If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:fIspd.85397$V41.82999@attbi_s52... Here's a mystery that I just cannot answer: To fly to Las Vegas from Chicago costs $99.00. (For example.) To fly to Cedar Rapids from Chicago costs $300. Naturally, at that price practically no one flies on that plane into Cedar Rapids. Question: WHY do the airlines that fly into Cedar Rapids insist on flying back and forth with mostly empty planes? Would it not make sense, say, 30 minutes before departure, to drop the price until the plane was full? This is basic "Econ 101" -- if empty, lower the price until demand matches supply. Their actions seem to defy logic. In the lodging industry, you're going to find rooms are discounted much more aggressively after 10 PM than they are at 3 PM, simply because no innkeeper wants to sit empty, and the odds of being able to charge full-rate at that time of day are slim. Yet no airline seems to do it this way, at least on the short hops. If it were MY airline, I'd sure as hell rather make a hundred bucks than nothing! There must be something else in play here -- anyone know? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" Lack Of Usage Of Basic "Econ 101" in GA Aviation will be its downfall, Happens to flight schools all the time. Look at the Crooks at Columbia Flight Center they lose instructors, & customers because they put profits before service. They order parts with out your permission ect. They charge way to much for their rental aircraft you never know what the rates are going to be tomarrow. They were so cheap they did not want to spend $6.00 to develop my solo photos because there was still 5 exposures on the camera. 6 months later even after offering to pay for the development they refused and then said they lost the camera. 1 Moment in history lost for ever, 1 Page blank in my scrap book, 1 customer lost for life and no word of mouth advertizing. All they get from me Stay AWAY. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"NW_PILOT" wrote in message ... Lack Of Usage Of Basic "Econ 101" in GA Aviation will be its downfall, And this relates how??? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Jay Honeck opined
Here's a mystery that I just cannot answer: To fly to Las Vegas from Chicago costs $99.00. (For example.) To fly to Cedar Rapids from Chicago costs $300. Naturally, at that price practically no one flies on that plane into Cedar Rapids. Question: WHY do the airlines that fly into Cedar Rapids insist on flying back and forth with mostly empty planes? Would it not make sense, say, 30 minutes before departure, to drop the price until the plane was full? This is basic "Econ 101" -- if empty, lower the price until demand matches supply. I don't know about Cedar Rapids, But I'm told that Colgan Air gets a hefty per seat subsidy to fly into Rockland Maine. Their actions seem to defy logic. In the lodging industry, you're going to find rooms are discounted much more aggressively after 10 PM than they are at 3 PM, simply because no innkeeper wants to sit empty, and the odds of being able to charge full-rate at that time of day are slim. Yet no airline seems to do it this way, at least on the short hops. If it were MY airline, I'd sure as hell rather make a hundred bucks than nothing! There must be something else in play here -- anyone know? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" -ash Cthulhu in 2005! Why wait for nature? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message Question: WHY do the airlines that fly into
Cedar Rapids insist on flying back and forth with mostly empty planes? There must be something else in play here -- anyone know? If half of the rooms in your hotel were pre-paid in advance wether or not they were being used, would you still care about dropping the price? While there may be few passengers, 50% of the seats or more are already paid for. The rest is gravy. Mainline code-share partners and the government's Essential Air Service contracts keep the commuters in business. D. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I'm guessing the thought process is held in two parts:
1) They have to charge a higher price to fly to Cedar Rapids because there will always be fewer people demanding that flight than a flight to Vegas. Presumably, there will be 3 times as many people flying to Vegas than to Cedar Rapids, and so the Cedar Rapids price is three times that of the Vegas Flight. 2) If they drop the price 30 minutes before flight time, I doubt they will make more money, since it takes an hour to get through security and all. Figure there is a cutoff time - maybe the noon before, as an example - when heavily discounted fares would be picked up and consumed by last minute fare customers who otherwise would have driven. However, at the same time, we all know that premium-priced last minute business trips make up the most profitable ticket sales for the airlines. I'm guessing that someone in management of the airline has evaluated (read: gut feel) that it would generate less profit to offer 5 last-minue $100 deals, than to get 1 jacked-up last minute $500 deal. Not sure what the right answer is, but the bottom line is, as I'm sure you know, pricing is not just about covering overhead, it's about maximizing profit... What I'm surprised more airlines DON'T do is offer inexpensive upgrades for already-paid passengers. The upsell is such a big profitmaker! "Jay Honeck" wrote in news:fIspd.85397$V41.82999@attbi_s52: Here's a mystery that I just cannot answer: To fly to Las Vegas from Chicago costs $99.00. (For example.) To fly to Cedar Rapids from Chicago costs $300. Naturally, at that price practically no one flies on that plane into Cedar Rapids. Question: WHY do the airlines that fly into Cedar Rapids insist on flying back and forth with mostly empty planes? Would it not make sense, say, 30 minutes before departure, to drop the price until the plane was full? This is basic "Econ 101" -- if empty, lower the price until demand matches supply. Their actions seem to defy logic. In the lodging industry, you're going to find rooms are discounted much more aggressively after 10 PM than they are at 3 PM, simply because no innkeeper wants to sit empty, and the odds of being able to charge full-rate at that time of day are slim. Yet no airline seems to do it this way, at least on the short hops. If it were MY airline, I'd sure as hell rather make a hundred bucks than nothing! There must be something else in play here -- anyone know? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Jay Honeck" writes:
Here's a mystery that I just cannot answer: To fly to Las Vegas from Chicago costs $99.00. (For example.) To fly to Cedar Rapids from Chicago costs $300. Naturally, at that price practically no one flies on that plane into Cedar Rapids. Question: WHY do the airlines that fly into Cedar Rapids insist on flying back and forth with mostly empty planes? Would it not make sense, say, 30 minutes before departure, to drop the price until the plane was full? This is basic "Econ 101" -- if empty, lower the price until demand matches supply. Unfortunately, that logic only applies with a liquid market, where there are plenty of potential customers to actually fill the supply. It also assumes that if the airline did that then customers would not just wait for the cheaper prices before buying. There is not an unbounded supply of people who want to fly to Cedar Rapids if they are just given the right price. Let's say there are 50 people per day who want to go there, and they are willing to pay $300. Let's say there are an additional 50 people who are willing to go if the price was dropped to $100. If you keep the price at $300, you take in $15000. If you drop the price to $100, you take in $10000, and have the hassle of dealing with 50 more passengers. There is no easy way of making sure you charge the first 50 people the higher price, and the second 50 people the lower price (although the airlines certainly try to do this). I suspect the airline folks watch demand very carefully, and try to choose prices which maximize profits, and not the number of passengers flown. Chris -- Chris Colohan Email: PGP: finger Web: www.colohan.com Phone: (412)268-4751 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Jay Honeck wrote:
Here's a mystery that I just cannot answer: To fly to Las Vegas from Chicago costs $99.00. (For example.) To fly to Cedar Rapids from Chicago costs $300. snip There must be something else in play here -- anyone know? The only way to understand airline ticket pricing is to think about it in terms of how much a person needing to go to destination X will pay vs. how many competing airlines go there. -- Frank....H |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Are you referring to the Freddie Laker and People Express models?
