zoom's zooming againZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Here's a quote from yesterdays ANN article:

"ANN's Jim Campbell, flying an R-44 helo (which is
proving to be an impressive load-hauler, even in the
oppressive heat) in outlying disaster areas..."

What a hoot he's got them convinced at the home office that he's flying relief
missions in a R-44 . Bet he was getting a free ride in one for an article and
wasn't even flying solo let alone flying "loads" as he's implying. Our hero :-)
I bet jauns swooning LOL!!

Sorry but this was just too funny to pass up.

See ya

Chuck (never been a hero) S

"credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:

Here's a quote from yesterdays ANN article:

"ANN's Jim Campbell, flying an R-44 helo (which is
proving to be an impressive load-hauler, even in the
oppressive heat) in outlying disaster areas..."

What a hoot he's got them convinced at the home office that he's flying relief
missions in a R-44 . Bet he was getting a free ride in one for an article and
wasn't even flying solo let alone flying "loads" as he's implying. Our hero :-)
I bet jauns swooning LOL!!

Sorry but this was just too funny to pass up.

See ya

Chuck (never been a hero) S

"credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s

Ooh, I'm impressed. Did the liar..oops..zoom publish pictures of
himself administering aid or performing rescues under fire?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...


Here's a quote from yesterdays ANN article:

"ANN's Jim Campbell, flying an R-44 helo (which is
proving to be an impressive load-hauler, even in the
oppressive heat) in outlying disaster areas..."

What a hoot he's got them convinced at the home office that he's flying
relief
missions in a R-44 . Bet he was getting a free ride in one for an article
and
wasn't even flying solo let alone flying "loads" as he's implying. Our
hero :-)
I bet jauns swooning LOL!!

Sorry but this was just too funny to pass up.

See ya

Chuck (never been a hero) S

You got that right, you never have been and never will be, you only
eliminate them, not become them. So what are you doing to help the victims
of Katrina? Sitting on your fat ass at home, wondering how you're going to
fight that lawsuit, or trying to come up with better, improved ways of
claiming that people die because they forget to install the
"optional/required" fuselage cover? That autopsy report must have hit you
like the proverbial ton of bricks!

Too hypocritical to pass up, putz.

Juan

"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
...

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...


Here's a quote from yesterdays ANN article:

"ANN's Jim Campbell, flying an R-44 helo (which is
proving to be an impressive load-hauler, even in the
oppressive heat) in outlying disaster areas..."

What a hoot he's got them convinced at the home office that he's flying
relief
missions in a R-44 . Bet he was getting a free ride in one for an article
and
wasn't even flying solo let alone flying "loads" as he's implying. Our
hero :-)
I bet jauns swooning LOL!!

Sorry but this was just too funny to pass up.

See ya

Chuck (never been a hero) S

You got that right, you never have been and never will be, you only
eliminate them, not become them. So what are you doing to help the victims
of Katrina? Sitting on your fat ass at home, wondering how you're going to
fight that lawsuit, or trying to come up with better, improved ways of
claiming that people die because they forget to install the
"optional/required" fuselage cover? That autopsy report must have hit you
like the proverbial ton of bricks!

Too hypocritical to pass up, putz.

Juan

Juan,

I commend you on your ability to avoid the salient point:

Did the Zoomer participate in relief efforts or did he intentionally mislead
ANN's readers? Enquiring minds and all that.

KB

In article , Juan Jimenez says...

You got that right, you never have been and never will be, you only
eliminate them, not become them. So what are you doing to help the victims
of Katrina? Sitting on your fat ass at home, wondering how you're going to
fight that lawsuit, or trying to come up with better, improved ways of
claiming that people die because they forget to install the
"optional/required" fuselage cover? That autopsy report must have hit you
like the proverbial ton of bricks!

Too hypocritical to pass up, putz.

Hey pucho if I thought for a minute you had any credibility I might be
concerned, but even zoom kicked you off the ANN masthead.Go play with your goat
and pretend your gonna fly your BD jaun dart..


Chuck(I actually flew what I built)S

"credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...
In article , Juan Jimenez says...

