Pentagon planning Navy buildup as 'warning to Iran'

wrote in message
oups.com...
[Rense_December 20, 2006]

"Ahmadinejad Is Right"

By Karin Friedemann

Ahmadinejad is doing the right thing to point out the Jewish issues.

Uh, last time I checked Syria has occupied Lebanon, not Israel.
And Iran is in Syria and Lebanon as well....

The Jews want to bomb Iran.

Cite? Just one Jewish statement of them wanting to "wipe Iran from the map".

Threatened with an Iraq-style war by the U.S. Jews, Ahmadinejad has
nothing to lose.

I doubt a conflict with the US and Iran would look anything like Iraq.

He saw from Saddam's example that if you comply with
weapons inspectors and act submissive and politically correct, your
country will be irradiated.

LMAO!, Saddam did not comply with the UN.

Mark



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

were we not talking about battleships a few months back
like pulling out the Wisconsin again and home porting it in the Gulf with a
local crew
funded by locals - hummm - why would any carriers in the Gulf be needed
and of course there is the point about throwing grenades without their pins
pulled
but the BB's just sit there and look at you and look at you and look at you
and look at you ....



"eatfastnoodle" wrote in message
ups.com...
Warning is not a Warning when nobody believes that you will indeed
carry out the threat, there have been so many "warnings" (don't do
this, don't do that, otherwise there will be consequences, don't test
the bomb/US will never tolerate a nuclear NK/Iran) sent to Iran and
North Korea so far that US credibility has become a joke, because they
did exactly what the US warned them not to do, and what they got?
ANOTHER WARNING. When you don't have the military resources, diplomatic
support and political capital to back it up, warning is just an
invitation for the world to see how powerless and stupid you are,
better to admit your weakness and try other routes.

Slow and huge U.S. warships are very vulnerable in a tiny operating
area like the Persian Gulf.

hat is why we need to take out the carrier battle groups and bring back a
battle ship that would be left there forever





"Arash" wrote in message
oups.com...
Slow and huge U.S. warships are very vulnerable in a tiny operating
area like the Persian Gulf.

Tankfixer wrote:
In article . net,
mumbled
"AirRaid" wrote in message
ups.com...
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N18217613.htm


US to warn Iran with naval buildup in Gulf- CBS
19 Dec 2006 03:28:31 GMT
Source: Reuters


WASHINGTON, Dec 18 (Reuters) - The Pentagon is planning a major buildup
of U.S. naval forces in and around the Gulf as a warning to Iran, CBS
News reported on Monday. [snip]

Naval buildup, hell. ONE Trident submarine can turn all of Iran into the
world's largest ashtray ---


Iran IS the worlds largest asstray

lol!!! If that doesn't say it all, nothing does!

Gary the mighty Yaako warrior.

Ski wrote:
hat is why we need to take out the carrier battle groups and bring back a
battle ship that would be left there forever





"Arash" wrote in message
oups.com...
Slow and huge U.S. warships are very vulnerable in a tiny operating
area like the Persian Gulf.





you mean it would be sunk?

Vince

sink them in shallow water and still use the guns and superstructure
think of it this way - we would want the Iranians to shoot at the battle ship and possibly sink it for a proper start of a war
we would not like to loose a carrier group for the same start pass - think strategic man
besides the battle ship would be paid for by the locals and could benefit them with the joint command center they do not have


"Vince" wrote in message . ..
Ski wrote:
hat is why we need to take out the carrier battle groups and bring back a
battle ship that would be left there forever





"Arash" wrote in message
oups.com...
Slow and huge U.S. warships are very vulnerable in a tiny operating
area like the Persian Gulf.





you mean it would be sunk?

Vince

Ski wrote:
sink them in shallow water and still use the guns and superstructure

this is just silly

If that is your point, no problem

Vince