A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Owning in retirement



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old April 26th 08, 01:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Owning in retirement

On Apr 25, 3:55*pm, wrote:
Better than 99% of roads are build and maintained by government agencies,
mostly state, with a big portion of the money and standards coming from
the Federal government.


Yes, that's the problem we need to stop. Many states allow some roads
to be built, maintained, and owned by private companies.

-Robert
  #62  
Old April 26th 08, 01:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Owning in retirement

Robert M. Gary wrote:
On Apr 25, 3:55?pm, wrote:
Better than 99% of roads are build and maintained by government agencies,
mostly state, with a big portion of the money and standards coming from
the Federal government.


Yes, that's the problem we need to stop. Many states allow some roads
to be built, maintained, and owned by private companies.


Yes, the term for them is "Toll Road".

Since they are private, they don't have to adhere to current standards.

Locally, we just managed to get rid of one of those pieces of crap and
get it under state owenership.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #63  
Old April 26th 08, 02:15 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Bob Fry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 369
Default Owning in retirement

"DT" == Darrel Toepfer writes:

DT All "hack"ers are listed in the logbooks...

So you think....
--
Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to
believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?
~ Douglas Adams
  #64  
Old April 26th 08, 02:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Ron Rosenfeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 264
Default Owning in retirement

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:46:14 -0500, Ross wrote:

Oh, I am already doing that and have been for several years. I just
wanted to know what pilots WITH airplanes were doing. My adviser is a
tennis player not a pilot.


That's probably the best you can do, as every one has individual needs and
wants. I "wanted" to be able to own my airplane by myself. (I fly 125-160
hours/year). I enjoyed the knowledge that no one else was flying it; and
however I left it -- that's how it would be when I came back to it. I was
fortunate enough to be able to arrange things so I could afford it, in
retirement.

--ron
  #65  
Old April 26th 08, 04:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Darrel Toepfer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 289
Default Owning in retirement

Bob Fry wrote:

All "hack"ers are listed in the logbooks...


So you think....


Well there was that one mouse out in the right wing...

Its only the 2nd time all of its fabric skin has come off, getting ready to
put it all back on again...
  #66  
Old April 26th 08, 05:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Drew Dalgleish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 143
Default Owning in retirement

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:57:09 -0700, Bob Fry
wrote:

"RG" == Robert M Gary writes:


RG 160 knots on 10 gal/hr is hard to best though.

Any RV (except the -12) will easily best that. Buy a used one for
less than the Mooney.


Hey he's retired . What's the rush to get there? The RV 12 will get
way better miles per gallon
  #67  
Old April 26th 08, 05:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Drew Dalgleish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 143
Default Owning in retirement

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:39:00 GMT, Darrel Toepfer
wrote:

Bob Fry wrote:
"RG" == Robert M Gary writes:


If you don't mind flying something an unknown person built.

As opposed to flying a 40-year old antique that many unknown persons
have hacked at over the years....


55 years young, but whose count'n...

All "hack"ers are listed in the logbooks...

I'm but the 3rd owner...


The builder planned to fly it himself
  #68  
Old April 26th 08, 06:35 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Drew Dalgleish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 143
Default Owning in retirement

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:58:18 -0700 (PDT), "Robert M. Gary"
wrote:

On Apr 24, 8:42=A0pm, Clark wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in news:ceadf210-c923-4f43-b70f-=


:





On Apr 24, 2:18=A0pm, "Matt W. Barrow"
wrote:


False Alternative.


It also misses the proper functions of government.


It also misses the nature of government.


Oh-for-three!


Plus, I would argue that with less gov't infrastructure I would have
made more money. I don't look towards the gov't to provide my
necessities and in areas it does anyway; it usually does it less
efficiently than I could myself.


Nope you wouldn't. You would have to provide for security, roadways, mails=

,
etc. Open your eyes and realize how much you take for granted.


Yes, and all those would be more efficient than the gov't provided
services we have today. For what I pay in state taxes I could hire a
full time armed guard and a fireman to stand watch on my house 24x7.

-Robert

Realy Let's see $10 an hour might get semi-competent workers. hardly
union wages but we'll work with it. 24x7 = 8 workers x 2040 hours a
year x $ 10 / hour = $163,200 that's only if nobody gets sick or takes
holidays. Are you going to give any training or benifits to these
workers?
  #69  
Old April 26th 08, 06:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Owning in retirement

On Apr 25, 5:55*pm, wrote:
Robert M. Gary wrote:

On Apr 25, 3:55?pm, wrote:
Better than 99% of roads are build and maintained by government agencies,
mostly state, with a big portion of the money and standards coming from
the Federal government.

Yes, that's the problem we need to stop. Many states allow some roads
to be built, maintained, and owned by private companies.


Yes, the term for them is "Toll Road".

Since they are private, they don't have to adhere to current standards.

Locally, we just managed to get rid of one of those pieces of crap and
get it under state owenership.


I guess you don't like anything unless you are paying more for it with
the gov't running it. Maybe they'll start making McD's for you. You
can get a $20 Big Mac and feel better about it because it certified by
the US gov't. Think about the line at DMV, that will be the line for
your Big Mac.

-Robert

  #70  
Old April 26th 08, 06:53 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Owning in retirement

On Apr 25, 7:26*pm, Clark wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in news:e97a0d08-9af5-4d53-9478-
:





On Apr 24, 8:42*pm, Clark wrote:
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in news:ceadf210-c923-4f43-

b70f-

:


On Apr 24, 2:18*pm, "Matt W. Barrow"
wrote:


False Alternative.


It also misses the proper functions of government.


It also misses the nature of government.


Oh-for-three!


Plus, I would argue that with less gov't infrastructure I would have
made more money. I don't look towards the gov't to provide my
necessities and in areas it does anyway; it usually does it less
efficiently than I could myself.


Nope you wouldn't. You would have to provide for security, roadways,

mails
,
etc. Open your eyes and realize how much you take for granted.


Yes, and all those would be more efficient than the gov't provided
services we have today. For what I pay in state taxes I could hire a
full time armed guard and a fireman to stand watch on my house 24x7.


So you insist on shallow thinking. Try again. Think of building codes, bank
insurance, weather observation, search and rescue. The list goes on and on
and you do own taxes for those services. Your business would not exist
without them. In other words, WAKE UP.


You are so naive. The gov't run schools have indoctrinated you so well
into thinking only the US gov't can provide these services. They
probably make you think the UL and the Insurance Highway Safety is a
gov't organization as well. There are certainly some areas where the
gov't is the best organization to take care of things. It makes up
about 10% of our civilian gov't today. 90% of it is waste that could
be done better by private industry.

-Robert
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CV-17 Bunker Hill retirement? DDAY Naval Aviation 29 May 27th 06 05:19 PM
GAF retirement of 20th FS F-4F at Holloman? Aerophotos Military Aviation 3 March 27th 04 01:18 PM
USAF C-47 Retirement Date? [email protected] Military Aviation 2 March 17th 04 01:08 AM
VC-8 Disestablishment and A-4 Retirement Ceremony John R Weiss Naval Aviation 7 August 8th 03 03:30 PM
Man cannot live on Retirement Pay ALONE Chief Military Aviation 0 July 1st 03 01:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.