If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
In article z_Wyb.544890$9l5.43876@pd7tw2no,
"Ed Majden" writes: "Andrew Chaplin" Besides, wasn't the missile armament for Arrow to have been Velvet Glove? The Velvet Glove was actually a CF-100 experimental missile. The CF-105 was going to use the Sparrow II missile. It would have been no big deal to adapt the Genie to the Arrow if they had wanted to. Canada was reluctant to adopt nukes but eventually did with the Bomarc, CF-101, and the CF-104 in Europe. We were asked to leave France when we took on the nuclear role. Now, that's most patently untrue. The fact is, in the late 1950s, early 1960s, Canada had jumped onto the Nuke Bandwagon more deeply than any other NATO country, including the U.S.. The CF-104s were built solely as Nuke Bombers. They didn't have guns, AAMs, Bomb pylons, or even gunsights. The only thing they could do was haul a single bomb very fast at low altitude in almost any weather. Conventional capability was added in the late '60s/early '70s (Trudeau era) at a cost almost as great as the initial cost of the airplanes. Canadian Air Defence was provided by the CF-101s and teh Bomarcs, both of whgich were only effective when carrying Nukes. (2 IR falcons doesn not a Studly Bomber Killer make). The Army's main punch in Europe were a couple of Honest John rocket Regiments, again, only effective when carrying Nukes. The bombs may have been "Dual Key" U.S. built weapons, but Canada had been pretty much completely set up as a Nuke-Only shop for 5 years before the French threw their tantrum. (The proximate casue of which was a U.S. RF-101 overflight of their Nuke Weapons Lab. It seems that DeGaulle didn't want the rest of NATO to know what he was up to.) The U.S. always had control of the nukes. The U.S. would not hand over this control to France so we were asked to leave. The French then developed their own nuke program. 2(F)Wing in France closed with 1(F)Wing remaning open as a transport base. 3(F)Wing and 4(F)Wing in Germany took on the nuke strike recon role after converting from Sabres and CF-100s. This roll again changed down the road but I'm not sure when as I was back in Canada by then. Today Canada is non nuclear again after the Bomarc and CF-101s were phased out of service. Uhm, the French Nuke Program had been happily rolling along since the 1950s. The Force de Frappe was formed in the early '60s, and they got their Mirage IVs in 1961. -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |