A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Night Currency



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 15th 03, 03:50 AM
Jonathan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That is a point I had overlooked early on. I was only logging my night
landings, since most of those flights commenced earlier during daylight.

A question I still wonder is, If I only have night landings logged, would
I still be current to land at night, but just not to take off? or do I need
both night Takeoffs and night landings logged even if I only want to land
at night (with pax). Again, most of my flights which end in a night
landing, are just day-long trips where I get home late. It is a real pain to
make special trip to airport after dark just to practice night takeoffs.

What are your collective thoughts on this subject?


"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

Actually, for night currency, they must be *Stop & Go*s, not just T&Gs
by FAR 61.57(b)


And an often overlooked point, takeoffs are included. You can have a

logbook
full of daytime takeoffs and night landings, and they don't help a bit

without
night takeoffs.

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)



  #2  
Old October 15th 03, 04:34 AM
Hilton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jonathan wrote:
That is a point I had overlooked early on. I was only logging my night
landings, since most of those flights commenced earlier during daylight.

A question I still wonder is, If I only have night landings logged,

would
I still be current to land at night, but just not to take off? or do I

need
both night Takeoffs and night landings logged even if I only want to land
at night (with pax). Again, most of my flights which end in a night
landing, are just day-long trips where I get home late. It is a real pain

to
make special trip to airport after dark just to practice night takeoffs.

What are your collective thoughts on this subject?


You need both night takeoffs and night landings to qualify - the FARs spell
this out very clearly. 61.57 says (in part):

"(b) Night takeoff and landing experience. (1) Except as provided in
paragraph (e) of this section, no person may act as pilot in command of an
aircraft carrying passengers during the period beginning 1 hour after sunset
and ending 1 hour before sunrise, unless within the preceding 90 days that
person has made at least three takeoffs and three landings to a full stop
during the period beginning 1 hour after sunset and ending 1 hour before
sunrise"

Hilton


  #3  
Old October 15th 03, 11:33 AM
Gary L. Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jonathan" wrote in message
news:TB2jb.563532$cF.240565@rwcrnsc53...
That is a point I had overlooked early on. I was only logging my night
landings, since most of those flights commenced earlier during daylight.

A question I still wonder is, If I only have night landings logged,

would
I still be current to land at night, but just not to take off? or do I

need
both night Takeoffs and night landings logged even if I only want to land
at night (with pax). Again, most of my flights which end in a night
landing, are just day-long trips where I get home late. It is a real pain

to
make special trip to airport after dark just to practice night takeoffs.

What are your collective thoughts on this subject?


Look at FAR 61.57b. Even if you take off before nightfall and stay aloft
until after dawn, you still can't have a passenger on board unless you meet
the night-currency condition, which requires takeoffs as well as landings.

--Gary



"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

Actually, for night currency, they must be *Stop & Go*s, not just T&Gs
by FAR 61.57(b)


And an often overlooked point, takeoffs are included. You can have a

logbook
full of daytime takeoffs and night landings, and they don't help a bit

without
night takeoffs.

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)





  #4  
Old October 14th 03, 05:19 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Stephen N Mills" wrote:
Actually, for night currency, they must be *Stop & Go*s, not just T&Gs
by FAR 61.57(b)


Actually, to pick a tiny nit, the landings must be "to a full stop," for
which I have never found a definition in the FAR's. I do know that "full
stop" and "stop and go" mean different things to ATC.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM


  #5  
Old October 14th 03, 11:59 PM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dan Luke" c172rgATbellsouthDOTnet wrote in message ...
"Stephen N Mills" wrote:
Actually, for night currency, they must be *Stop & Go*s, not just T&Gs
by FAR 61.57(b)


Actually, to pick a tiny nit, the landings must be "to a full stop," for
which I have never found a definition in the FAR's. I do know that "full
stop" and "stop and go" mean different things to ATC.


Just to make it fun, "full stop" means something different to approach
then to tower. "full stop" to tower means you're going to pull off the
runway. "full stop" to approach means you don't have the intension to
go missed. During training we often tell approach "full stop" and then
tower "touch n go".
  #6  
Old October 15th 03, 06:02 AM
Ben Jackson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Robert M. Gary wrote:
go missed. During training we often tell approach "full stop" and then
tower "touch n go".


Or tell approach you're going missed and do a touch n go.

--
Ben Jackson

http://www.ben.com/
  #7  
Old October 15th 03, 04:23 AM
Hilton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Doug Campbell wrote:
Practicing for my IFR, with a safety pilot (required crewmember)
I am not current at night. Can we fly this way, and achieve
currency? Not a passenger, since he is required crew.

Not an issue for my partner, we both need to get current
and trust each other's ability. Is it legal?


Acting and logging PIC are two completely different things. Having said
that... If you are not night current, your friend can ACT as PIC, you log
the landings, he logs nothing (assuming no hood work involved). The
complexity you add with the hoodwork is not required. The person acting as
PIC needs to have a current medical, have any required endorsements, be
current in whatever is required (in this case 'night'). The person logging
the time only needs to be rated in the aircraft, he/she does not need a
current medical, endorsements, or be current at 'night' (in this case).

I have purposely ignored FBO, insurance, etc requirements - make sure you
are still insured with the (ACTING) PIC in the right seat, unless you want
to risk it financially.

Hilton


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simpy One of Many Stories of a Time Not So Long Ago Badwater Bill Home Built 40 March 16th 04 06:35 PM
Infrequent flying & IFR currency Marty Ross Instrument Flight Rules 12 August 22nd 03 10:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.