Israeli Propaganda Fills American TV Screens

I don't watch TV too much any more as a result of it being so biased
and, quite frankly, depressing--not to mention wasting time on what I
perceive as mostly propaganda. It is has become little more than
slavishly pro-Israel sound bytes, created by a propaganda-machine that
is highly influenced--and almost exclusively owned--by Jews.

I was at a restaurant the other day where I was subjected to some
televised commentary and footage of the Israeli-sponsored terrorism,
etc. I couldn't very well turn it off. So I stayed and listened to
it, with the news commentators feigning objectivity for appearance's
sake.

When a brief (very brief) mention was made of the damage caused by
Israeli bombing, the news only focused on the buildings that the
Israelis damaged.

Conversely, when mention was made of the attack on Israel (the main
focus of the news cast, which was given about 75 percent of the time
allotted), the attention was focused on people hurt--thus giving
viewers the impression that Israel was only shelling mostly unoccupied
buildings, whereas the retaliation was concerning itself with people.

http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=9602

Well, if you ever have a victim of home invasion, I trust you'll apologize
to the perpetrators and you won't call the police.
IDIOT.

wrote in message
oups.com...
I don't watch TV too much any more as a result of it being so biased
and, quite frankly, depressing--not to mention wasting time on what I
perceive as mostly propaganda. It is has become little more than
slavishly pro-Israel sound bytes, created by a propaganda-machine that
is highly influenced--and almost exclusively owned--by Jews.

I was at a restaurant the other day where I was subjected to some
televised commentary and footage of the Israeli-sponsored terrorism,
etc. I couldn't very well turn it off. So I stayed and listened to
it, with the news commentators feigning objectivity for appearance's
sake.

When a brief (very brief) mention was made of the damage caused by
Israeli bombing, the news only focused on the buildings that the
Israelis damaged.

Conversely, when mention was made of the attack on Israel (the main
focus of the news cast, which was given about 75 percent of the time
allotted), the attention was focused on people hurt--thus giving
viewers the impression that Israel was only shelling mostly unoccupied
buildings, whereas the retaliation was concerning itself with people.

http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=9602

"Joe King" wrote in message
...
Well, if you ever have a victim of home invasion, I trust you'll apologize
to the perpetrators and you won't call the police.
IDIOT.

wrote in message
oups.com...
I don't watch TV too much any more as a result of it being so biased
and, quite frankly, depressing--not to mention wasting time on what I
perceive as mostly propaganda. It is has become little more than
slavishly pro-Israel sound bytes, created by a propaganda-machine that
is highly influenced--and almost exclusively owned--by Jews.

I was at a restaurant the other day where I was subjected to some
televised commentary and footage of the Israeli-sponsored terrorism,
etc. I couldn't very well turn it off. So I stayed and listened to
it, with the news commentators feigning objectivity for appearance's
sake.

When a brief (very brief) mention was made of the damage caused by
Israeli bombing, the news only focused on the buildings that the
Israelis damaged.

Conversely, when mention was made of the attack on Israel (the main
focus of the news cast, which was given about 75 percent of the time
allotted), the attention was focused on people hurt--thus giving
viewers the impression that Israel was only shelling mostly unoccupied
buildings, whereas the retaliation was concerning itself with people.

http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=9602

Which is easier for the news folks to get to? Israel or the Lebanon
terrrorist areas? I suspect they show more Israel stuff because it's easier
to get to, and probably the damaged buildings you think you are seeing in
Lebanon are actually in Israel.

Well, it's difficult to not be biased if all Muslims can do is to
behead people and generally act like a bunch of monkeys not fully
evolved since the stone age, I'm sure people's opinion will change a
lot if even an single Muslim country could achieve China or Japan level
of economic growth or win a couple of Noble Prizes, when you talk like
an animal, walk like an animal and act like an animal, you shouldn't
blame others for their justifiable opinion that you are really an
animal.

eatfastnoodle wrote:
Well, it's difficult to not be biased if all Muslims can do is to
behead people and generally act like a bunch of monkeys not fully
evolved since the stone age, I'm sure people's opinion will change a
lot if even an single Muslim country could achieve China or Japan level
of economic growth or win a couple of Noble (sic)

Prizes, when you talk like
an animal, walk like an animal and act like an animal, you shouldn't
blame others for their justifiable opinion that you are really an
animal.


your ignorance is world class

Did you realize that the Taj Mahal is a Muslim tomb?
Or the Alhambra is a Muslim palace?

Sheesh

Vince

"eatfastnoodle" wrote in message
oups.com...
Well, it's difficult to not be biased if all Muslims can do is to
behead people and generally act like a bunch of monkeys not fully
evolved since the stone age, I'm sure people's opinion will change a
lot if even an single Muslim country could achieve China or Japan level
of economic growth or win a couple of Noble Prizes,

Try Malaysia for one, economic growth ranged from 6% in the
60's to 9% in the 90's. Six or Seven Muslims have been
awarded Nobel Prizes



when you talk like
an animal, walk like an animal and act like an animal, you shouldn't
blame others for their justifiable opinion that you are really an
animal.



Wen you walk like a bigot, talk like a bigot etc

Keith

"eatfastnoodle" wrote in message
oups.com...
Well, it's difficult to not be biased if all Muslims can do is to
behead people and generally act like a bunch of monkeys not fully
evolved since the stone age, I'm sure people's opinion will change a
lot if even an single Muslim country could achieve China or Japan level
of economic growth or win a couple of Noble Prizes, when you talk like
an animal, walk like an animal and act like an animal, you shouldn't
blame others for their justifiable opinion that you are really an
animal.

Never seen the Haji Ali Mosque or the Taj Mahal?

Never wondered where the word 'Algebra' came from...

--
William Black

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.

"William Black" wrote in message
...

"eatfastnoodle" wrote in message
oups.com...
Well, it's difficult to not be biased if all Muslims can do is to
behead people and generally act like a bunch of monkeys not fully
evolved since the stone age, I'm sure people's opinion will change a
lot if even an single Muslim country could achieve China or Japan level
of economic growth or win a couple of Noble Prizes, when you talk like
an animal, walk like an animal and act like an animal, you shouldn't
blame others for their justifiable opinion that you are really an
animal.

Never seen the Haji Ali Mosque or the Taj Mahal?

Never wondered where the word 'Algebra' came from...

Or "alcohol"?
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)

"...little more than slavishly pro-Israel sound bytes...."

You haven't been watching pro-Hezbollah CNN, right?

end

wrote in message
oups.com...
I don't watch TV too much any more as a result of it being so biased
and, quite frankly, depressing--not to mention wasting time on what I
perceive as mostly propaganda. It is has become little more than
slavishly pro-Israel sound bytes, created by a propaganda-machine that
is highly influenced--and almost exclusively owned--by Jews.

I was at a restaurant the other day where I was subjected to some
televised commentary and footage of the Israeli-sponsored terrorism,
etc. I couldn't very well turn it off. So I stayed and listened to
it, with the news commentators feigning objectivity for appearance's
sake.

When a brief (very brief) mention was made of the damage caused by
Israeli bombing, the news only focused on the buildings that the
Israelis damaged.

Conversely, when mention was made of the attack on Israel (the main
focus of the news cast, which was given about 75 percent of the time
allotted), the attention was focused on people hurt--thus giving
viewers the impression that Israel was only shelling mostly unoccupied
buildings, whereas the retaliation was concerning itself with people.

http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=9602