You got that right, you never have been and never will be, you only
eliminate them, not become them. So what are you doing to help the victims
of Katrina? Sitting on your fat ass at home, wondering how you're going to
fight that lawsuit, or trying to come up with better, improved ways of
claiming that people die because they forget to install the
"optional/required" fuselage cover? That autopsy report must have hit you
like the proverbial ton of bricks!

Too hypocritical to pass up, putz.

Hey pucho if I thought for a minute you had any credibility...

And who gives a **** what you think? Enjoying your new found fame? LMAO!

Juan

"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
...

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...
In article , Juan Jimenez
says...

You got that right, you never have been and never will be, you only
eliminate them, not become them. So what are you doing to help the
victims
of Katrina? Sitting on your fat ass at home, wondering how you're going
to
fight that lawsuit, or trying to come up with better, improved ways of
claiming that people die because they forget to install the
"optional/required" fuselage cover? That autopsy report must have hit you
like the proverbial ton of bricks!

Too hypocritical to pass up, putz.

Hey pucho if I thought for a minute you had any credibility...

And who gives a **** what you think? Enjoying your new found fame? LMAO!

Juan


I think Chuck was named to the Ultralight Hall of Fame because he was
already famous due to his long successsful work in the industry. That's how
it works.

Some people, on the other hand, have become infamous by being a toadies for
ANN, with a sideline of trolling on newsgroups.

It's all about credibility (and making good choices).

In article , Kyle Boatright says...

Hey pucho if I thought for a minute you had any credibility...

And who gives a **** what you think? Enjoying your new found fame? LMAO!

Juan


I think Chuck was named to the Ultralight Hall of Fame because he was
already famous due to his long successsful work in the industry. That's how
it works.

Some people, on the other hand, have become infamous by being a toadies for
ANN, with a sideline of trolling on newsgroups.

It's all about credibility (and making good choices).


Thanks Kyle .I think jauns statement

" Enjoying your new found fame? LMAO!
Juan"

says it all, only a person of the lowest moral and ethical standards would find
enjoyment in anothers tragic death. Karma has a funny way of taking care of
people like him, so I'm just waiting for jauns turn....Even zoom showed more
class in this affair.

See ya

Chuck S

"there are stupid people and people who act stupid,the stupid ones can't help
it" .... chuck s

"Kyle Boatright" wrote in message
...

I think Chuck was named to the Ultralight Hall of Fame because he was
already famous due to his long successsful work in the industry. That's
how it works.

New found fame, Kyle. Look it up in the dictionary. Very few people knew him
when he was put into the Hall (incorrectly, IMO). Orders of magnitude more
people know him now that one of his airplanes killed a billionaire war hero
who loved to help kids get good educations.

As to your opinion of me, it's shared by what, half a dozen putzes on this
newsgroup? ROFL! Just on my mailing list alone I have 400+ people who could
care less what planet you live on, let alone who you are. Get my drift?

Juan,

Since you appear to know more about the Walton crash than anyone else here,
please end the suspense and tell us what caused it. No finger pointing, no
accusations, just what caused the crash, in simple English. I'm not
interested in accusations against this person or that person, this company
or that company, just what caused John Walton's plane to go in. If it was a
design flaw, then tell us, as accurately as possible, what that design flaw
was, and what needs to be done to correct it. Not PAST design flaws, but
the one that caused Walton to crash. And note that I have addressed you as
a peer. Please accord me that same courtesy. Thank you.

Red

"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
...

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...


Here's a quote from yesterdays ANN article:

"ANN's Jim Campbell, flying an R-44 helo (which is
proving to be an impressive load-hauler, even in the
oppressive heat) in outlying disaster areas..."

What a hoot he's got them convinced at the home office that he's flying
relief
missions in a R-44 . Bet he was getting a free ride in one for an article
and
wasn't even flying solo let alone flying "loads" as he's implying. Our
hero :-)
I bet jauns swooning LOL!!

Sorry but this was just too funny to pass up.

See ya

Chuck (never been a hero) S

You got that right, you never have been and never will be, you only
eliminate them, not become them. So what are you doing to help the victims
of Katrina? Sitting on your fat ass at home, wondering how you're going to
fight that lawsuit, or trying to come up with better, improved ways of
claiming that people die because they forget to install the
"optional/required" fuselage cover? That autopsy report must have hit you
like the proverbial ton of bricks!

Too hypocritical to pass up, putz.

Juan