Sports Class is the Club Class, after all. -Pat Interesting point - I did not know that there were different definitions of Club Class by different sanctioning authorities. The narrower the range of handicaps you allow the smaller the field you will get and the less competition you will get as fewer competitors can qualify. The Sports Class in the US, by that accounting, is the most democratic of the "Club Class" implementations because there is no handicap limit. No one gets excluded. The challenge in the US is the relatively smaller number of Club Class ships (by the IGC definition) in clubs or privately owned, compared to the relatively large number of Sports Class (but not Club Class) entries at competitions. Splitting the classes at the regional level would in many cases make for too few ships to have a contest on one class or the other or both. It may make sense to have a Club Class Nationals, but here again it appears that the Club Class in Europe is a path for young, up-and-coming racing pilots to gain experience. The dearth of Club Class ships in US clubs makes this far less the case over here. 9B I think the difference is in the ownership of planes in the US vs other countries. In the US planes are typically owned by single persons. Clubs own a Schweitzer 1-26 or 1-34, or perhaps an L33. (This is changing gradually.) US competition pilots almost always bring their own plane. In other countries planes that are competitive in the FAI classes are typically owned by syndicates of several people. Clubs own planes that are a generation or two out of date. Competition pilots bring the plane owned by their syndicate or club. As far as the number of club class planes in the US, there are hordes of them out there. All those LS-4s, ASW-24s, and ASW-20s that dominated the competition scene here 15-20 years ago are (mostly) still around and flying. Those are all club class planes. Many of those Libelles, Cirruses, and LS-1s that dominated the competition scene 15-20 years before that are still around and flying, and are club class planes, too. The only planes that are excluded from club class are the newer planes that currently dominate the FAI classes. I do understand that people like to fly those in sports class for a variety of reasons -- I told one guy at Perry a couple of years ago to switch from 15M to Sports because he'd never flown in a contest or flown with ballast. Also, it really makes a lot of sense to go fly the sports national if your FAI national is a continent away (unless you're in the running for making the international team). On the other hand we had a big turnout at Cordele last year for club class. I think it has a place as a version of sports class. If all the planes that show up for a regional sports class qualify, go ahead and actually run it as a club class and call the occasional AST. Also, allow pilots to repeat on the club class international team. It's not just a "entry/ exit" class, it's a serious competition class. Keep allowing the experiment at the regional level and see where it takes us. -- Matt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone use the Club Class?
Interesting point - I did not know that there were different
definitions of Club Class by different sanctioning authorities. The narrower the range of handicaps you allow the smaller the field you will get and the less competition you will get as fewer competitors can qualify. The Sports Class in the US, by that accounting, is the most democratic of the "Club Class" implementations because there is no handicap limit. No one gets excluded. The challenge in the US is the relatively smaller number of Club Class ships (by the IGC definition) in clubs or privately owned, compared to the relatively large number of Sports Class (but not Club Class) entries at competitions. Splitting the classes at the regional level would in many cases make for too few ships to have a contest on one class or the other or both. It may make sense to have a Club Class Nationals, but here again it appears that the Club Class in Europe is a path for young, up-and-coming racing pilots to gain experience. The dearth of Club Class ships in US clubs makes this far less the case over here. 9B Andy, I agree with all your points. I wonder if you agree with the following: 1. The USA Sports Class should carry on, unchanged. 2. The USA Club Class experiment should end. 3. There should be a new national contest in the USA, the "Club Class Team Trials," to which all IGC-listed gliders are invited (and other gliders as guests). The results of this contest would be used to select the US Team members. -Pat |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone use the Club Class?
Three major gliding countries that don't use the IGC Club Class. *It makes me wonder if anybody does. -Pat Speaking of which. I was asked if I was going to run a "club" class at the Memphis Region 10 North in 2010. I reviewed the ships already signed up (thanks to EY for bringing the question to my mind). Seems that I already have enough to run a valid club class. Are there any other "club class" ships that would like to join us in Memphis? Are there any pilots that thought about competing in other ships, that would fly with us IF I added a club class, and break out your older club class ships? I am taking a poll, and willing to add it. I was asked the same question about Region 9 last year, but I didn't have enough response from club class ships. I would love to be able to have a central region club class to go along with the one in the east coast region. Micki Minner at msn.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone use the Club Class?
