If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I have an opinion on global warming!
Jay Honeck wrote: I have been a student of meterology since taking several courses in college, some 25 years ago Let's see, several college courses 25 years ago. Nothing, of course, has changed since then in terms of new scientific methods of studying weather, no new accumulation of knowledge by those whose full-time profession it is to study it. You shiver in an upper mid-west microcosm, so the scientists are wrong. Well, I know I'm in the minority here, but IMHO no one in this group so far has the credentials to mount a counter argument to the global warming theorists. How it affects GA is the least of my worries for my progeny. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I have an opinion on global warming!
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:21:55 -0600, RomeoMike
wrote: Jay Honeck wrote: I have been a student of meterology since taking several courses in college, some 25 years ago Let's see, several college courses 25 years ago. Nothing, of course, has changed since then in terms of new scientific methods of studying weather, no new accumulation of knowledge by those whose full-time profession it is to study it. You shiver in an upper mid-west microcosm, so the scientists are wrong. Well, I know I'm in the minority here, but IMHO no one in this group so far has the credentials to mount a counter argument to the global warming theorists. How it affects GA is the least of my worries for my progeny. it is not about credentials. it is about data and its interpretation. has anyone seen the data? al gore presents a graph of co2 but never reveals the data behind the graph. there is no opportunity to validate or refute the data. no opportunity to get to any of the facts. one aspect of the global warming nonsense is the omission of lapse rates in the discussion. in the hottest days on the nullabor it gets to 45 deg celcius but at 14,000ft it is still zero degrees. the religion of global warming is clueless because it presents the scenario that the entire world is heating up. errr have the lapse rates ceased to function??? credentials! the pope has credentials ....but there is no god. Stealth Pilot |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I have an opinion on global warming!
RomeoMike writes:
Let's see, several college courses 25 years ago. Nothing, of course, has changed since then in terms of new scientific methods of studying weather, no new accumulation of knowledge by those whose full-time profession it is to study it. It's not necessary. The impossibility of long-term forecasting is a mathematical reality, and unavoidable. It doesn't matter what advances are made. It cannot be done. I've already explained why. Well, I know I'm in the minority here, but IMHO no one in this group so far has the credentials to mount a counter argument to the global warming theorists. The global-warming theorists have no credentials, either. Nobody really knows how the Earth's climate works on a global scale and over long periods. The theorists are no more or less likely to be right than you or Jay are. In fact, they are no more or less likely to be right than a toss of the dice. How it affects GA is the least of my worries for my progeny. The biggest danger for human beings over the long term is overpopulation. That has always been true, and it always will be true, barring some natural catastrophe on a global or galactic scale. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I have an opinion on global warming!
In article . com,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: "Reliable weather forecasts"?? Where have you EVER seen one of those? I have been a student of meterology since taking several courses in college, some 25 years ago, and am here to tell you that there are NO accurate forecast models that function beyond 12 hours out. I've been flying since 1987. In that time I've been paying close attention to weather forecast. For my area (the northeast) my undocumented observations (no pun) of the weather forecasts accuracy a 1) 12 hours forecasts have improved. So much so that winds, visibility, and cloud cover forecasts are close enough for me to make go/no-go decisions MUCH more reliably now rather than 20 years ago. 2) In 1987, 3-5 day forecasts were a joke to the point where if rain was forecast in 3 days I could start planning on maybe going flying. Weather forecasting isn't perfect, but it sure has improved for me here in the northeast. btw - back in 1984 I attended a computing symposium at Goddard Space Flight Center (if that's now the official name, sorry, but it was at Goddard). One talk of interest was the computing power needed for weather forecasting. The supercomputers used for the models in 1984 required 48 hours of wallclock time to render a 24 hour forecast. That forecast was only a bit better than 50% (?) correct. They were estimating the need for several orders of magnitude more CPU power as well as more efficient models. Well, we certainly have much more CPU power available now... -- Bob Noel (goodness, please trim replies!!!) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I have an opinion on global warming!
Bob Noel writes:
btw - back in 1984 I attended a computing symposium at Goddard Space Flight Center (if that's now the official name, sorry, but it was at Goddard). One talk of interest was the computing power needed for weather forecasting. The supercomputers used for the models in 1984 required 48 hours of wallclock time to render a 24 hour forecast. That forecast was only a bit better than 50% (?) correct. They were estimating the need for several orders of magnitude more CPU power as well as more efficient models. Well, we certainly have much more CPU power available now... But we also need much more accurate and extensive data, which we do not have. The computing power and data increase more than exponentially with the length of the forecast required, because of the chaotic nature of weather. That's why weather forecasting has barely made any progress at all, even as computing power has increased by many orders of magnitude. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I have an opinion on global warming!
Jay Honeck writes:
"Reliable weather forecasts"?? Where have you EVER seen one of those? I have been a student of meterology since taking several courses in college, some 25 years ago, and am here to tell you that there are NO accurate forecast models that function beyond 12 hours out. Exactly. So how much can you trust "forecasts" for 100 years from now? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I have an opinion on global warming!
Jay Honeck wrote:
These predictions are coming from the application of the same tools and techniques that have made reliable weather forecasts an everyday proposition. I don't see a "smiley" here -- so I can only conclude that your're serious? "Reliable weather forecasts"?? Where have you EVER seen one of those? I have been a student of meterology since taking several courses in college, some 25 years ago, and am here to tell you that there are NO accurate forecast models that function beyond 12 hours out. I've seen quite a few and they are better all the time. This winter the weather folks twice predicted major winter storms more than 48 hours in advance and were nearly dead-on both times. I was impressed. Matt |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I have an opinion on global warming!
Matt Whiting writes:
I've seen quite a few and they are better all the time. I still have not seen forecasts that can predict the temperature tommorrow with consistent accuracy. I still have not seen forecasts that can accurately predict rain, even only a few hours before the target time of the forecast. This winter the weather folks twice predicted major winter storms more than 48 hours in advance and were nearly dead-on both times. I was impressed. Some things are obvious from something as simple as a satellite photo, but unfortunately other types of forecasts are far more difficult. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I have an opinion on global warming!
I've seen quite a few and they are better all the time. This winter the
weather folks twice predicted major winter storms more than 48 hours in advance and were nearly dead-on both times. I was impressed. Meteorologists (thanks to satellite technology) have become much better at predicting storm tracks. This is quite different than weather forecasting, as in the prediction of where and when a storm will develop. All of this isn't to say that methods and results haven't improved -- they have. But we're talking about an improvement from "laughable" to only "bad" -- which is NOT something I'd hang my hat on in any discussion of "global climate change." I think we have to be very careful about the facts in this discussion. The data (or "Back-casting", as we used to call it) shows that temperatures worldwide have climbed incrementally in the last hundred years. The data does NOT show why this is happening, and everyone is misconstruing "educated guesses" as "facts". -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I have an opinion on global warming!
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
lowrance 500 opinion | d&tm | Piloting | 2 | March 17th 07 06:57 AM |
Aviation Conspiracy: CBS Spotlights Aviation's Effect On Global Warming!!! | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 1 | August 3rd 06 07:24 PM |
Your opinion about helmets? | Dave Russell | Aerobatics | 8 | March 13th 04 02:32 PM |
Opinion on club share | Paul Folbrecht | Owning | 10 | January 8th 04 05:17 AM |
Opinion on this please | Frederick Wilson | Home Built | 11 | December 24th 03 06:01 PM |