The Swedish Model: How to build a jet fighter.

On May 13, 4:58*pm, "JR Weiss"
wrote:
"Douglas Eagleson" wrote...
Well, you avoided the issue, high g stalls.

Nope.

In a "symmetrical" airplane as I described, its performance and recovery
characteristics in high g stalls will be identical under + or - g. *I cannot
describe that performance because it will differ for EACH specific design,
whether canard or horizontal stabilizer!

Maybe I am wrong about actual stalls, but do not just allude to me being wrong
about stalls in canards.

You ARE WRONG "about stalls in canards"!!! *You CANNOT generalize, based on
specific design details! *A Wright Flyer is not a Viggen is not a Gripen is not
a MiG-35 MFI!

If you can go to the edge of the envelope and stall safely you can beat
nonstallable aircraft. It is an exact stall issue, not flight, but stall..

NO!!! *That is still utter nonsense!

I did generalize about canards. It is allowed because they have a
characteristic of their centers of gravity.

The NO!! does not make sense to me. WHy does a person fly at the edge
of the envelope? If you are in a bad place in the envelope you can not
do anything but loose the aircraft.

I point out that inverted stall is a SAFE place in a canard and NOT
safe in rear stabilizer aircraft. SO you claim my point is nonsense.
Why not just say what you only allude to, "inverted stalls in rear
stabilizer fighters are safe."