On Jan 28, 11:56*am, Pat Russell wrote:
Does any country run competitions in the IGC Club Class? Germany comes the closest. The German national competition rules are essentially identical to the Annex A (IGC) rules. Tasking and scoring are very similar. The Germans still have a distance task. Their scoring formulas differ insignificantly from those in Annex A. In the Club Class, they have removed some gliders from the top (high performance) end of the list and added many gliders to the middle and lower portions. Gliders that appear on both lists have exactly the same handicaps. Here is the German handicap list: http://www.daec.de/se/downfiles/2009/DMSt-WO2009.pdf In the UK, the story is approximately the same. Tasking is identical to Annex A. Turnpoint geometry differs. Scoring is different in ways that affect day valuation. The Club Class list is derived from the IGC list, but handicaps (called "speed index") are assigned by BGA. Gliders are added throughout the list, and, unlike in Germany, no top end gliders are removed. The UK rules, including handicaps, are he http://www.gliding.co.uk/forms/competitionrules2009.pdf In the USA, tasking is similar to Annex A, but with the addition of a speed task with pilot-selected turnpoints. There are more safety- related rules, and team flying is not allowed. Scoring is entirely different, and penalties (esp. airspace) are more severe. There are two classes that meet the IGC definition of Club Class. As in the UK, handicaps are assigned by the national organization. One of the two classes excludes no gliders at all, but disallows one of the tasks. The other one is similar to the UK Club Class, with the addition of locally popular gliders. Of the two classes, only the former has a national championships. Here is the USA handicap list: http://www.ssa.org/sailplaneadmin/sa...ndicap_xls.asp Competition pilots in all three countries (at least those who read this newsgroup) seem satisfied with their local implementations of the IGC Club Class. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone use the Club Class?
I keep reading this thread and I must say there are some here who have
a real competitive class to go to (e.g. ASW-27 owners) but they refuse to give the same right to Club Class gliders owners in the U.S. It is time to stop treating Club Class owners as lesser citizens of this community just because they don’t have fancy gliders. We already restrict classes. No 18 m gliders show up for the 15 m Nationals. So what is the problem with restricting higher performance gliders from Club Class? Maybe we should combine open, 18 m and 15 m class and call it a Super Sports Class and do away with the existing classes. I can see the uprising this would cause. I am not advocating this. I am simply making a point here. If we have Club Class Nationals on the east coast we will have plenty of people participating and Sports class will not die out. I am an ex-club class glider owner moving to a different class. I have no interest of my own here. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone use the Club Class?
On Feb 3, 3:38*pm, AK wrote:
I keep reading this thread and I must say there are some here who have a real competitive class to go to (e.g. ASW-27 owners) but they refuse to give the same right to Club Class gliders owners in the U.S. It is time to stop treating Club Class owners as lesser citizens of this community just because they don’t have fancy gliders. We already restrict classes. No 18 m gliders show up for the 15 m Nationals. So what is the problem with restricting higher performance gliders from Club Class? Maybe we should combine open, 18 m and 15 m class and call it a Super Sports Class and do away with the existing classes. I can see the uprising this would cause. I am not advocating this. I am simply making a point here. If we have Club Class Nationals on the east coast we will have plenty of people participating and Sports class will not die out. I am an ex-club class glider owner moving to a different class. I have no interest of my own here. I don't think the FAI guys are as hard over about that as you think - it isn't racing unless you are racing against someone and more is better than less. I see a fair number of contest with combined FAI classes. The main reason I see people resisting combining classes is they are trying to maximize their odds of getting on the podium - but usually those victories are a bit hollow. 9B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Club class/Sports class | Sam Giltner[_1_] | Soaring | 7 | September 28th 08 12:17 AM |
Club Class vs. Sports Class | noel.wade | Soaring | 28 | September 25th 08 02:52 AM |
SPORTS CLASS/CLUB CLASS | 5 ugly | Soaring | 0 | July 2nd 06 11:14 PM |
Does USA need a Club Class? | MC | Soaring | 42 | April 7th 05 08:07 PM |
UK Open Class and Club Class Nationals - Lasham | Steve Dutton | Soaring | 0 | August 6th 03 10:07 PM |