The problem is having sufficient capacity to accommodate those you still do not have seats for after you have filled the first airplane. That was People Express' downfall. They didn't have the ability to have the right equipment at the right airport to meet the demand. Jay Honeck wrote: Here's a mystery that I just cannot answer: To fly to Las Vegas from Chicago costs $99.00. (For example.) To fly to Cedar Rapids from Chicago costs $300. Naturally, at that price practically no one flies on that plane into Cedar Rapids. Question: WHY do the airlines that fly into Cedar Rapids insist on flying back and forth with mostly empty planes? Would it not make sense, say, 30 minutes before departure, to drop the price until the plane was full? This is basic "Econ 101" -- if empty, lower the price until demand matches supply. Their actions seem to defy logic. In the lodging industry, you're going to find rooms are discounted much more aggressively after 10 PM than they are at 3 PM, simply because no innkeeper wants to sit empty, and the odds of being able to charge full-rate at that time of day are slim. Yet no airline seems to do it this way, at least on the short hops. If it were MY airline, I'd sure as hell rather make a hundred bucks than nothing! There must be something else in play here -- anyone know? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Clearly airline prices - commuter or otherwise - are the product of a
black art, probably involving the sacrifice of small critters to arrive at a price. A couple of years ago I needed to fly from Chicago to Jackson Hole (ORD - JAC). I had to go one-way - I was driving back with an old friend. One way air fare was about $800. Round trip was $500! How's that for logical? JJF Jay Honeck wrote: Here's a mystery that I just cannot answer: To fly to Las Vegas from Chicago costs $99.00. (For example.) To fly to Cedar Rapids from Chicago costs $300. Naturally, at that price practically no one flies on that plane into Cedar Rapids. Question: WHY do the airlines that fly into Cedar Rapids insist on flying back and forth with mostly empty planes? Would it not make sense, say, 30 minutes before departure, to drop the price until the plane was full? This is basic "Econ 101" -- if empty, lower the price until demand matches supply. Their actions seem to defy logic. In the lodging industry, you're going to find rooms are discounted much more aggressively after 10 PM than they are at 3 PM, simply because no innkeeper wants to sit empty, and the odds of being able to charge full-rate at that time of day are slim. Yet no airline seems to do it this way, at least on the short hops. If it were MY airline, I'd sure as hell rather make a hundred bucks than nothing! There must be something else in play here -- anyone know? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:fIspd.85397$V41.82999@attbi_s52... Question: WHY do the airlines that fly into Cedar Rapids insist on flying back and forth with mostly empty planes? Would it not make sense, say, 30 minutes before departure, to drop the price until the plane was full? This is basic "Econ 101" -- if empty, lower the price until demand matches supply. Nobody goes to or from Cedar Rapids for the heck of it. Either you live there or are going for business. If you're a resident then you've made plans weeks in advance, and if you're on business you'll go regardless of price (more or less). In fact last-minute prices are usually exorbitant because people who buy last-minute tickets mroe often *need* to get there and thus are willing to pay a lot more. If you're planning a vacation six months from now and tickets to Vegas are $99 and Tampa are $500 then you'll go to Vegas. OTOH if your client in Tampa is threatening to give the account to your competitor then you'll pony up thousands without a second thought, so the airlines take the opportunity to stick it to you. What's destroying this is the presence of low-cost carriers with very simple price models where you don't see 5-1 or 10-1 price disparities between day-of and advance-purchase tickets. FWIW in Europe I see a lot more of these "last minute bargain" deals in Europe. The travel agents at the airport frequently sell all kinds of super-cheap seats on flights leaving literally that day. I think this is more popular there because (1) they have less money to spend and (2) they take a lot more vacations so they're willing to "take a chance" and wing it. -cwk. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
Sleeping on long flights - What's the secret? | C. Osbourne | Piloting | 107 | February 21st 05 01:08 AM |
Radio outage at ZLA grounds flights | A Guy Called Tyketto | Piloting | 0 | September 15th 04 05:56 AM |
US to Ensure Safety of Japan Military Flights, Dow Jones Says | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 25th 04 04:43 AM |
Ownership and passengers | Roger Long | Owning | 30 | October 11th 03 02:00 PM |